Different funding and cost-control mechanisms in Canada and the United States of America (USA) have a powerful influence on occupational therapy practice in each country. Canada's public health insurance system emphasizes access to health care services based on medical need. Costs are controlled at the provincial government level by limiting the capacity of facilities and personnel. Occupational therapists in publicly-funded settings have considerable professional autonomy to use occupational therapy theoretical models and to be client-centred. The measurement of outcomes is not always required and the interventions of individual occupational therapists are infrequently scrutinized. The USA has no universal, publicly-funded, comprehensive health insurance. Health care policies are driven by financial priorities and cost control occurs at the service delivery level. Insurance companies define the scope of occupational therapy practice by identifying what services they will pay for and they scrutinize occupational therapy interventions. The emphasis on effectiveness and efficiency leads to critical examination of interventions by therapists. Canadian occupational therapists can learn much from their colleagues in the USA in this area.
American Medical Rehabilitation Providers' Association (1998). Report of the American Medical Rehabilitation Providers' Association task force on a prospective payment system for inpatient rehabilitation. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Occupational Therapy Association (1990). Membership numbers. Unpublished document. Washington, DC.: Author.
3.
ArmstrongP.ArmstrongH. (1996). Wasting away: The undermining of Canadian health care. Toronto, ON: Oxford University Press.
4.
BaumC. (1998). Client-centred practice in a changing health care system. In LawM. (Ed), Client centered occupational therapy (pp. 29–45) Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
5.
British Columbia Ministry of Health (1998). Review of continuing care services. Victoria, BC: Author.
6.
BurkeJ.P.CassidyJ.C. (1991). The issue is: Disparity between reimbursement-driven practice and humanistic values of occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 173–176.
7.
BurkeJ.P.KernS.B. (1996). Is the use of life history and narrative in clinical practice reimbursable? Is it occupational therapy?American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 389–392.
8.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists & Department of National Health and Welfare (1983). Guidelines for the client-centered practice of occupational therapy. Ottawa, ON: Author.
9.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1997). Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
10.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (1998). Membership numbers. Unpublished document. Ottawa, ON.
11.
College of Occupational Therapists of British Columbia. (2000). Bylaws. Vancouver, BC: Author.
12.
CrichtonA.JongbloedL. (1998). Disability and social policy in Canada. York, ON: Captus Press.
13.
EvansR. (2000). Two systems in restraint: Contrasting experiences with cost control in the 1990s. In ThomasD. (Ed). Canada and the United States: Differences that count. (pp. 21–51) Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.
14.
FisherA. (1992). Functional measures, Part 2: Selecting the right test, minimizing the limitations. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 278–281.
15.
FriedsonE. (1990, August). Power is plural. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Washington, DC.
16.
FuchsV. (1997). Managed care and merger mania. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, 920–921.
17.
Government of Canada. (1984). The Canada Health Act. Ottawa, ON: Author.
18.
Guide. (1993). Guide for the Uniform Data set for medical rehabilitation (Adult FIM). Version 400. Buffalo, New York: State University of New York at Buffalo.
19.
HammelK.CarpenterC.DyckI. (1999). Using qualitative research: A practical introduction for occupational therapists and physical therapists. London: Churchill Livingstone.
20.
HornerS. (1998). Change health-care - a British point of view. In KilnerJ., OrrR. amd ShellyJ. (Eds). The Changing Face of Health Care. (pp. 280–298) Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdsman Publishing.
21.
HowardB.S. (1991). How high do we jump? The effect of reimbursement on occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 875–881.
22.
JongbloedL.CrichtonA. (1990). A new definition of disability: Implications for rehabilitation practice and social policy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 32–32
23.
JongbloedL (1998). Inequities in disability income system. National, 15 (4), 7.
24.
KielhofnerG. (1995). A model of human occupation: Theory and application. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
25.
KullaJ.MuillenburgM. (1999). The PPS principle. Advance, for directors of rehabilitation. April, 49–52.
26.
LandryC.KnoxJ. (1996). Managed care fundamentals: Implications for health care organizations and health care professionals. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 413–416.
27.
LawM.BaumC. (1998). Evidence-based occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 131–135.
28.
LawM.PolatajkoH.CarswellA.BaptisteS.McCollM. (1994). The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: Results of pilot testing. Canadian Journal of Occupationl Therapy, 61, 191–197.
29.
LipsetS. (1987). Continental divide: The values and institutions of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Canadian-American Committee.
30.
LomasJ.BarerM. (1986). And who shall represent the public interest? The legacy of Canadian health manpower policy. In EvansR.G. & StoddartG. (Eds.) Medicare at maturity: Achievements, lessons and challenges (pp. 91–121). Calgary, AB: The University of Calgary Press.
31.
MaioniA. (1995). The right kind of failure: Postwar national health insurance initiative in Canada and United States. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 20, 1–9.
32.
MathiowetzV. (1992). Role of physical performance component evaluations in occupational therapy functional assessment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 225–229.
33.
Negotiation results in lifting the $1500 Medicare therapy caps. (1999, November). ADVANCE for Physical Therapists and PT Assistants, 109–111.
34.
PackerT. (1998, June). Analyzing and defining function: Unraveling the confusion. Paper presented at the World Federation of Occupational Therapists conference, Montreal, Quebec.
35.
RoyeenC.B.DuncanM.CrabtreeJ.RichardsJ.ClarkG.F. (2000). Effects of billing Medicaid for occupational therapy services in the schools: A pilot study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 429–433.
36.
RiouxM.MuszynskiL. (1992). Comprehensive disability income security reform. Downsview, ON: Roeher Institute.
37.
StruthersM.S.SchellB.B. (1991). Public policy and its influence on performance. In ChristiansenC. & BaumC. (Eds.) Occupational therapy: Overcoming human performance deficits (pp. 178–196). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
38.
ThorpeK. (1997). The health care system in transition: Care, cost and coverage. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 22, 339–361.
39.
ThomesonM. (1996) The resource utilization groups' system of nursing home reimbursement policies: influences on occupational therapy practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 790–796.
40.
UliR.M.WoodR. (1995). The effects of third-party payer on the clinical decision-making of physical therapists. Social Science and Medicine, 40, 873–879.
41.
Van LeitB. (1995). Managed mental health care: Reflections in a time of turmoil. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 428–434.
42.
von ZweckC. (1999). The promotion of evidence-based occupational therapy practice in Canada. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 129–138.
43.
WalkerK. (2000). Adjustments to managed health care: pushing against it, going with it and making the best of it. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 129–138.
44.
WoodsonA. (1995). Stroke. In TromblyC. (Ed.) Occupational Therapy in Physical Dysfunction (pp. 677–704). Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins.
