Background. Most health care professions are reviewing issues related to the changing nature of professional education and practice. Social work, physical therapy, speech-language pathology, audiology, and recently occupational therapy, have raised the entry-level training requirements to the graduate level to enhance formal education programs. Purpose and Scope. In the past few years, this trend has generated considerable debate and discussion within the occupational therapy profession both in Canada and internationally. In November, 2001 the Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (CAOT) announced that Canadian universities must convert to entry-level Master's programs by 2008 to receive re-accreditation (CAOT, 2002a). This paper describes the historical evolution of Canadian occupational therapy education, outlines several issues within occupational therapy that are impacting the move, and discusses benefits and challenges to Master's level training. Practice Implications. Recommendations are presented for the development of Master's entry-level occupational therapy training programs in Canada.
AllenS.StrongJ. & PolatajkoH.J. (2001). Graduate-entry Master's degrees: Launch pad for occupational therapy in this millennium?British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 572–576.
2.
American Occupational Therapy Association. (1998). Post baccalaureate entry level: Task force shares feedback. OT Week, 12, 14–15.
BaptisteSue. (2001). Personal reflections on occupational therapy education. The Link, 67, 1–2.
6.
BerndJ. (1969). Executive secretary/consultant's report. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36, 149–153.
7.
BrayleyC.R. (1996). From clinician to academician: A handbook for those who aspire to become faculty members. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
8.
BrintnellE.S. (1985). Career planning in OT. I want up, not out. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 227–233.
9.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1986). Standards for the accreditation of occupational therapy educational programs. Toronto, ON: Author.
10.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1990). Position statement: Graduate education. Toronto, ON: Author.
11.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1999). How far we've come … some quick comparisons from ten years ago. OT Now, 1, 25.
12.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (2001a). Position statement on entry-level education of occupational therapists to the profession in Canada. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68, 135–137.
13.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (2001b). CAOT statistics track trends in occupational therapy. OT Now, 3, 27.
14.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (2001c). Report on the professional issue forum on entry-level education held in Calgary, May, 2001. Web site: http://www.caot.ca./index.cfm?ChangeID=330&pageID=338
15.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (2001d). Fact sheet on changes to educational requirements: CAOT announces new educational requirement for academic accreditation effective 2008. Web site: http://www.caot.ca/index.cfm?ChangeID=20&pageID=547.
16.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (2002a). New educational requirement as of 2010. OT Now, 4, 18–19.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (2002c). Entry-level education of occupational therapists in Canada. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69, 115–119.
19.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (2002d). CAOT announces professional Master's degree as entry requirement starting 2010. Web site: http://www.caot.ca/pdfs/mastersentryfacts.pdf.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (2002f). Canadian occupational therapy university program: Entry-level programs. Web site: http://www.caot.ca/pdfs/programprereqs.pdf.
22.
ClarkF.SharrotG.HillD.J. & CampbellS. (1985). A comparison of impact of undergraduate and graduate occupational therapy education on professional productivity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, 155–162.
23.
CockburnL. (2001a). The greater the barrier, the greater the success: CAOT during the 1940's. OT Now, 3, 15–18.
24.
CockburnL. (2001b). The professional era: CAOT in the 1950's & 1960's. OT Now, 3, 5–9.
25.
CockburnL. (2001c). Change, expansion and reorganization: CAOT in the 1970's. OT Now, 3, 3–6.
26.
ColmanW. (1986). History of the formation of educational values in occupational therapy. In American Occupational Therapy Association (Ed.), Occupational Therapy Education: Target 2000. (pp. 12–18), Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
27.
ConineT.A.ShillingL.M. & PierceE.R. (1985). The relative importance of supportive data for promotion and tenure reviews. Journal of Allied Health, 14, 183–190.
28.
FriedlandJ.RobinsonI. & CardwellT. (2001). In the beginning: CAOT from 1926–1939. OT Now, 3, 15–18, 26.
29.
GilkensonG. & HantenW. (1984). A comparative analysis of occupational therapy graduates from baccalaureate & entry-level master's degree programs. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 4, 67–95.
30.
GilletteN. (1978). Practice, education and research. In American Occupational Therapy Association (Ed.), Occupational Therapy: 2001. (pp. 18–25), Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
31.
GrantH. (1986). The role of education in the development of a profession. In American Occupational Therapy Association (Ed.), Occupational Therapy Education: Target 2000. (pp. 6–11), Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
32.
HagedornR. (2001). Foundations for practice in occupational therapy. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone.
33.
HopkinsH. (1983). An historical perspective on occupational therapy. In HopkinsH.L. & SmithH. D. (Eds.), Willard and Spackman's Occupational Therapy. (6th ed.). (pp. 3–23). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: J.B. Lippincott.
34.
HarrisC. HughesBraymanS.ClarkF.DelaneyJ. & MillerR. (1998). COE recommends postbaccalaureate OT education. OT Week, 12, 18 & 21.
35.
IglarshZ.A. (1998). Keeping the faith. Rehab Management: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Rehabilitation, 11, 24–26.
36.
LubinskiR. & FrattaliC. (1993). Nursing home reform: The resident assessment instrument. ASHA, 35, 59–62.
37.
MakelyS. (1998). Multiskilled health care workers: Issues and approaches to cross-training. Bloomington, IN: Pine Ridge Publications.
38.
MasagataniG. N. & GrantH.K. (1986). Managing an academic career. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 83–88.
39.
MaxwellJ.D. & MaxwellM.P. (1977). Occupational therapy: The diffident profession. Ottawa, ON: Health and Welfare Canada (Project # 606-1242-46).
40.
MendezM.A. (1982). A chronicle of the World Federation of Occupational Therapists: The first thirty years 1952–1982. Jerusalem, Israel: World Federation of Occupational Therapists.
41.
MoseyA.C. (1998). The competent scholar. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 760–764.
42.
Ontario Society of Occupational Therapists (OSOT). (2001). OSOT celebrates 80 years of service. The Link, 64, 1 & 11.
43.
PackerT. L. & StickneyJ. (1991). Advanced diploma in occupational therapy: A comparison of therapists before and after. New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 3–7.
44.
ParhamD. (1985). Academic reward structures and occupational therapy faculty. Part II: Predictors of rewards and scholarly productivity. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 5, 137–153.
45.
PierceD.JacksonJ.Rogosky-GrassiM.ThompsonM.E. & MenningerB. (1987). The possible effects of a change to Master's entry level in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41, 658–666.
46.
PolatajkoH.PolgarJ.M. & CookJ. (1999). Master's level entry programmes in occupational therapy: Visionary or reflective of the profession's coming of age?OT Now, 1, 7.
47.
PosthumaB.W. & NohS. (1991). Faculty recruitment: Where are the applicants?Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 189–195.
48.
RogersJ.BrayleyR. & CoxR. (1988). The educational preparation and professional activities of occupational therapists. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 642–646.
49.
RogersJ.C. & MannW.C. (1980). The relationship between professional productivity and educational level, part 2. Results and discussion. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34, 460–468.
50.
RoyeenC., (1986). The issue is: Entry level education in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 425–427.
51.
RoyeenC. & StohsS.J. (1999). Should the clinical doctorate degree be the standard of entry into the practice of occupational therapy. In CristP.A. (Ed.), Innovations in occupational therapy education 1999 (pp. 171–177). Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc.
52.
RunyonC. P.AitkenM. J. & StohsS.J. (1994). Commentary: The need for a clinical doctorate in occupational therapy (OTD). Journal of Allied Health, 23, 57–63.
53.
RyanS. J. & StanL.J. (1982/3). The degree/diploma dilemma. New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy. 33, 10–15.
54.
SalvatoriP. (1998). Master's entry level education in occupational therapy in Canada. The Link, 49, 3.
55.
SteibP. (1999). RA makes history: Resolution J adopted. OT Week, 13, 1, 3.
56.
StormW. (1990). The relationship of educational level to the development and dissemination of knowledge by occupational therapists. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44, 39–46.
57.
TrenthamB. (2001). Diffident no longer: Building structures for a proud profession. OT Now, 3, 3–7.
58.
WallsB.S. (1999). What does Resolution J mean to the profession?OT Practice, 4, 13, 15.
59.
WatersB. (2000). Master's degrees as a pre-registration qualification: a need for caution?British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 500–502.
60.
WestW. (1978). Historical perspectives. In American Occupational Therapy Association (Ed.), Occupational Therapy: 2001. (pp. 9–17), Rockville, MD: Author.
61.
ZimolagU.FrenchN. & PatersonM. (2002). Striving for professional excellence: The role of evidence-based practice and professional artistry. OT Now, 4, 8–10.
