Validity and Community Utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure

Abstract

French

This study addressed the validity and community utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) (Law et al., 1991; 1994; 1998): a measure that now represents a national standard in clinical practice and research in occupational therapy in Canada. The study employed a crosssectional design. Participants for the study were former consumers of occupational therapy services, recruited from the Queen's University catchment area (Kingston, North Bay, Oshawa, Perth, Peterborough). A sample of 61 disabled individuals living in the community were recruited. Each individual was sent a package of self-administered measures including the Satisfaction with Performance Scaled Questionnaire, the Reintegration to Normal Living Index, the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire, and the Perceived Problems List. An interview was also arranged with the project coordinator, which was based on the COPM and the Consumer Utility Questionnaire. Multivariate analyses showed that construct validity was supported; scores on the COPM were significantly related to theoretically related constructs: satisfaction with performance, reintegration to normal living and life satisfaction. In addition, criterion validity was supported. A majority of participants (53%), when asked about problems of daily living, spontaneously reported at least one of the problems raised on the COPM. Community utility was evaluated highly by participants, 75% of whom found the COPM useful in identifying and rating their problems, and 100% of whom reported no problems in understanding the COPM.

Keywords

Community occupational therapy Tests by title:Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Validity of tests

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baptiste

Law

Pollock

Polatajko

McColl

M.A.

Carswell

(1993). The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. World Federation of Occupational Therapy Bulletin, 28, 4751.

Bosch

(1995). The reliability and validity of the COPM. Unpublished Master's thesis. McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.

Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1991). Guidelines for client-centred practice of occupational therapy. Toronto, ON: CAOT Publications.

Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1997). Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications.

Chan

C.H.

Lee

T.M.C.

(1997) Validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Occupational Therapy International, 4, 229–47.

Garner

Casavant

Campbell

Hannah

(1997). Utility of the COPM. Unpublished undergraduate honours thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.

Hammond

(1996). Functional and health assessments used in rheumatology occupational therapy: A review and United Kingdom survey. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 254–9.

Keith

R.A.

Granger

C.V.

Hamilton

B.B.

Sherwin

F.S.

(1987). The Functional Independence Measure: A new tool for rehabilitation. Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation, 1, 68.

Law

Baptiste

Carswell-Opzoomer

McColl

M.A.

Polatajko

Pollock

(1991). Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Toronto, ON: CAOT Publications.

10.

Law

Baptiste

Carswell

McColl

M.A.

Polatajko

Pollock

(1994). The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON: CAOT Publications.

11.

Law

Baptiste

Carswell

McColl

M.A.

Polatajko

Pollock

(1998). The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (3rd ed.). Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications.

12.

Law

Baptiste

McColl

M.A.

Opzoomer

Polatajko

Pollock

(1990). The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: An outcome measurement protocol for occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 8287.

13.

Law

Polatajko

Pollock

McColl

M.A.

Carswell

Baptiste

(1994). The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: Results of pilot testing. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 6, 191–197.

14.

Law

Stewart

(1996). Test retest reliability of the COPM with children. Unpublished manuscript, McMaster University, School of Rehabilitation Science.

15.

Mahurin

R.K.

Bettignies

B.H.

Pirozzolo

F. J.

(1991). Structured Assessment of Independent Living Skills: Preliminary report of a performance measure of functional abilities in dementia. Journal of Gerontolology, 46, 5866.

16.

McColl

M.A.

Law

M.C.

Stewart

(1993). The theoretical basis of occupational therapy: An annotated bibliography of applied theory in the professional literature. Thorofare NJ: Slack.

17.

Mew

M.M.

Fossey

(1996). Client-centred aspects of clinical reasoning during an initial asessment using the COPM. Australian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43, 155–166.

18.

Meyer

(1977). The philosophy of occupational therapy. Archives of Occupational Therapy, 31, 639–642.

19.

Michalos

(1980). Satisfaction and happiness. Social Indicators Research, 8, 385–422.

20.

Packer

T.L.

Xiaoping

(1997). Needs of people with disabilities used to determine clinical eduation. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 20, 303–313.

21.

Sanford

Law

Swanson

Guyatt

(1994). Assessing clinically important change as an outcome of rehabilitation in older adults. Proceedings of the American Society of Aging. San Francisco, CA.

22.

Slagle

E. C.

(1934). Occupational therapy: Recent methods and advances in the United States. Occupational Therapy and Rehabilitation, 13, 289–298.

23.

Steeden

(1994) Occupational therapy guidelines for client-centred practice and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure [Book Review]. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 23.

24.

Toomey

Nicholson

Carswell

(1995). The clinical utility of the COPM: A study of community based occupational therapists. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 242–9.

25.

Trombly

(1993). Anticipating the future: Assessment of occupational dysfunction. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 253–7.

26.

Trombly

Radomski

M.V.

Davies

E.S.

(1998). Achievement of self-identified goals by adults with traumatic brain injury: Phase I. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 810–818.

27.

Ware

J.E.

Sherbourne

C.D.

(1992). The MOS 36-item shortform health survey (SF36): Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30 47383.

28.

Waters

(1995). Recovering from a depressive episode using the COPM. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 278–282.

29.

Wilcox

(1994). A study of verbal guidance for children with development coordination disorder. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.

30.

Wood-Dauphinee

Opzoomer

Williams

J.I.

Marchand

B.B.

Spitzer

W.O.

(1988). Assessment of global function: The Reintegration to Normal Living Index. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69, 583–590.

31.

World Health Organization. (1980). International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Geneva: Author.

32.

Yerxa

E.J.

Baum

(1986). Engagement in daily occupations and satisfaction among people with spinal cord injuries. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 6, 271–283.

33.

Yerxa

E.J.

Burnett-Beaulieu

Stocking

Azen

S.P.

(1988). Development of the Satisfaction with Performance Scaled Questionnaire (SPSQ). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 215–221.