Development of the Handicap Assessment and Resource Tool (HART)

Abstract

French

An important determinant of whether people can live in community settings is the absence of significant handicap. People with considerable disabilities can live without handicap if they have adequate supports. Handicap, rather than disability, limits peoples' residence options. Disability assessment tools are commonly used to guide where people can live - these assess neither the resources available nor the personal-care handicap present. The Handicap Assessment and Resource Tool (HART) was designed to provide information about the personal-care issues (clothing, hygiene, nutrition, mobility, safety, residence and supports) relevant to choice of residence.

The HART was tested by occupational therapists who are frequently expected to provide recommendations regarding disabled clients' residence options. It is a client-centred tool that addresses key occupational performance components of personal care. Pilot testing in hospital and community settings shows the HART is a comprehensive and practical tool that is acceptable to users and clients.

Keywords

Activities of daily living evaluation Discharge planning Occupational performance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Desrosiers

Bravo

Hébert

Dubuc

(1995). Reliability of the revised Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF) for Epidemiological Research. Age and Ageing, 24, 402–406.

Fuhrer

M.J.

(1987). Rehabilitation outcomes: Analysis and measurement. Baltimore MD: Paul H. Brookes.

Fillenbaum

G.G.

Smyer

M.A.

(1981). The development, validity and reliability of the OARS multidimensional functional assessment questionnaire. Journal of Gerontology 73, 401–404.

Herbert

Carrier

Bilodeau

(1988). The Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF): Description and validation of an instrument for the measurement of handicaps. Age and Ageing, 17, 293–302.

Katz

Ford

A.B.

Moskowitz

R.W.

Jackson

B.A.

Jaffe

M.W.

(1963). Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. Journal of the American Medical Association, 185, 914–919.

Lawton

M.P.

Brody

E.M.

(1969) Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 9, 179–186.

Mahoney

F.I.

Barthel

D.W.

(1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61–65.

Townsend

(1988). Developing community occupational therapy services in Canada. The Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 69–74.

Trombly

C.A.

(1995) Theoretical foundations for practice. In Trombly

C.A.

, (Ed.), Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction, (4th ed.) pp 15–27. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.

10.

White

R.W.

(1959) Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Reviews, 66, 297–333.

11.

Whiteneck

G.G.

Charlifue

M.A.

Gerhart

K.A.

Overholser

J.D.

Richardson

G.N.

(1992). Quantifying handicap: A new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73, 519–26.

12.

Williams

J.H.

Drinks

T.J.K.

Greenberg

J.R.

Farrell-Holten

Euhardy

Schram

(1991). Development and testing of the Assessment of Living Skills and Resources (ALSAR) in elderly community-dwelling veterans. The Gerontologist, 31, 84–91.

13.

World Health Organization. (1980). International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps: A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva: Author.