Background. Power wheelchairs enhance quality of life by enabling occupation, improving self-esteem and facilitating social interaction. Despite these benefits, the risks associated with power mobility use raise serious concerns in residential facilities. Purpose. As there is no gold standard to assess when a client is unsafe, a two-phase study was conducted to develop client-centred guidelines for power mobility use. Method. In the first phase of the study, presented here, 18 in-depth, qualitative interviews were conducted with a variety of stakeholders, including power mobility users, other residents, staff and family members. Results. A thematic analysis of the interviews revealed four main themes: 1) the meaning of power mobility, 2) learning the rules of the road, 3) red flags: concerns about safety, and 4) solutions. Practice Implications. Given the importance of power mobility, safety measures need to address issues of mobility and safety for power mobility drivers and those around them.
BernardH.R. (1994) The unstructured and semistructured interview. In BernardH.R., Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (pp. 208–236). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
BottosM.BolcatiC.SciutoL.RuggeriC.FeliciangeliA. (2001). Powered wheelchairs and independence in young children with tetraplegia. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 43, 769–777.
3.
BrandtA.IwarssonS.StahleA. (2004). Older people's use of powered wheelchairs for activity and participation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 36, 70–77.
4.
ButlerC. (1991). Augmentative mobility: Why do it?Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 2, 801–815.
5.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (CAOT) (1997). Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
6.
Canadian Medical Association (2000). Determining medical fitness to drive: A guideline for physicians. (6th ed.). Ottawa, ON: Canadian Medical Association.
7.
CarpenterC.HammellK.W. (2000). Evaluating qualitative research. In HammellK.W.CarpenterC.DyckI. (Eds.) Using qualitative research. A practical introduction for occupational and physical therapists (pp. 107–120). New York: Churchill Livingstone.
8.
ClarkeC.ScottE.KrupaT. (1993). Involving clients in programme evaluation and research: A new methodology for occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 185–199.
9.
DaviesA.De SouzaL.H.FrankA.O. (2003). Changes in the quality of life in severely disabled people following provision of powered indoor/outdoor chairs. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 286–290.
10.
DawsonD.ChanR.KaisermanE. (1994). Development of the power-mobility indoor driving assessment for residents of long-term care facilities: A preliminary report. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 269–276.
11.
EvansR. (2000). The effect of electrically powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs on occupation: A study of users' views. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 547–553.
12.
FineS. M.AschA. (1988). Disability beyond stigma: Social interaction, discrimination and activism. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 3–21.
13.
FrankA.O.WardJ.OrwellN.J.McCullaghC.BelcherM. (2000). Introduction of a new NHS electric powered indoor/outdoor chair (EPIOC) service: benefits, risks and implications for prescribers. Clinical Rehabilitation, 14, 665–673.
14.
FrenchS.SwainJ. (1997). Changing disability research: Participating and emancipatory research with disabled people. Physiotherapy, 83, 26–32.
15.
GitlinL.N.LuborskyM.R.SchemmR.L. (1998). Emerging concerns of older stroke patients about assistive device use. The Gerontologist, 38, 169–180.
16.
HammellK.W. (2001) Using qualitative research to inform the client-centred practice evidenced based practice of occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 228–234.
17.
HammersleyM.AtkinsonP. (1995). Ethnography. Principles in practice (2nd ed.) New York: Routledge.
18.
HendricksonR.M. (1999). Use of personal-powered vehicles in a nursing facility. Annals of Long-Term Care, 7, 149–152.
19.
HicksC.M. (1999) The Delphi Technique. In Research methods for clinical therapists (pp. 243–249). Toronto, ON: Churchill Livingstone.
20.
HobsonS. J. G. (1999a). Using the client-centred approach with persons with cognitive impairment. In SumsionT. (Ed.), Client-centred practice in occupational therapy: A guide to implementation (pp. 51–60). Toronto, ON: Churchill Livingstone.
21.
HobsonS. J. G. (1999b). Using the client-centred approach with elderly people. In SumsionT. (Ed.), Client-centred practice in occupational therapy: A guide to implementation (pp. 61–74). Toronto, ON: Churchill Livingstone.
22.
KlavoraP.YoungM.HeslegraveR.J. (2000). A review of a major driver rehabilitation centre: A ten-year client profile. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 128–134.
23.
Korner-BitenskyN.SoferS.KaizerF.GelinasI.TalbotL. (1994). Assessing the ability to drive following an acute neurological event: are we on the right road?Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 141–148.
LettsL.DawsonD.Kaiserman-GoldensteinE. (1998). Development of the power-mobility community driving assessment. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 11, 123–129.
26.
LewisB.R. (1997). ATLAS/ti and NUD IST: A comparative review of two leading qualitative data analysis packages. Cultural Anthropology Methods, 10 (3), 41–47.
27.
LloydS.CormackC.N.BlaisK.MesseriG.McCallumM.A.SpicerK., (2001). Driving and dementia: A review of the literature. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68, 149–156.
28.
MattinglyC. (1998). Healing dramas and clinical plots. The narrative structure of experience. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Miles-TappingC.MacDonaldL.J. (1994). Lifestyle implications of power mobility. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 12 (4), 31–49.
30.
MuhrT. (1997) Scientific software development's Atlas.ti. The knowledge workbench. Short user's manual. Berlin, Germany: Thomas Muhr, Scientific Software Development.
31.
OliverM. (1990). The politics of disablement. Basingstroke, Hampshire, England: MacMillan.
32.
PerreaultJ.Population projections for Canada. Provinces and territories. 1989–2011 (p. 107). Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada. 1990.
33.
ReedR.L.YochumK.SchlossM. (1993). Platform motorized wheelchairs in congregate care centers: A survey of usage and safety. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 101–103.
34.
SchererM.J. (2001). Measuring subjective quality of life following spinal cord injury: A validation study of the assistive technology device predisposition assessment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33, 387–393.
35.
StantonS. (2000). Client-partner relationships post stroke: exploring the perspectives of couples. In HammellK.W.CarpenterC.DyckI. (Eds.), Using qualitative research. A practical introduction for occupational and physical therapists (pp. 47–58). New York: Churchill Livingstone.
36.
StrongS.RigbyP.StewartD.LawM.LettsL.CooperB. (1999). Application of the Person-Environment-Occupation model: A practical tool. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66, 122–133.
37.
TownsendE. (1998). Good intentions overruled: A critique of empowerment in the routine organisation of mental health services. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
38.
World Health Organisation. (2001). The international classification of impairment, disability and handicap. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
39.
WhitefordG. (2000). Occupational deprivation: Global challenge in the new millennium. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 200–204.
40.
von ZweckC. (1999) The promotion of evidence-based occupational therapy practice in Canada. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66, 208–213.
41.
ZolaI.K. (1985). Depictions of disability - metaphor, message, and medium in the media: A research and political agenda. The Social Science Journal, 22 (4), 5–17.
42.
ZolaI.K. (1991). Bringing our bodies and ourselves back in: Reflections on a past, present and future “medical sociology.”Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 32, 1–16.
