See ArmstrongJ. G., “Social Irresponsibility in Management,”Journal of Business Research, Vol. 5 (1977), pp. 185–213; A. B. Carroll, “Managerial Ethics: A Post-Watergate View,” Business Horizons, Vol. 18 (1975), pp. 75–80; T. Krishnan, “Business Philosophy and Executive Responsibility,” Academy of Management Journal Vol. 16 (1973), pp. 658–669.
2.
BokD, “The President's Report 1977–78,”The Harvard University Gazette, Vol. LXXIV (April 27, 1979), p. 1.
3.
See ArlowP, UlrichT. A., “Business Ethics, Social Responsibility and Business Students: An Empirical Comparison of Clark's Study,”Akron Business and Economic Review, Vol. 11 (Fall 1980), pp. 17–22; D. DeSalvia and G. Gemmill, “An Exploratory Study of the Personal Value Systems of College Students and Managers,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 14 (1971), pp. 227–238; E. Schein, “Attitude of Change During Management Education,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 11 (1969), pp. 601–628; J. Siegel, “Machiavellianism, MBA's and Managers' Leadership Correlates and Socialization Effects,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 16 (1973), pp. 404–411.
4.
PetrofJ. V., SayeghE. E., VlahopoulosP. I., “The Influence of the School of Business on the Values of its Students,” paper presented at the Academy of Management, San Diego, August 1981.
5.
HollonC. J., UlrichT. A., “Personal Business Ethics: Managers vs. Managers-To-Be,”Southern Business Review, Vol. 5 (1979), pp. 17–22.
6.
See BuchholzR, Business Environment/Public Policy: A Study of Teaching and Research in Schools of Business and Management (St. Louis: Center for the Study of American Business,1979); T. F. McMahon, Report on the Teaching of Socio-Ethical Issues in Collegiate Schools of Business/Public Administration (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia, 1975).
7.
KohlbergGoslin L., “Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach to Socialization,” in GoslinD (Ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1969), pp. 347–480.
8.
Adapted from SizerL. Kohlberg, “Moral and Religious Education and the Public Schools: A Developmental View,” in SizerT. R. (Ed.), Religion and Public Education (New York: Houghton-Mifflin, 1967.
9.
RestJ, CooperD, CoderR, MasanzJ, AndersonD, “Judging the Important Issues in Moral Dilemmas —An Objective Measure of Development,”Developmental Psychology, Vol. 10 (1974), pp. 491–501.
10.
LawrenceJ. A., “Moral Judgment Intervention Studies Using the Defining Issues Test,”Development in Judging Moral Issues—A Summary of Research Using the Defining Issues Test, Minnesota Moral Research Projects, Technical Report #3, pp. 34–45.
11.
DavisonM. L., RobbinsS, “The Reliability and Validity of Objective Indices of Moral Development,” Unpublished paper, University of Minnesota, 1977.
12.
RestJ. R., “The Hierarchial Nature of Moral Judgment: A Study of Patterns of Comprehension and Preference of Moral Stages,”Journal of Personality, Vol. 41 (1973), pp. 86–109.
13.
McGeorgeC, “Susceptibility to Faking of the Defining Issues Test of Moral Development,”Developmental Psychology, Vol. 11 (1975), p. 108.
14.
ParkinF, Class Inequality and Political Order (New York: Praeger, 1971.
15.
FletcherJ, Moral Responsibility: Situation Ethics At Work (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1967), p. 168.
