Backround. Canadian occupational therapists practice in a variety of clinical settings and use different assessment approaches. To understand best practice, this study explored therapists' knowledge use for infant feeding assessments. This was chosen as one specific area of practice to study knowledge use. Purpose. The purpose of this qualtitative study was to investigate what therapists assess and what procedures they use to carry out their assessments. Method. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 therapists with experience evaluating infant feeding. A constant comparative method of data analysis was used to identify common themes. Results. Three themes emerged: the value of medical information, the importance of doing by observing and the need for an adaptive trial and error approach. Practice Implications. These findings suggest therapists' experiential knowledge shape their best practice. This study informs us about the everyday knowledge used by therapists working with infants on feeding issues and helps us to understand why assessment practices may vary amongst therapists and across clinical settings.
BennerP. (1994). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
BowmanO. J. (1990). Balancing art and science and private and public knowledge: A matrix for successful practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44, 583–587.
3.
BraunM. A. & PalmerM. M. (1985). A pilot study of oral-motor dysfunction in “at-risk” infants. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Paediatrics, 5, 13–25.
4.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, Association of Canadian Occupational Therapy University Programs, Association of Canadian Occupational Therapy Regulatory Organizations, & Presidents' Advisory Committee. (1999). Joint position statement on evidence-based occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66, 267–269.
5.
CarperB. A. (1978). Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 1 (1), 13–23.
6.
CorbinJ. & StraussA. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13 (1), 3–21.
7.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
8.
DreyfusH. L. & DreyfusS. E. (1996). The relationship of theory and practice in the acquisition of skill. In BennerP. A., TannerC. A., & CheslaC. A. (Eds.). Expertise in nursing practice: caring, clinical judgment and ethics (pp. 29–47). New York: Springer Publishing.
9.
DubignonJ. & CooperD. (1980). Good and poor feeding behaviour in the neonatal period. Infant Behaviour and Development, 3, 395–408.
10.
EllisonS. L.VidyasagarD. & AndersonG. C. (1979). Sucking in the newborn infant during the first hour of life. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, 24 (6), 18–25.
11.
ErringtonE. & RobertsonL. (1998). Promoting staff development in occupational therapy: a reflective group approach. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 497–503.
12.
GlaserB. G. & StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, Il: Aldine.
13.
GlassR. P. & WolfL. S. (1994). A global perspective on feeding assessment in the neonatal intensive care unit. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 514–526.
14.
GubaE. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Resources Information Center Annual Review Paper, 29, 75–91.
15.
KreftingL. (1991). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 214–222.
16.
LincolnY. S. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 275–289.
17.
LincolnY. S. & GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
McGowanJ. S.MarshR. R.FowlerS. M.LevyS. E. & StallingsV. A. (1991). Developmental patterns of normal nutritive sucking in infants. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 33, 891–897.
19.
Medoff-CooperB.WeiningerS. & ZukowsyK. (1989). Neonatal sucking as a clinical assessment tool: liminary findings. Nursing Research, 38, 162–165.
20.
MochS. D. (1990). Personal knowing: evolving research and practice. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 4, 155–165.
21.
MorrisS. E. & KleinM. D. (1987). Pre-feeding skills: A comprehensive resource for feeding development. Tucson, Arizona: Therapy Skill Builders.
22.
PalmerM. M.CrawleyK. & BlancoI. A. (1993). Neonatal oral-motor assessment scale: A reliability study. Journal of Perinatology, 13 (1), 28–35.
23.
PollittE.ConsolazioB. & GoodkinF. (1981). Changes in nutritive sucking during a feed in two-day and thirty-day-old infants. Early Human Development, 5, 201–210.
24.
SaylorC. R. (1990). Reflection and professional education: Art, science and competency. Nurse Educator, 15 (2), 8–11.
25.
SchonD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
26.
SchonD. A. (1990). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
27.
SeidelJ. (1998). The Ethnograph v5.0: A User's Guide: Qualis Research Associates, Scolari Sage Publications Software.
28.
StewardB. (1996). The theory/practice divide: Bridging the gap in occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 264–268.
29.
WeberF.WoolridgeM. W. & BaumJ. D. (1986). An ultrasonographic study of the organization of sucking and swallowing by newborn infants. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 28, 19–24.
30.
WolfL. S. & GlassR. P. (1992). Feeding and swallowing disorders in infancy: assessment and management. San Antonio, Texas: Therapy Skill Builders.
