Background. This study explored the perceptions and experiences of teenagers with physical disabilities attending regular secondary schools. In particular, the study focused on social integration and the factors that influenced it. Social integration was defined as a sense of belonging in the school community. Methods. A phenomenological approach was used to explore the viewpoint of physically disabled young people themselves. Seven secondary school students with ambulation disabilities were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. Results. The findings identified both factors that facilitated and those that limited integration. Extrinsic factors included peer and staff support, negative reactions and inaccessible activities. Intrinsic factors included the disability itself, as well as strategies of self-exclusion, masking the disability, finding a niche, making fun of the disability, and educating peers. Interpretation of the findings suggested that the participants occupied a secondary place in their schools, as opposed to being fully integrated. Practice Implications. Occupational therapists have the opportunity, expertise and responsibility to be instrumental in the process of ensuring that schools are inclusive and that their young clients are capable of participating fully.
AppletonP.MinchomP.EllisN.ElliottC.BollV. & JonesP. (1994). The self-concept of young people with spina bifida: A population-based study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 36, 198–215.
2.
ArmstrongR.W.RosenbaumP.L. & KingS. (1992). Self-perceived social function among disabled children in regular classrooms. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 13, 11–16.
3.
BallardK. (1993). A socio-political perspective on disability: Research and institutional disabilism. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 28, 89–103.
4.
BerryJ. (1984). Cultural relations in plural society: Alternatives to segregation and their sociopsychological implications. In MillerN. & BrewerM.B. (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 11–27). San Fransisco, CA: Academic Press.
5.
BlumR.W. (1991). Overview of transition issues for youth with disabilities. Pediatrician, 18, 101–104.
6.
BlumR.W.ResnickM.D.NelsonR. & St. GermaineA. (1991). Family and peer issues among adolescents with spina bifida and cerebral palsy. Pediatrics, 88, 280–285.
7.
BowdA.D. (1992). Integration and mainstreaming in cultural context: Canadian and American approaches. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 39, 19–31.
8.
BrasileF. (1990). Wheelchair sports: A new perspective on integration. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 7, 3–11.
9.
BuellM.K. & MinnesP.M. (1994). An acculturation perspective on deinstitutionalization and service delivery. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 3, 94–107.
10.
ChristiansenC. & BaumC. (1997). Occupational therapy: Enabling function and well-being. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
11.
DavisS.E.BergerK.AndersonC.FeinsteinC. & LinkowskiD.C. (1991). Developmental tasks and transitions of adolescents with chronic illnesses and disabilities. In MarinelliR.P. & Del OrtoA.D. (Eds.), The psychological and social impact of disability (pp. 70–80). New York: Springer Publishing.
12.
DawkinsJ. (1996). Bullying, physical disability and the pediatric patient. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 38, 603–612.
13.
DudgeonB.MassagliT. & RossB. (1997). Educational participation of children with spinal cord injury. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 553–561.
14.
ErwinP. (1993). Friendship and peer relations in children. New York: John Whiley & Sons.
15.
GradyA.P. (1995). Building inclusive community: A challenge for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 300–310.
16.
GoodmanG. & YasumuraK. (1992). Physically handicapped children adrift in the mainstream: A call for a transdisciplinary physical management curriculum. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 15, 345–348.
17.
HahnH. (1993). The politics of physical differences: Disability and discrimination. In NaglerM. (Ed.), Perspectives on disability (pp. 118–123). Palo Alto, CA: Health Markets Research.
18.
HemmingssonH. & BorellL. (2000). Accommodation needs and student-environment fit in upper secondary schools for students with severe physical disabilities. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 162–172.
19.
JamiesonM.HutchinsonN.TaylorJ.FallonK.BergD.BoyceW. & TsimicalisA. (2001, May). Social participation of three adolescents with physical disabilities in inclusive high schools: Preliminary findings. Paper presented at the XXIV Canadian Society for the Study of Education (CSSE) Annual Conference, Quebec, PQ.
20.
JamiesonM.HutchinsonN.TaylorJ.FallonK.BergD. & BoyceW. (2002, May). Perspectives on the social participation and friendships of adolescents with physical disabilities: Adolescent and adult focus groups. Paper presented at the XXIV Canadian Society for the Study of Education (CSSE) Annual Conference, Toronto, ON.
21.
KarnilowiczW.SparrowW.A. & ShinkfieldA.J. (1994). High school students' attitudes toward performing social behaviors with mentally retarded and physically disabled peers. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9 (5), 65–80.
22.
KielhofnerG. (1995). A model of human occupation: Theory and application. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.
23.
KingG.SchultzI.SteelK.GilpinM. & CathersT. (1993). Self-evaluation and self-concept of adolescents with physical disabilities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 132–140.
24.
KokkonenJ.SaukkonenA.L.TimonenE.SerloW. & KinnunenP. (1991). Social outcomes of handicapped children as adults. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 33, 1095–1100.
25.
KreftingL. (1991). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 214–222.
26.
KuncN. (1992). The need to belong: Rediscovering Maslow's hierarchy of needs. In VillaR.A., ThousandJ.S., StainbackW., & StainbackS. (Eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective education: An administrative guide to creating heterogeneous schools (pp. 25–39). Baltimore, MA: Paul H. Brookes.
LawM.CooperB.StrongS.StewartD.RigbyP. & LettsL. (1996). The person-environment-occupation model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 9–23.
29.
LawM. & DunnW. (1993). Perspectives on understanding and changing the environments of children with disabilities. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 13 (3), 1–17.
30.
LawrenceB. (1991). Self-concept formation and physical handicap: Some educational implications for education. Disability, Handicap & Society, 6 (2), 139–146.
31.
LlewellynA. (1995). The abuse of children with physical disabilities in mainstream schooling. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 37, 740–743.
32.
LordJ.VarzosN.BehrmanB.WicksJ. & WicksD. (1990). Implications of mainstreaming classrooms for adolescents with spina bifida. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 32, 20–29.
33.
MulcaheyM. J. (1992). Returning to school after a spinal cord injury: Perspectives from four adolescents. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 305–312.
34.
OlkinR. & HowsonL. (1994). Attitudes toward and images of physical disability. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9 (5), 81–96.
35.
OrrC. & SchkadeJ. (1997). The impact of the classroom environment on defining function in school-based practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 64–69.
36.
PaulS. (1999). Students with disabilities in post-secondary education: The perspectives of wheelchair users. Occupational Therapy International, 6 (2), 90–109.
37.
ParmenterT.R. & KnoxM. (1991). The post-school experiences of young people with a disability. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 14, 281–291.
38.
PattonM. O. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
39.
PellegrinoL. (1995). Cerebral palsy: A paradigm for developmental disabilities. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 37, 834–839.
40.
PollockN. & StewartD. (1990). A survey of activity patterns and vocational readiness of young adults with physical disabilities. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 4, 17–26.
41.
PollockN.StewartD.LawM.Sahagian-WhalenS.HarveyS. & ToalC. (1997). The meaning of play for young people with physical disabilities. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 25–31.
42.
PrellwitzM. & TammM. (2000). How children with restricted mobility perceive their school environment. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 7, 165–173.
43.
ResnickM. (1984). The social construction of disability. In BlumR.W. (Ed.), Chronic illness and disabilities in childhood and adolescence (pp. 29–46). Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.
44.
ShulmanS. (1993). Close relationships and coping behavior in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 16, 267–283.
45.
SleeR. (1993). The politics of integration: New sites for old practices. Disability, Handicap and Society, 8, 351–360.
46.
StainbackS. & StainbackW. (1990). Inclusive schooling. In StainbackW. & StainbackS. (Eds.), Support networks for inclusive schooling: Interdependent integrated education (pp. 3–23). Baltimore, MA: Paul H. Brookes.
47.
StevensS.E.SteeleC.A.JutaiJ.W.KalninsiI.V.BorolussiJ.A. & BiggarW.D. (1996). Adolescents with physical disabilities: Some psychosocial aspects of health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 19, 157–164.
48.
StraussA. & CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
49.
StraxT.E. (1991). Psychosocial issues faced by adolescents and young adults with disabilities. Pediatric Annals, 20, 507–511.
50.
YukerH.E. (1994). Variables that influence attitudes toward people with disabilities: Conclusions from the data. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9 (5), 3–22.
