Owing to its importance in preparing occupational therapists, fieldwork education has generated numerous studies. These have not been collected and reviewed, leaving researchers without a map for growing a science of fieldwork education.
Purpose.
This study aimed to systematically categorize the topics, research designs, methods, levels of impact, and themes that have and have not been addressed in fieldwork education scholarship.
Method.
Guided by a systematic mapping review design, 124 articles, identified through database searches and inclusion coding, were studied. Data were collected using a data extraction instrument and analyzed using Microsoft Access queries.
Findings.
Papers primarily addressed curriculum (n = 51) and students (n = 32). Conceptual/descriptive inquiry methods (n = 57) were predominant. Qualitative (n = 48) and quantitative methods (n = 49) were used equally. Research outcomes mainly targeted perceived participation in fieldwork. Recurring themes included student perceptions, external influences, and transition to practice.
Implications.
Three recommendations were identified: strengthen procedures for studying singular fieldwork experiences, broaden rationales for studying fieldwork, and translate educational concepts for occupational therapy.
AllisonH.TurpinM. J. (2004). Development of the student placement evaluation form: A tool for assessing student fieldwork performance. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 51, 125–132. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2004.00414.x
2.
American Occupational Therapy Association. (2009). Occupational therapy fieldwork education: Value and purpose. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 821–822. doi:10.5014/ajot.63.6.821.
3.
AndersonS.AllenP.PeckhamS.GoodwinN. (2008). Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organization and delivery of health services. Health Research Policy and Systems, 6, Article 7. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-6-7
4.
ArkseyH.O’MalleyL. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8
(1), 19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
5.
BelfieldH. T.BullockA.EynonR.WallD. (2001). Measuring effectiveness for best evidence medical education: A discussion. Medical Teacher, 23, 164–170. doi:10.1080/0142150020031084
6.
BerlinerD. C. (2002). Comment: Educational research. The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31
(8), 18–20. doi:10.3102/0013189X031008018
BonelloM. (2001). Fieldwork within the context of higher education: A literature review. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 93–99.
9.
CasaresG. S.BradleyK. P.JaffeL. E.LeeG. P. (2003). Impact of the changing health care environment on fieldwork education. Journal of Allied Health, 32, 246–251.
10.
CohnE.CristP. (1995). Back to the future: New approaches to fieldwork education. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 103–106. doi:10.5014/ajot.49.2.103
11.
CohnE.FrumD. (1988). Fieldwork supervision: more education is warranted. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 325–327. doi:10.5014/ajot.42.5.325
12.
ColquhounH. L.LettsL. J.LawM. C.MacDermidJ. C.MissiunaC. A. (2010). A scoping review of the use of theory in studies of knowledge translation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 77, 270–279. doi:10.2182/cjot.2010.77.5.3
13.
CookD. A.BordageG.SchmidtH. G. (2008). Description, justification, and clarification: A framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Medical Education, 42, 128–133. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02974.x
14.
CurrensJ. B.HargreavesJ. (2010). Situated learning in practice. In McAlisterL.PatersonM.HiggsJ.BithellC. (Eds.), Innovations in allied health fieldwork education: A critical appraisal (pp. 121–130). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
15.
CurrensJ. B.LadyshewskyR. (2010). Learning with and from peers in fieldwork education. In McAlisterL.PatersonM.HiggsJ.BithellC. (Eds.), Innovations in allied health fieldwork education: A critical appraisal (pp. 141–152). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
16.
da Mota Silveira NetoP. A.do Carmo MachadoI.McGregorJ. D.de AlmeidaE. S.de Lemos MeiraS. R. (2011). A systematic mapping study of software product lines testing. Information and Software Technology, 53, 407–423. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.12.003
17.
DelanyC.MolloyE. (Eds.). (2009). Clinical education in the health professions. Chatswood, NSW: Elsevier Australia.
18.
FarrowS.GaiptmanB.RudmanD. (2000). Exploration of a group model in fieldwork education. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 239–249. doi:10.1177/000841740006700406
19.
FortuneT.FarnworthL.McKinstryC. (2006). Viewpoint: Project-focused fieldwork. Core business or fieldwork fillers?Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 53, 233–236. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2006.00562.x
20.
FriedlandJ.PolatajkoH.GageM. (2001). Expanding the boundaries of occupational therapy practice through student fieldwork experiences: Description of a provincially-funded community development project. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68, 301–309. doi:10.1177/000841740106800506
21.
GibbsT.DurningS.Van Der VleutenC. (2011). Theories in medical education: Towards creating a union between educational practice and research traditions. Medical Teacher, 33, 183–187. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.551680
22.
GrantM.BoothA. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
23.
HammickM. (2005). A BEME review: A little illumination. Medical Teacher, 27, 1–3. doi:10.1080/01421590500046858
24.
HammickM.DornanT.SteinertY. (2010). Conducting a best evidence systematic review: Part 1. From idea to data coding. BEME Guide No. 13. Medical Teacher, 32, 3–15. doi:10.3109/01421590903414245
25.
HandC.LawM.McCollM. A. (2011). Occupational therapy interventions for chronic diseases: A scoping review. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 428–436. doi:10.5014/ajot.2011.002071
26.
HardenR. M.CrosbyJ. R.DavisM. H. (1999). AMEE Guide No. 14: Outcome-based education. Part 1. An introduction to outcome-based education. Medical Teacher, 21, 7–14. doi:10.1080/01421599979969
27.
HarvisonN.GravesS. (2011, April). Academic programs annual data report: Academic year 2010–2011. Paper presented at the American Occupational Therapy Association, Philadelphia, PA.
28.
HockingC.NessN. E. (2002). World Federation of Occupational Therapists: Revised minimum standards for the education of occupational therapists. Perth, Australia: World Federation of Occupational Therapists.
29.
HooperB.KingR.WoodW.BilicsA.GuptaJ. (2013). An international systematic mapping review of educational approaches and teaching methods in occupational therapy education. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76, 9–22.
30.
IssenbergS. B.McGaghieW. C.PetrusaE. R.GordonD. L.ScaleseR. J. (2005). Appendix 1: BEME coding sheet. Online appendix cited in “Features and Uses of High-Fidelity Medical Simulations That Lead to Effective Learning: A BEME Systematic Review. BEME Guide 4,”Medical Teacher, 27, 10–28. Retrieved fromhttp://bemecollaboration.org/Published+Reviews/BEME+Guide+No+4/
31.
JonesL. E.HammondJ. A.BeaudoinJ. (2010). Clinically-based learning portfolios. In McAlisterL.PatersonM.HiggsJ.BithellC. (Eds.), Innovations in allied health fieldwork education: A critical appraisal (pp. 131–140). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
32.
JungB.SolomonP.MartinA. (2010). Collaborative fieldwork education: Exploring the intraprofessional and interprofessional context. In McAlisterL.PatersonM.HiggsJ.BithellC. (Eds.), Innovations in allied health fieldwork education: A critical appraisal (pp. 235–246). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Publishers.
33.
KingR.HooperB.WoodW. (2011). Using bibliographic software to appraise and code data in educational systematic review research. Medical Teacher, 33, 719–723. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.558138
34.
KirkpatrickD. (1967). Evaluation of training. In CraigR.MittelI. (Eds.), Training and development handbook (pp. 131–167). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
35.
KramerP.SternK. (1995). Approaches to improving student performance on fieldwork. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 156–159. doi:10.5014/ajot.49.2.156
36.
LattucaL. R.StarkJ. S. (2009). Shaping the college curriculum: Academic plans in context (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
37.
LelandN. E.ElliottS. J.O’MalleyL.MurphyS. L. (2012). Occupational therapy in fall prevention: Current evidence and future directions. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66, 149–160. doi:10.5014/ajot.2012.002733
38.
MarshallC.RossmanG. B. (2010). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
McAllisterL.BithellC.HiggsJ. (2010). Innovations in fieldwork education: Trends and future directions. In McAlisterL.PatersonM.HiggsJ.BithellC. (Eds.), Innovations in allied health fieldwork education: A critical appraisal (pp. 17–28). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
40.
McAllisterL.PatersonM.HiggsJ.BithellC. (Eds.). (2010). Innovations in allied health fieldwork education: A critical appraisal. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
41.
McCollM. A.ShorttS.GodwinM.SmithK.RoweK.O’BrienP.DonnellyC. (2009). Models for integrating rehabilitation and primary care: A scoping study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90, 1523–1531. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.03.017
42.
OpacichK. J. (1995). Is an educational philosophy missing from the fieldwork solution?American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 160–164. doi:10.5014/ajot.49.2.160
43.
PackerT. L.PatersonM.KrupaT.AvtchoukhovaL.TchebotarevaL.KrasnovaL. (2000). Client outcomes after student community fieldwork in Russia. Occupational Therapy International, 7, 191–197. doi:10.1002/oti.120
44.
PriggA.MackenzieL. (2002). Project placements for undergraduate occupational therapy students: Design, implementation and evaluation. Occupational Therapy International, 9, 210–236. doi:10.1002/oti.166
45.
ProvidentI. M.Joyce-GaguzisK. (2005). Creating an occupational therapy Level II fieldwork experience in a county jail setting. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 101–106. doi:10.5014/ajot.59.1.101
46.
SmithM.HiggsJ. (2010). Trends in fieldwork education. In McAlisterL.PatersonM.HiggsJ.BithellC. (Eds.), Innovations in allied health fieldwork education: A critical appraisal (pp. 29–38). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
47.
TochelC.HaigA.HeskethA.CadzowA.BeggsK.ColthartI.PeacockH. (2009). The effectiveness of portfolios for post-graduate assessment and education: BEME Guide No 12. Medical Teacher, 31, 320–339. doi:10.1080/01421590902883056
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
