CoboE.CortésJ.RiberaJ. M.CardellachF.Selva-O’CallaghanA.KostovB.,…VilardellM. (2011). Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: Masked randomised trial. British Medical Journal, 343, d6783. doi:10.1136/bmj.d6783
MoherD.SimeraI.SchulzK. F.HoeyJ.AltmanD. G. (2008). Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research. BMC Medicine, 6, Article 13.doi:10.1186/1741-7015-6-13
6.
SimeraI.AltmanD. G.MoherD.SchulzK. F.HoeyJ. (2008). Guidelines for reporting health research: The EQUATOR Network’s survey of guideline authors. PLoS Medicine, 5(6), e139. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050139
7.
SmidtN.RutjesA. W.van der WindtD. A.OsteloR. W.BossuytP. M.ReitsmaJ. B.,…de VetH. C. (2006). The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: Has it improved?Neurology, 67, 792–797. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000238386.41398.30
8.
TurnerL.ShamseerL.AltmanD. G.SchulzK. F.MoherD. (2012). Does use of the CONSORT statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review. Systematic Reviews, 1, Article 60. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-1-60