Background. The notion of universalism was introduced to me during my first year of PhD studies in Rehabilitation Science. During a class discussion, we debated the merits of two theoretical perspectives that offered contradicting views as to the most effective means to facilitating a shift in societal perceptions of disability. As exemplified by the World Health Organization's current model of health, the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), there has been a shift from a minority group analysis towards a universalistic perspective of disablement. Purpose. This paper introduces readers to the underlying concepts of both minority group analysis and universalism and, in doing so, proposes that universalism is closely aligned with the underlying constructs of occupational therapy. Universalism provides a comprehensive framework that can be utilized by occupational therapists to encourage the development of health and social-related policies that promote inclusiveness, yet still the respect the differences that exist among individuals. Practice Implications. By improving their familiarity with such theories, occupational therapists may be better positioned to contribute to policy development within their respective treatment and/or community settings.
BickenbachJ.E.ChatterjiS.BadleyE.M.UstunT.B. (1999). Models of disablement, universalism and international classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 1173–1187.
2.
DeWolfeP. (2002). Private tragedy in social context? Reflections on disability, illness, and suffering. Disability and Society, 17, 255–267.
3.
DunnW.BrownC.McGuiganA. (1994). The ecology of human performance: A framework for considering the effect of context. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 595–607.
4.
HahnH. (1988). The politics of physical differences: Disability and discrimination. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 39–47.
5.
LawM.BaptisteS.MillsJ. (1995). Client-centred practice: What does it mean and does it make a difference?Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 250–257.
6.
LawM.PolatajkoH.BaptisteS.TownsendE. (1997). Core concepts of occupational therapy. In Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (ed.), Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective (pp. 29–56). Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications.
7.
LawM.SteinwenderS.LeClairL. (1998). Occupation, health, and well-being. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 81–91.
8.
MichilinP.M.Juarez-MarazzoS. (2001). Ableism: Social work practice with individuals with physical disabilities. In ApplebyG. A.ColonE.HamiltonJ. (Eds.), Diversity, oppression, and social functioning: Person-in-environment assessment and intervention (pp. 179–194). Toronto, ON: Allyn and Bacon.
9.
PolatajkoH.J. (1992). Naming and framing occupational therapy: A lecture dedicated to the life of Nancy B. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 189–199.
StewartD. (2002). The new ICF: International classification of functioning, disability and health. Concepts and implementation issues for occupational therapists. Occupational Therapy Now, 4 (4), 17–21.
14.
VrkljanB.H.Miller-PolgarJ. (2001). Meaning of occupational engagement in life-threatening illness: A qualitative pilot project. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68, 237–246.
15.
ZolaI. K. (1989). Toward the necessary universalizing of disability policy. The Millbank Quarterly, 67, 401–428.
16.
BarnesC. (2000). A working social model? Disability, work and disability politics in the 21st centre. Critical Social Policy, 20, 441–457.
17.
GradyA. P. (1995). Building an inclusive community: A challenge for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 300–310.
18.
PendlandW.KrupaT.LynchS.ClarkC. (1992). Community integration for persons with disabilities: Working together to make it happen. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 127–130.
19.
PolatajkoH.J. (1992). Naming and framing occupational therapy: A lecture dedicated to the life of Nancy B. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 189–199.
20.
TownsendE. (1993). Muriel Driver Lecture: Occupational therapy's social vision. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 174–184.
