Comparing the Disability Creation Process and International Classification of Functioning,Disability and Health Models

Abstract

Background. The conceptualisation of participation is important for both clinicians and researchers. Purpose. Analyse and compare two conceptual models, the Disability Creation Process (DCP) and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), with particular emphasis on the participation component. Method. Conceptual comparative analysis of the DCP and ICF models focused on participation. Results. We found more differences than similarities between the DCP and ICF models. Similarities concerned approaches, objectives, elements of the models' components, and, to some extent, the participation component itself. Differences were mainly in the underlying models, conceptualisation of components including participation, and the measurement tools of participation. Practice Implications. Based on the results of this conceptual comparison, occupational therapists working in clinical and research settings are encouraged to consider using the DCP, which is an excellent model to choose in regard to participation. Empirical studies are still needed to clarify the concept of participation.