The results of a study conducted in 1996 by the “Groupe de recherche en ergothérapie communautaire” (GREC), indicate that the quality of occupational therapy services in community settings is infrequently evaluated. A conceptual framework supporting such a process is presented in the context of client-centered services with a focus on continuous health care improvement. Both the research process leading to the design of an assessment tool, and its congruence with the beliefs and values of the profession, are explored. Finally, some issues relating to the implementation of a formal evaluation process are discussed.
AtchinsonB. (1997). Occupational therapy in home health: Rapid changes need proactive planning. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 406–409.
2.
BerwickD.M. (1989). Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. The New England Journal of Medicine, 320 (1), 53–56.
3.
BrockaBBrockaS.M. (1992). Primary elements of quality management: In Quality management: implementing the best ideas of the masters (pp. 22–46). Chicago, IL: Business One Irwin.
4.
CalsaferriK. (1993). Partnerships: A strategy for managing change in the 90's. National, 10 (3), 3–4.
5.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1997). Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
6.
ChristiansenC.ClarkR.KielhofnerG.RogersJ. (1995). Position paper: Occupation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 1015–1018.
7.
ClemenhagenC.ChampagneF. (1986). Quality Assurance as part of program evaluation: Guidelines for managers and clinical department heads. Quality Review Bulletin, 12, 383–387.
8.
ContandriopoulosA.P.ChampagneF.DenisJ.-L.PineaultR. (1992). L'Évaluation dans le domaine de la santé: Concepts et méthodes. Actes du Colloque l'évaluation en matière de santé: des concepts à la pratique, CREGE, 14–32.
9.
CrockerL.AlginaJ. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanish College Publishers.
10.
DavisG.L.BordieriJ.E. (1988). Perceived autonomy and job satisfaction in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 591–595.
11.
DonabedianA. (1988). The quality of care: How can it be assessed?Journal of the American Medical Association, 260, 1743–1748.
12.
EnglehardtH.T. (1977). Defining occupational therapy: The meaning of therapy and the virtues of occupation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 31, 666–672.
13.
EppJ. (1986). Achieving health for all: A framework for health promotion. Ottawa, ON: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
14.
FinlaysonM.EdwardsJ. (1995). Integrating the concepts of health promotion and community into occupational therapy practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 70–75.
15.
Forum National sur la santé. (1997). La santé au Canada: un héritage à faire fructifier, (Vol. 1). Ottawa, ON: Gouvernement du Canada.
16.
GrunchyC.RogersL. (1990). Quality assurance: The current challenge. Canadian Journal of Occupational therapy, 57, 109–115.
17.
HébertM.ThibeaultR.LandryA. M.BoisvenuM. (1997). Évaluation de la qualité des services ergothérapiques communautaires: Résultats d'une enquête. Revue Québécoise d'Ergothérapie, 6, 57–61.
18.
KhanJ. (1987). Gestion de la qualité dans les établissements de santé. Montréal, Qc: Édition Agence d'Arc.
19.
MarshallJ. S. (1992). Role of continuous quality improvement. Health Care: Innovation, Impact and Challenge. Kingston, ON: Queen's University.
20.
McCollM.QuinnB. (1985). A quality assurance method for community occupational therapists. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, 570–577.
21.
MoseyA.C. (1986). Psychosocial components of occupational therapy. New York: Raven.
22.
NelsonD.L. (1995). Therapeutic occupation: A definition. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 775–782.
23.
Ordre des ergothérapeutes du Québec. (1997). Les pratiques professionelles en ergothérapie: changements observés liés au virage ambulatoire. Montréal, QC: Author.
24.
OstrowC. (1983). The historical precedents for quality assurance in health care. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 37, 23–26.
25.
PineaultR. (1992). The reform of the Quebec health-care system: Potential for innovation? In Health Care: Innovation, Impact and Challenge. Kingston, ON: Queen's University.
26.
RenaudM. (1994). The future: Hygeia versus Panakeia? In EvansR.G.BarerM.L.MarmorT.R. (Eds.). Why are some people healthy and others not? The determinants of health of populations (pp. 317–334). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
27.
SavardJ. (1994). Appréciation de la qualité: Recension des expériences et des outils rapportés en ergothérapie. Revue Québécoise d'Ergothérapie, 3, 54–59.
28.
ShortellS.M.RichardsonW.C. (1978). Health program evaluation. St-Louis, MO: Mosby.
29.
TairaE.D. (1985). After treatment what? New roles for occupational therapists in the community. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 2 (1), 13–24.
30.
TownsendE. (1988). Developing community occupational therapy services in Canada. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 69–74.
31.
TremblayL. (1995). L'ergothérapie dans les CLSC: état de la situation. Revue Québécoise d'Ergothérapie, 4, 98–103.
32.
TrickeyF. (1993). Regard sur la pratique en milieu communautaire et sur l'approche particulière en santé communautaire. Revue Québécoise d'Ergothérapie, 2, 86–90.
