Background. Recruitment issues in occupational therapy have been a long-standing concern for the profession. Purpose. This descriptive study explored the strategies currently being used by employers to recruit occupational therapists for employment purposes. Method. An 18-item survey was mailed to 251 sites where occupational therapists work in Alberta and Saskatchewan. Results. There was a 64% response rate and data from 130 surveys were analyzed. The results indicate that employers continue to rely on a wide variety of strategies for advertising and recruiting, the most prevalent being word of mouth, postings at universities, and providing student fieldwork placements. In turn, the most effective recruitment strategies were listed as word of mouth, advertising in the general media, and providing student fieldwork placements. Various examples of financial incentives offered by employers were also listed. Many participants identified recent changes in recruitment strategies such as making a move towards web site job postings. Practice Implications. The results suggest strategies for employers to target for recruiting occupational therapists and illustrate to both employers and students the importance of fieldwork in recruitment and hiring.
BentA. (1999). Allied health in Central Australia: Challenges and rewards in remote area practice. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 45, 203–212.
2.
BorikarV.GoodbanA. (1989). Recruitment: An investigation into recruitment problems in occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 392–4.
3.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (2001). The education, supply and distribution of occupational therapists in Canada. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
4.
ChristieB.JoyceP.MoellerP. (1985). Fieldwork experience, part I: Impact on practice preference. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, 671–674.
5.
CroweM. J.MackenzieL. (2002). The influence of fieldwork on the preferred future practice areas of final year occupational therapy students. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 49, 25–36.
6.
CusickA.DemattiaT.DoyleS. (1993). Occupational therapy in mental health: Factors influencing student practice preference, Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 12, 33–53.
7.
EzerskyS.HavazeletL.ScottA.ZettlerC. (1989). Specialty choice in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43, 227–233.
8.
FergusonM.RuggS. (2000). Advertising for and recruiting basic grade occupational therapists in the United Kingdon. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 583–590.
9.
GilbertJ.StrongJ. (2000). Clinical placement in mental health: Effects on the attitudes of students. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 16, 45–58.
10.
HaimanS. (1990). Education and enticement: A recruitment strategy. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health. 10 (1) ix–xvi.
11.
JonesW.JohnsonJ.A.BeasleyL.JohnsonJ.P. (1996). Allied health workforce shortages: The systemic barriers to response. Journal of Allied Health, 25, 219–232.
12.
LansdowneJ. (1989). To rotate or not to rotate: That is the question. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 4–7.
13.
LewickiE.SmithS.CashS.MadiganM.SimonsD. (1999). Factors influencing practice area preference in occupational therapy. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 14, 1–19.
14.
MacKinnonJ.R. (1985). Current supply and future requirements for occupational therapy manpower in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 251–257.
15.
MirkopoulosC.QuinnB. (1989). Occupational therapy manpower: Ontario's critical shortage. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 73–79.
16.
MorrisL.V. (1989). Occupational therapy: A study of supply and demand in Georgia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43, 234–239.
17.
MulhollandS.DerdallM. (2004). Exploring what employers seek when hiring occupational therapists. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71223–229.
18.
OkerlundV.JacksonP.ParsonsR.ComsaM. (1995). Job recruitment and retention factors for occupational therapists in Utah. American Journal of Occupational therapy, 49, 263–265.
19.
PolatajkoH.QuintynM. (1986). Factors affecting occupational therapy job site selection in under serviced areas. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 151–157.
20.
RussellM.ClarkM.BarneyT. (1996). Changes in attitudes and skills among occupational therapy students attending a rural fieldwork unit. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 43, 72–78.
21.
SalvatoriP.WilliamsR.PolatajkoH.MacKinnonJ. (1992). The manpower shortage in occupational therapy: Implications for Ontario. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 40–51.
22.
ShepherdD. (1990). The collaborative roles of universities and hospitals in addressing the allied health manpower shortage. Journal of Allied Health, Fall, 287–295.
23.
SmithP.SchillerR.GrantH.K.SachsL. (1995). Recruitment and retention strategies used by occupational therapy directors in acute care, rehabilitation, and long-term-care settings. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 412–418.
24.
SolomonP.SalvatoriP.BerryS. (2001). Perceptions of important retention and recruitment factors by therapists in northwestern Ontario. Journal of Rural Health, 17, 278–285.
25.
von ZweckC. (2003). Becoming an employer of choice: a workplace solution to recruiting and retaining occupational therapists. Occupational Therapy Now, March/April, 12–15.
26.
WilkinsS.RosenthalC. (2001). Career choices: A comparison of two occupational therapy practice groups. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68, 29–40.
27.
WittmanP.SwinehartS.CahillR.MichelG. (1989). Variables affecting specialty choice in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43, 602–606.
28.
WolfendenK.BlanchardP.ProbstS., (1995). Recruitment and Retention: Perceptions of rural mental health workers. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 4, 89–95.
29.
World Federation of Occupational therapists. (2002). Minimum standards for the education of occupational therapists. Australia: World Federation of Occupational Therapists.
