Background. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model presents an opportunity to better understand previously neglected longterm social outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), especially the experience of participation. Purpose. The study explored the relationship between perceived environmental barriers and perceived community integration (a participation proxy) in a sample of adults with traumatic SCI. Methods. The study interviewed African American and White women and men (n=136) who had lived with SCI for an average of 11.5 years. Results. Participants reported environmental barriers at twice the level indicated by previous studies; the natural environment and the policies of government were the most problematic. Levels of community integration were also high. Data suggest a significant relationship (p<.01) between perceived environmental barriers and community integration for adults with SCI, providing support for the ICF model. Implications. Improved measures and more sophisticated concepts and theories are needed to explicate the relationship between environmental factors and participation concepts in the ICF. With respect to practice, occupational therapists need to be aware that removal of environmental barriers is only a first step in the more complex effort to facilitate optimal community integration after SCI.
AnzaiK.YoungJ.McCallumJ.MillerB.JongbloedL. (2006). Factors influencing discharge location following high lesion spinal cord injury rehabilitation in British Columbia, Canada. Spinal Cord, 44, 11–18.
2.
BoschenK.TonackM.GargaroJ. (2003). Long-term adjustment and community reintegration following spinal cord injury. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 26, 157–162.
3.
CohenS.MermelsteinR.KamarackT.HobermanH. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In: SarasonI. B.SarasonB. (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research and applications (pp. 73–94). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
4.
DijkersM. (1997). Quality of life after spinal cord injury: A meta analysis of the effects of disablement components. Spinal Cord, 35, 829–840.
5.
DijkersM. (1999). Community integration: Conceptual issues and measurement approaches in rehabilitation research. Journal of Rehabilitation Outcome Measurements, 3, 39–49.
6.
DijkersM. (2005). Quality of life of individuals with spinal cord injury: A review of conceptualization, measurement, and research findings. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 42, 87–110.
7.
ForchheimerM.KalpakjianC.TateD. (2004). Gender differences in community integration after spinal cord injury. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 10, 163–174.
8.
GordonW.BrownM. (1997). Community integration of individuals with spinal cord injuries. American Rehabilitation, 23, 4–11.
9.
GrayD.HendershotG. (2000). The ICIDH-2: Developments for a new era of outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, S10–S14.
10.
HammellK. (2004). Quality of life among people with high spinal cord injury living in the community. Spinal Cord, 42, 607–620.
11.
HammellK. (2007). Quality of life after spinal cord injury: A meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord, 45, 124–139.
12.
HasselkusB. (2006). 2006 Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lecture—The world of everyday occupation: Real people, real lives. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 627–640.
13.
HemmingssonH.JonssonH. (2005). The issue is—An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the international classification of functioning, disability and health—Some critical remarks. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 569–576.
14.
HurstR. (2003). The international disability rights movement and the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 572–576.
15.
ImrieR. (2004). Demystifying disability: A review of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Sociology of Health and Illness, 26, 287–305.
16.
IsakssonG.SkarL.LexellJ. (2005). Women's perceptions of changes in the social network after spinal cord injury. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27, 1013–1021.
17.
KawachiI.BerkmanL. (2003). Neighborhoods and health.New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
KrauseJ.BroderickL. (2004). Outcomes after spinal cord injury: comparisons as a function of gender and race and ethnicity. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 85, 355–362.
19.
KronenbergF.PollardN. (2005). Overcoming occupational apartheid: A preliminary exploration of the political nature of occupational therapy. In KronenbergF.AlgadoS.PollardN.PollardN. (Eds.), Occupational therapy without borders: Learning from the spirit of survivors (pp. 58–86). New York: Elsevier.
20.
LawM. (2002). Participation in the occupations of everyday life, 2002 Distinguished Scholar Lecture. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 640–649.
21.
LevinsS.RedenbachD.DyckI. (2004). Individual and societal influences on participation in physical activity following spinal cord injury: A qualitative study. Physical Therapy, 84, 496–509.
22.
LutzB.BowersB. (2005). Disability in everyday life. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1037–1054.
23.
MartzE.LivnehH.PriebeM.WuersmerL.OttomanelliL. (2005). Predictors of psychosocial adaptation among people with spinal cord injury or disorder. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 1182–1192.
24.
McCollM. A.DaviesD.CarlsonP.JohnstonJ.MinnesP. (2001). The community integration measure: Development and preliminary validation. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 82, 429–434.
25.
MinnesP.CarlsonP.McCollM. A.NolteM. L.JohnstonJ.BuellK. (2003). Community integration: A useful construct, but what does it really mean?Brain Injury, 17, 149–159.
26.
NoreauL.FougeyrollasP.BoschenK. (2002). The perceived influence of the environment on social participation among individuals with spinal cord injury. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 7, 56–72.
27.
NoreauL.FougeyrollasP.PostM.AsanoM. (2005). Participation after spinal cord injury: The evolution of conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Neurological Physical Therapy, 29, 147–156.
28.
NosekM.WalterL. (1998). Community integration of women with spinal cord injuries: An examination of psychological, social, vocational, and environmental factors. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury, 4, 41–55.
29.
PeduzziP.ConcatoJ.KemperE.HolfordT.FeinsteinA. (1996). A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49, 1373–1379.
30.
PentlandW.TremblayM.SpringK. (1999). Women and disability: Occupational impacts of aging. Journal of Occupational Science, 63, 111–123.
31.
PentlandW.WalkerJ.MinnesP.TremblayM.BrouwerB.GouldM. (2002). Women and spinal cord injury and the impact of aging. Spinal Cord, 40, 374–387.
32.
PutzkeJ.RichardsJ.HickenB.DeVivoM. (2002). Predictors of life satisfaction: A spinal cord injury cohort study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 555–561.
33.
SanderM.FuchsK.HighW.HallK.KreutzerJ.RosenthalM. (1999). The Community Integration Questionnaire revisited: An assessment of factor structure and validity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 1303–1308.
34.
ScheerJ.LuborskyM. (1991). The cultural context of polio biographies. Orthopedics, 14, 1173–81.
35.
SchulzA.WilliamsD.IsraelB.LempertL. (2002). Racial and spatial relations as fundamental determinants of health in Detroit. Milbank Quarterly, 80, 677–707.
36.
ThibodauxL. (2005). Habitus and the embodiment of disability through lifestyle. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 507–515.
37.
TownsendE.WilcockA. (2003). Occupational justice. In ChristiansenC.TownsendE. (Eds.), Introduction to occupation (pp. 243–273). Thorofare, NJ: Prentice Hall.
38.
Van BrakelW.AndersonA.MutatkarR.BakirtziefA.NichollsP.RajuM. (2006). The Participation Scale: Measuring a key concept in public health. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 193–203.
39.
van de VenL.PostM.de WitteL.van den HeuvelW. (2005). It takes two to tango: The integration of people with disabilities into society. Disability and Society, 20, 311–329.
40.
VilleI.CrostM.Ravaud J., & Tetrafigap Group. (2003). Disability and a sense of community belonging: A study among tetraplegic spinal-cord-injured persons in France. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 321–332.
41.
VilleI.WinanceM. (2006). To work or not to work? The occupational trajectories of wheelchair users. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 423–436.
42.
WhitefordG. (2003). Occupational deprivation: Global challenge in the new millennium. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 200–204.
43.
WhiteneckG.CharlifueS.GerhartK.OverholserJ.RichardsonG. (1992). Quantifying handicap: A new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73, 519–526.
44.
WhiteneckG.Harrison-FelixC.MellickD.BrooksC.CharlifueS.GerhartK. (2004). Quantifying environmental factors: A measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers. Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation, 85, 1324–1335.
45.
WhiteneckG.MeadeM.DijkersM.TateD.BushnikT.ForchheimerM. (2004). Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 1793–1803.
46.
WhiteneckG.TateD.CharlifueS. (1999). Predicting community reintegration after spinal cord injury from demographic and injury characteristics. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 1485–1491.
47.
WilkinsonR.MarmotM. (2003) Social determinants of health: The solid facts (2nd ed.). Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe.
48.
WilliamsD. (2002). Racial/ethnic variations in women's health: The social embeddedness of health. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 588–597.
49.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health — ICF.Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
