Peu d’outils sont disponibles en français pour mesurer l’engagement dans des activités signifiantes, au cœur de l’ergothérapie. But. Cette étude visait à traduire l’Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey et, ensuite, à vérifier la validité convergente et la cohérence interne de la version française.
Méthodologie.
Une traduction renversée a d’abord été réalisée. Pour ensuite évaluer la validité convergente du Questionnaire sur l’engagement dans des activités signifiantes (QEAS), l’Indice de la qualité de vie et la Mesure des habitudes de vie modifiée (participation sociale) ont été complétés par 84 adultes de la population générale. La cohérence interne a été mesurée avec l’alpha de Cronbach.
Résultats.
Un meilleur engagement dans les activités signifiantes est significativement associé à une qualité de vie (r = 0,36; p = 0,001) et une satisfaction accrues envers la participation sociale (ρ = 0,40; p < 0,001). Le QEAS présente une bonne cohérence interne (∂ = 0,81).
Conséquences.
Le QEAS est un questionnaire valide qui permettra aux ergothérapeutes francophones de mieux comprendre l’engagement de leurs clients dans l’ensemble de leurs activités.
ArnsP. G.LinneyJ. A. (1993). Work, self and life satisfaction for persons with severe and persistent mental disorders. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 17, 63–79.
2.
American Occupational Therapy Association. (2008). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and practice (2e éd.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 625–683. doi:10.5014/ajot.62.6.625.
3.
Association canadienne des ergothérapeutes. (2002). Promouvoir l’occupation : Une perspective de l’ergothérapie (éd. rév.). Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
4.
BaltesP. B.BaltesM. M. (1993). Successful aging: Perspective from the behavioral science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
BejerholmU.EklundM. (2006). Engagement in occupations among men and women with schizophrenia. Occupational Therapy International, 13, 100–121. doi:10.1002/oti.210
7.
BejerholmU.EklundM. (2007). Occupational engagement in persons with schizophrenia: Relationships to self-related variables, psychopathology, and quality of life. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 21–32. doi:10.5014/ajot.61.1.21
8.
BejerholmU.HanssonL.EklundM. (2006). Profiles of occupational engagement in people with schizophrenia (POES): The development of a new instrument based on time-use diaries. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69, 58–68. doi:10.1177/030802260606900203
9.
BrownM.DijkersM. P. J. M.GordonW. A.AshmanT.CharatzH.ChengZ. (2004). Participation objective, participation subjective: A measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 19, 459–481.
10.
CardolM.de HaanR. J.de JongB. A.van den BosG. A.de GrootI. J. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. Archives of Physical Medicine in Rehabilitation, 82, 210–216. doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.18218
11.
ChristiansenC. H.TownsendE. A. (2010). An introduction to occupation. Dans C. Christiansen et E. Townsend (éds.), Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (2e éd., pp. 1–34). Thorofare, NJ: Prentice Hall/Pearson.
12.
CorbièreM.FraccaroliF. (2014). La conception, la validation, la traduction et l’adaptation transculturelle d’outils de mesure : Des examples en santé mentale et travail. CorbièreDans M.LarivièreN. (Éds.), Méthodes qualitatives, quantitatives et mixtes dans la recherche en sciences humaines, sociales et de la santé (pp. 577–624). Québec, QC: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
13.
CurtinM.JonesJ.TysonG. A.MitschV.AlstonM.McAllisterL. (2011). Outcomes of Participation Objective, Participation Subjective (POPS) measure following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 25, 266–273. doi:10.3109/02699052.2010.542793
14.
DavidsonL.StaynerD. A.NickouC.StyronT. H.RoweM.ChinmanM. J. (2001). « Simply to be let in »: Inclusion as a basis for recovery. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 24, 375–388. doi:10.1037/h0095067
15.
DesrosiersJ.NoreauL.RobichaudL.FougeyrollasP.RochetteA.ViscogliosiC. (2004). Validity of the assessment of life habits in older adults. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 36(4), 177–182.
16.
EakmanA. M. (2011). Convergent validity of the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey in a college sample. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 31, 23–32. doi:10.3928/15394492-20100122-02
17.
EakmanA. M. (2012). Measurement characteristics of the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey in an age-diverse sample. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66, e20–e29. doi:10.5014/ajot.2012.001867
18.
EakmanA. M.CarlsonM. E.ClarkF. A. (2010a). Factor structure, reliability, and convergent validity of the engagement in meaningful activities survey for older adults. OTJR: Occupation, Participation & Health, 30, 111–121. doi:10.3928/15394492-20090518-01
19.
EakmanA. M.CarlsonM. E.ClarkF. A. (2010b). The Meaningful Activity Participation Assessment: A measure of engagement in personally valued activities. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 70, 299–317. doi:10.2190/AG.70.4.b
20.
EakmanA. M.EklundM. (2012). The relative impact of personality traits, meaningful occupation and occupational value on meaning in life and life satisfaction. Journal of Occupational Science, 19,165–177. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.671762
21.
EklundM. (2004). Satisfaction with Daily Occupations: A tool for client evaluation in mental health care. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 11, 136–142. doi:10.1080/11038120410020700
22.
EklundM.GunnarssonA. B. (2008). Content validity, clinical utility, sensitivity to change and discriminant ability of the Swedish Satisfaction with Daily Occupations (SDO) instrument: A screening tool for people with mental disorders. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71, 487–495. doi:10.1177/030802260807101106
23.
EvansM. G. (1991). The problem of analyzing multiplicative composites: Interactions revisited. American Psychologist, 46, 6–15. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.46.1.6
24.
FerransC. E.PowersM. J. (1985). Quality of life index: Development and psychometric properties. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(1), 15–24.
25.
FerransC.E.PowersM. J. (2007). [Quality of life index: Development and psychometric properties]. Recherche en Soins Infirmiers, 88, 32–37.
26.
FougeyrollasP.NoreauL.DionS. A.LepageC.SévignyM.St-MichelG. (2002). La Mesure des Habitudes de Vie. Version 3.1. Lac St-Charles, QC: Réseau International sur le Processus de Production du Handicap.
27.
GandekB.SinclairS. J.JetteA. M.WareJ. E.Jr. (2007). Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the participation measure for post-acute care (PM-PAC). American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 57–71. doi:10.1097/01.phm.0000233200.43822.21
28.
GoldbergB.BrintnellE. S.GoldbergJ. (2002). The relationship between engagement in meaningful activities and quality of life in persons disabled by mental illness. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 18(2), 17–44. doi:10.1300/J004v18n02_03
29.
GrayD. B.HollingsworthH. H.StarkS. L.MorganK. A. (2006). Participation survey/mobility: Psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 87, 189–197. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.09.014
30.
HagellP.WestergrenA. (2006). The significance of importance: An evaluation of ferrans and powers’ quality of life index. Quality of Life Research, 15, 867–876. doi:10.1007/s11136-005-5467-y
31.
HammellK. W. (2004). Dimensions of meaning in the occupations of daily life. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71, 296–305. doi:10.1177/000841740407100509
32.
HeckhausenJ.WroschC.SchulzR. (2010). A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychological Review, 117(1), 32–60. doi:10.1037/a0017668
33.
HugmanR. (1999). Ageing, occupation and social engagement: Towards a lively later life. Journal of Occupational Science, 6, 61–67. doi:10.1080/14427591.1999.9686452
34.
KielhofnerG. (1983). Health through occupation: Theory and practice in occupational therapy. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis.
35.
LawM.BaptisteS.CarswellA.McCollM. A.PolatajkoH.PollockN. (2014). La Mesure canadienne du rendement occupationnel (5e éd.). Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
36.
MachinD.CampbellM.TanS.TanS. (2009). Sample size tables for clinical studies (3e éd.). West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
37.
MeyerS. (2013). De l’activité à la participation. Paris, France: de Boeck-Solal.
NilssonI.BernspångB.FisherA. G.GustafsonY.LöfgrenB. (2007). Occupational engagement and life satisfaction in the oldest-old: The Umeå 85+ study. OTJR: Occupation, Participation & Health, 27, 131–139. doi:10.1177/153944920702700403
40.
NoreauL.DesrosiersJ.RobichaudL.FougeyrollasP.RochetteA.ViscogliosiC. (2004). Measuring social participation: Reliability of the LIFE-H in older adults with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 346–352. doi:10.1080/09638280410001658649
41.
PolatajkoH. J.DavisJ.StewartD.CantinN.AmorosoB.PurdieL.ZimmermanD. (2013). Préciser le domaine primordial d’intérêt : l’occupation comme centralité. TownsendDans E. A.PolatajkoH. J., Habiliter à l’occupation : Faire avancer la perspective ergothérapique de la santé, du bien-être et de la justice par l’occupation (2e éd., pp. 15–44). Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
42.
RebeiroK. L.CookJ. V. (1999). Opportunity, not prescription: An exploratory study of the experience of occupational engagement. Revue canadienne d’ergothérapie, 66, 176–187. doi:10.1177/000841749906600405
43.
ReidD. (2008). Exploring the relationship between occupational presence, occupational engagement, and people’s well-being. Journal of Occupational Science, 15, 43–47. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686606
44.
ReidD. (2011). Mindfulness and flow in occupational engagement: Presence in doing. Revue canadienne d’ergothérapie, 78, 50–56. doi:10.2182/cjot.2011.78.1.7
45.
RosenbergL.JarusT.BartO. (2010). Development and initial validation of the Children Participation Questionnaire (CPQ). Disability and Rehabilitation, 32, 1633–1644. doi:10.3109/09638281003611086
46.
RosenfieldS. (1992). Factors contributing to the subjective quality of life of the chronic mentally. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 4, 299–315.
47.
Roy-BouthotK.FiliatraultP.CaronC.GagnonM.PrémontS.LevasseurM. (2014). Modification of the assessment of life habits (LIFE-Hm) to consider personalized satisfaction with participation in activities and roles: Results from a construct validity study with older adults. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36, 737–743. doi:10.3109/09638288.2013.814721
48.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
49.
SandströmM.Lundin-OlssonL. (2007). Development and evaluation of a new questionnaire for rating perceived participation. Clinical Rehabilitation, 21, 833–845. doi:10.1177/0269215507077278
50.
Stevens-RatchfordR. (2011). Longstanding occupation: The relation of the continuity and meaning of productive occupation to life satisfaction and successful aging. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 35, 131–150. doi:10.1080/01924788.2011.574255
51.
Stevens-RatchfordR. (2005). Occupational engagement: Motivation for older adult participation. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 21, 171–181.
52.
StreinerD. L.NormanG. R.CaimeyJ. (2014). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (5e éd.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
53.
TatzerV. C.van NesF.JonssonH. (2012). Understanding the role of occupation in ageing: Four life stories of older Viennese women. Journal of Occupational Science, 19, 138–149. doi:10.1080/14427591.2011.610774
54.
VrkljanB.Miller-PolgarJ. (2001). Meaning of occupational engagement in life-threatening illness: A qualitative pilot project. Revue canadienne d’ergothérapie, 68, 237–246. doi:10.1177/000841740106800407
55.
WilcockA. A. (2006). An occupational perspective on health (2e éd.). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK.
56.
WilkieR.JordanJ. L.MullerS.NichollsE.HealeyE. L.van der WindtD. A. (2011). Measures of social function and participation in musculoskeletal populations: Impact on participation and autonomy (IPA), keele assessment of participation (KAP), participation measure for post-acute care (PM-PAC), participation objective, participation subjective (POPS), rating of perceived participation (ROPP), and the participation scale. Arthritis Care & Research, 63(Suppl. 11), S325–S336. doi:10.1002/acr.20641 ot.62.6.625
57.
YerxaE. J. (1990). An introduction to occupational science: A foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 6, 1–17. doi:10.1300/J003v06n04_04
