The first year of a twin study undertaken between two occupational therapy programs in Canada and New Zealand is described. The primary aims of the study were to illuminate the lived experiences of students as they learn about cultural difference and had contact with clients of differing cultural backgrounds to themselves during fieldwork placements. While there are similarities between educational programs and the demographic profiles of the two cohorts of students, there are curricular differences primarily based on the described socio-political content of the two countries; Aotearoa/New Zealand as a bicultural society and Canada as multicultural. The paper discusses how these cultural differences interweave with other aspects of the students' educational program, as perceived and experienced by the students. Narrative data was thematically analyzed to reflect the experiences and the attendant thoughts and feelings of the participants.
CapleF. S.SalcidoR. M.diCeccoJ. (1995). Engaging effectively with cultural diverse families and children. Social Work in Education, 17, 159–170.
3.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.). (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 1–17). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
4.
DillardM.AndonianL.FloresO.LaiL.MacRaeA.ShakirM. (1992). Culturally competent occupational therapy in a diversely populated mental health setting. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 721–725.
5.
DurieM. (1994). Whaiora: Maori health development. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
6.
DyckI.ForwellS. (1997). Occupational therapy students' first year fieldwork experiences: Discovering the complexity of culture. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 185–196.
7.
DyckI.KearnsR. (1995). Transforming the relations of research: Towards culturally safe geographies of health & healing. Health and Place, 1, 137–147.
8.
FitzgeraldM. H.Mullavey-O'ByrneC. (1996). Analysis of student definitions of culture. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 14 (1), 67–89.
9.
FontanaA.FreyJ. H. (1994). Interviewing: The art of science. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 361–376). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
10.
ForwellS. (2000). Exploring how rehabilitation students acquire cultural competency: Methodological and ethical considerations. In HammellK.CarpenterC.DyckI (Eds.). Using Qualitative Research-A Practical Introduction for Occupational and Physical Therapists. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
11.
HammersleyM.AtkinsonP. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice. (2nd ed.). London: Tavistock.
12.
HolsteinJ.A.GubriumJ.F. (1994). Phenomenology, ethnomethodology, & interpretive practice. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 262–273). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
13.
IfillD. (1989). Teaching minority practice for professional application. Journal of Social Work Education, 1, 29–35.
14.
JungersenK. (1992). Culture, theory & the practice of occupational therapy in New Zealand/Aotearoa. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 745–750.
15.
KawharuI. (1989). Waitangi. Maori & Pakeha perspectives of the Treaty of Waitangi. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
16.
Kyler-HutchisonP. (1993). Issues in minority affairs: Communicating with minority fieldwork students. OT Week, March25, 6–7.
17.
MacDonaldR.RoweN. (1995). Minority ethic groups & occupational therapy, part 2: Transcultural occupational therapy, a curriculum for today's therapist. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 286–290.
18.
ManoleasP. (1994). An outcome approach to assessing the cultural competence of MSW students. In KeysP. R. (Ed.), School Social Workers in the Multicultural Environment: New Roles, Responsibilities & Educational Enrichment (pp. 29–42). New York: Haworth Press.
19.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation & research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Pope-DavisD. B.PrietoL. R.WhitakerC. M.Pope-DavisS. A. (1993). Exploring multicultural competencies of occupational therapists: Implications for education and training. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 838–844.
21.
Rehabilitation Subcommittee. (1991, June). Report of the Rehabilitation Subcommittee National Consultation on Multiculturalism & Training Health Professionals. Workshop funded by Secretary of State & Health & Welfare Canada.
22.
RonnauJ. P. (1994). Teaching cultural competence: Practical ideas for social work educators. In KeysP.R. (Ed.), School Social Workers in the Multicultural Environment: New Roles, Responsibilities & Educational Enrichment (pp. 29–42). New York: Haworth Press.
23.
ScottR. (1997). Investigation of cross-cultural practice: Implications for curriculum development. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 89–96.
24.
ScottR. E. (1994, June). Cultural issues in occupational therapy education. Paper presented at the CAN-AM Occupational Therapy Conference. Boston, MA.
25.
TorresJ.B.JonesJ.M. (1997). You've got to be taught: Multicultural education for social workers. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 15, (1/2), 161–179.
26.
University of British Columbia OT Curriculum. (1997). Available from the Division of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of British Columbia. Vancouver, Canada.
27.
Van ManenM. (1996). Researching lived experience. Albany, New York: Suny.
