The context that supported occupational therapy’s inception has been replaced with new challenges brought on by globalization and dramatic changes in health care. Thus, the profession’s philosophical grounding needs to be reframed to (a) achieve balance between science-driven and holistic elements, (b) operate within larger contexts on problems brought on by sociopolitical and natural determinants of health, and (c) maintain an ethical identity across all arenas of practice.
Purpose.
This paper presents a brief discussion of the philosophical underpinnings in occupational therapy’s history, outlines new global challenges for the profession, and proposes a new framework to address these challenges through education, practice, and research.
Key Issues.
Occupational therapy finds itself practising in a growing number of middle- and low-income countries where its roles and values need to be context and culture specific.
Implications.
The Accountability–Well-Being–Ethics framework guides the three domains of education, research, and practice to be relevant in an increasingly complex world.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
5.
BernspångB. (2009) Editorial: A more global arena for occupational therapy science. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 16, 67. doi:10.1080/11038120902931251
6.
BockovenJ. S. (1956). Moral treatment in American psychiatry. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 124, 167–194. doi:10.1002/1520-6696(196507)
7.
BreinesE. (1987). Pragmatism as a foundation for occupational therapy curricula. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41, 522–525. doi:10.5014/ajot.41.8.522
8.
CameronD.CockburnL.NixonS.ParnesP.GarciaL.LeotaudJ.…WilliamsT. (2013). Global partnerships for international fieldwork in occupational therapy: Reflection and innovation. Occupational Therapy International, 20, 88–96. doi:10.1002/oti.1352
9.
ChanL.CostaS. (2005). Participation in the global knowledge commons: Challenges and opportunities for research dissemination in developing countries. New Library World, 106, 141–163. doi:10.1108/03074800510587354
10.
CorringD.CookJ. (1999). Client-centered care means that I am a valued human being. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66, 70–82. doi:10.1177/000841749906600203
11.
CutchinM. P. (2004). Using Deweyan philosophy to rename and reframe adaptation-to-environment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 303–312. doi:10.5014/ajot.58.3.303
12.
DeneulinS.McGregorJ. A. (2010). The capability approach and the politics of a social conception of well-being. European Journal of Social Theory, 13, 501–519. doi:10.1177/1368431010382762
13.
DerridaJ. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
DobleS. E.SanthaJ. C. (2008). Occupational well-being: Rethinking occupational therapy outcomes. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75, 184–190. doi:10.1177/000841740807500310
15.
FinlayL. (2001). Holism in occupational therapy: Elusive fiction and ambivalent struggle. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 268–276. doi:10.5014/ajot.55.3.268
16.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
17.
GalheigoS. M. (2011). What needs to be done? Occupational therapy responsibilities and challenges regarding human rights. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 58, 60–66. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00922.x
18.
GibsonJ. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In ShawR.BransfordJ. (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
GramsciA. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York, NY: International Publishers.
20.
HammellK. W. (2008). Reflections on…well-being and occupational rights. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75, 62–64. doi:10.2182/cjot.07.007
21.
HasselkusB. R. (2002). The meaning of everyday occupation. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
22.
HemmingssonH.JonssonH. (2005). An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the international classification of functioning, disability and health: Some critical remarks. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 569–576. doi:10.5014/ajot.59.5.569
23.
HollandK. E.MiddletonL.UysL. (2013). Professional confidence: Conceptions held by novice occupational therapists in South Africa. Occupational Therapy International, 20, 105–113. doi:10.1002/oti.1340
24.
HonderichT. (Ed.). (2005). The Oxford companion to philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
HooperB.WoodW. (2002). Pragmatism and structuralism in occupational therapy: The long conversation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 40–50. doi:10.5014/ajot.56.1.40
26.
IkiuguM. N.SchultzS. (2006). An argument for pragmatism as a foundational philosophy of occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73, 86–97. doi:10.2182/cjot.05.0009
27.
IwamaM. (2007). Culture and occupational therapy: Meeting the challenge of relevance in a global world. Occupational Therapy International, 14, 183–187. doi:10.1002/oti.234
KolendaK. (1990). Rorty’s humanistic pragmatism. Tampa: University of South Florida Press.
30.
KondoT. (2004). Cultural tensions in occupational therapy practice: Considerations from a Japanese vantage point. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 174–184. doi:10.5014/ajot.58.2.174
NjelesaniJ.CameronD.PolatajkoH. J. (2012). Occupation-for-development: Expanding the boundaries of occupational science into the international agenda. Journal of Occupational Science, 9, 36–43. doi:10.1080/14427591.2011.639665
36.
NussbaumM. (2001). Women and human development: The capabilities approach (Vol. 3). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
NussbaumM. (2006). Frontiers of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
38.
OdawaraE. (2005). Cultural competency in occupational therapy: Beyond a cross-cultural view of practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 325–334. doi:10.5014/ajot.59.3.325
39.
PeloquinS. M. (2000). The philosophy of occupational therapy. In PunwarA J.PeloquinS. M. (Eds.), Occupational therapy: Principles and practice (3rd ed., pp. 7–20). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
40.
PollardN.SakellariouD. (2007) Occupation, education and community-based rehabilitation. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70, 171–174.
41.
QuirogaV. A. (1995). Occupational therapy: The first thirty years, 1900–1930. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
42.
RawlsJ. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
43.
Rebeiro GruhlK. L. (2005). Reflections on…the recovery paradigm: Should occupational therapists be interested?Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72, 96–102. doi:10.1177/000841740507200204
44.
RogersS. (2005). Portrait of occupational therapy. Journal of Interpersonal Care, 19, 70–79. doi:10.1080/13561820400021767
45.
RortyR. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
RortyR. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
47.
RortyR. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. London, UK: Penguin Books.
48.
RoweC. (1979). Contrasting philosophies in occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 113–114. doi:10.1177/000841747904600312
49.
RowlesG. D. (2008). Place in occupational science: A life course perspective on the role of environmental context in the quest for meaning. Journal of Occupational Science, 3(15), 127–135. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686622
50.
SchwartzK. B. (2003). History of occupational therapy. In CrepeauE. B.CohnE. S.SchellB. A. B. (Eds.), Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy (10th ed., pp. 5–13). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
51.
SenA. (1999). Development as freedom. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
52.
SenA. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
53.
SteinF.CutlerS. K. (2001). Psychosocial occupational therapy: A holistic approach. New York, NY: Delmar Thomson Learning.
54.
VizardP.Fukuda-ParrS.ElsonD. (2011). Introduction: The capability approach and human rights. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12, 1–22. doi:10.1080/19452829.2010.541728
55.
WatsonR. M. (2006). Being before doing: The cultural identity (essence) of occupational therapy. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 53, 151–158. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2006.00598.x
World Health Organization. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Retrieved fromhttp://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2008/9789241563703_eng.pdf
Wright-St. ClairV. (2012). The case for multiple research methodologies. In WhitefordG. E.HockingC. (Eds.), Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 137–151). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
61.
YerxaE. J. (1967). 1966 Eleanor Clarke Slagle lecture: Authentic occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 21, 1–9.
