American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA). (1995). Position paper: Occupation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 1015–1018.
2.
Association canadienne des ergothérapeutes (ACE). (1997). Promouvoir l'occupation: une perspective de l'ergothérapie. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
3.
BircherA. U. (1975). On the development and classification of diagnoses. Nursing Forum, 14, 10–29.
4.
BloomB. S.EngelhartM. D.FurstE. J.HillW. H. & KrathwohlD. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I — Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.
5.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (CAOT). (1997). Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
6.
ChristiansenC. & BaumC. (1997). Person-environment occupation performance: A conceptual model for practice. In ChristiansenC. & BaumC. (Eds.), Occupational therapy: Enabling function and well-being (2nd ed., pp. 47–70). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
7.
DunlopW. J. (1933). A brief history of occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1, 6–11.
8.
HagedornR. (2000). Tools for practice in occupational therapy: A structured approach to core skills and processes. Toronto, ON: Harcourt Publishers.
9.
HannamD. (1997). More than a cup of tea: Meaning construction in an everyday occupation. Journal of Occupational Science: Australia, 4 (2), 69–74.
10.
KerlingerF. N. (1979). Behavioral research: A conceptual approach. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
11.
KerlingerF. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
12.
KrathwohlD. R.BloomB. S. & MasiaB. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook II — Affective domain. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
13.
LawM.CooperB.StrongS.StewartD.RigbyP. & LettsL. (1996). The person-environment-occupation model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 9–23.
14.
LepleyC. J. (1998). Problem-solving tools for analyzing system problems: The affinity map and the relationship diagram. Journal of Nursing Administration, 28 (12), 44–50.
15.
NelsonD. L. (1996). Therapeutic occupation: A definition. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 775–782.
16.
NelsonD. L. (1997). The 1996 Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lecture: Why the profession of occupational therapy will flourish in the 21st century. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 11–24.
17.
PierceD. (2001). Untangling occupation and activity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 138–146.
18.
PolatajkoH. J. (1992). Muriel Driver Lecture 1992: Naming and framing occupational therapy: A lecture dedicated to the life of Nancy B. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 189–200.
19.
PolatajkoH. J. (1992). Muriel Driver Lecture: Naming and framing occupational therapy: A lecture dedicated to the life of Nancy B. Revue canadienne d'ergothérapie, 59, 200.
20.
PolatajkoH. J. (2001). National perspective: The evolution of our occupational perspective: The journey from diversion through therapeutic use to enablement. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68, 203–207.
21.
PolatajkoH. J. (2001). Perspective nationale: L'évolution de notre perspective sur l'occupation: un périple passant de la thérapie récréative à l'utilisation thérapeutique de l'activité jusqu'à la promotion de l'occupation. Revue canadienne d'ergothérapie, 68, 203–207.
22.
ReynoldsP.D. (1971). A primer in theory construction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.