Despite growing interest in identity within the management and organization studies, Indigenous identity in the Indian context remains underexplored. To address this gap, I examine the identity struggles of tea plantation laborers (Tea-Tribe laborers) in Assam, India. Specifically, I explore how the tea plantation laborers experience and navigate liminality between their institutionalized occupational identity as a laborer and under-institutionalized ethnic identity as an Adivasi. Drawing on qualitative interviews with 25 Tea-Tribe laborers and adopting a constructivist approach, I identify important distinctions in their identity work. For the institutionalized (laborer) identity, their identity work primarily takes the form of political advocacy. In contrast, for the under-institutionalized (Adivasi) identity, they engage in cultural assertion along with political advocacy. My study contributes to the positional liminality literature by showing how intersecting disadvantaged identities shape liminal experiences and how individuals navigate them through identity work.
AlkhaledS.SasakiI. (2022). Syrian women refugees: Coping with indeterminate liminality during forcible displacement. Organization Studies, 43(10), 1583–1605.
2.
AlvessonM.Lee AshcraftK.ThomasR. (2008). Identity matters: Reflections on the construction of identity scholarship in organization studies. Organization, 15(1), 5–28.
3.
AnanthanarayananS. (2010). Scheduled tribe status for Adivasis in Assam. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 33(2), 290–303.
4.
AshforthB. E.MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.
5.
BapujiH.ChrispalS.AttriP. S.ErtugG.SoundarajanV. (2024). An integrative review of management research on caste: Broadening our horizons. Academy of Management Annals, 18(2), 506–549.
6.
BapujiH.ChrispalS.VissaB.ErtugG. (2023). Local, yet global: Implications of caste for MNEs and international business. Journal of International Business Policy, 6(2), 201–234.
7.
BarhoiP.DayalS. (2024). Adivasi women temporary workers in tea gardens and the Covid-19 pandemic. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 43(2), 211–229.
8.
BarhoiP.PathakM.NambudiriR. (2025). Liminality of professional identity and caregiving identity among women professionals working in rural development nonprofits in India. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 54(4), 856–884.
9.
BaroN. S. (2021). Tea tribes in Assam in historical perspective with special reference to Udalguri district, Assam. Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology, 9, 1051–1060.
10.
BeechN. (2011). Liminality and the practices of identity reconstruction. Human Relations, 64(2), 285–302.
11.
BéteilleA. (1991). The reproduction of inequality: Occupation, caste and family. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 25(1), 3–28.
12.
BhasinM. K. (2006). Genetics of castes and tribes of India: Indian population milieu. International Journal of Human Genetics, 6(3), 233–274.
13.
BhowmikS. K. (2011). Ethnicity and isolation: Marginalization of tea plantation workers. Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts, 4(2), 235–253.
14.
BhowmikS. K. (2015). Living conditions of tea plantation workers. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(46/47), 29–32.
15.
BrownA. D. (2015). Identities and identity work in organizations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(1), 20–40.
16.
BrownA. D. (2022). Identities in and around organizations: Towards an identity work perspective. Human Relations, 75(7), 1205–1237.
17.
CazaB. B.VoughH.PuranikH. (2018). Identity work in organizations and occupations: Definitions, theories, and pathways forward. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(7), 889–910.
18.
ChattopadhyayR. (1988). Land grant as a method of labour control in Assam plantations in colonial times. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 49, 520–523.
19.
ChrispalS.BapujiH.ZietsmaC. (2021). Caste and organization studies: Our silence makes us complicit. Organization Studies, 42(9), 1501–1515.
20.
CorntasselJ. (2003). Who is indigenous? “Peoplehood” and ethnonationalist approaches to rearticulating indigenous identity. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 9(1), 75–100.
21.
DalyT.ArmstrongP. (2016). Liminal and invisible long-term care labour: Precarity in the face of austerity. Journal of Industrial Relations, 58, 473–490.
22.
DasD. (2022), Work life experience of Adivasi (indigenous) workers in Tea Plantation Industry on conflict-ridden areas in India: A qualitative study in Assam. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(2), e2446.
23.
DasN. K. (2016). Making of tea tribes in Assam: Colonial exploitation and assertion of Adivasi rights. Journal of Adivasi and Indigenous Studies, 3(1), 1–16.
24.
DasguptaS. (2018). Adivasi studies: From a historian’s perspective. History Compass, 16(10), e12486.
25.
DaskalakiM.ButlerC.PetrovicJ. (2016). Some-where in-between: narratives of place, identity, and translocal work. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25, 184–198.
26.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. London.
27.
DeshpandeA. (2011). The grammar of caste: Economic discrimination in contemporary India. Oxford University Press.
28.
DeshpandeA. (2015). Caste and diversity in India. In DavisJ. B.DolfsmaW. (Eds.), The Elgar companion to social economics (2nd ed., pp. 198–212). Edward Elgar Publishing.
29.
DeshpandeA. (2019). Double jeopardy? Stigma of identity and affirmative action. The Review of Black Political Economy, 46(1), 38–64.
30.
DoshiV. (2022). Experiencing liminality: At the crossroads of neoliberal and gendered experiences. Gender, Work & Organization, 29(4), 1132–1148.
31.
DuaraM.MallickS. (2012, November). Tea industry in Assam (India): Issues of migration and gender discrimination. In Proceedings of the International Conference on History and Society Development (ICHSD 2012) (pp. 174–177).
32.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.
33.
Government of India. (1981). Census of India 1981. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India.
34.
Government of India. (2011). Socio-Economic and Caste Census (SECC) 2011. Ministry of Rural Development.
35.
GrayB.JohnsonT.Kish-GephartJ.TiltonJ. (2018). Identity work by first-generation college students to counteract class-based microaggressions. Organization Studies, 39(9), 1227–1250.
36.
Howard-GrenvilleJ.Golden-BiddleK.IrwinJ.MaoJ. (2011). Liminality as cultural process for cultural change. Organization Science, 22(2), 522–539.
37.
IbarraH.ObodaruO. (2016). Betwixt and between identities: Liminal experience in contemporary careers. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 47–64.
38.
JamjoomL. A. (2022). Tread lightly: Liminality and Covid-19 reflections. Gender, Work & Organization, 29(4), 1314–1330.
39.
KalitaB. J.HandiqueR.BorgohainA. (2022). Sex, sahibs and bodies: women workers in the tea plantations of colonial Assam. Labor History, 63(3), 316–331.
40.
KalitaB. J.HandiqueR.BorgohainA. (2025). Who built the empire’s garden? Tea capitalism in Assam and the making of the tea community. Labor History. https://doi.org/10.1080/0023656X.2025.2467944
41.
KambleR. A.KumarR. (2025). Writing the Adivasis (indigenous) in MOS: A critique of colonial and postcolonial epistemology and reframing the multiple worlds of Adivasis. Organization. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084251386795
42.
MahadevanJ. (2015). Understanding the process of inter-cultural negotiations through liminality: Insights on biculturality, marginality and cultural expertise from a Sino-German business context. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 15, 239–258.
43.
MahalingamR.JagannathanS.SelvarajP. (2019). Decasticization, dignity, and “dirty work” at the intersections of caste, memory, and disaster. Business Ethics Quarterly, 29(2), 213–239.
44.
MarwahV. (2022). Liminality as wage penalty for India’s women community health workers. Gender, Work & Organization, 30(2), 412–430.
45.
McCarthyL.MuthuriJ. N. (2018). Engaging fringe stakeholders in business and society research: Applying visual participatory research methods. Business & Society, 57(1), 131–173.
46.
MishraD. K.SarmaA.UpadhyayV. (2011). Invisible chains? Crisis in the tea industry and the “unfreedom” of labour in Assam’s tea plantations. Contemporary South Asia, 19(1), 75–90.
47.
MisraU. (2007). Adivasi struggle in Assam. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(51), 11–14.
PlumpB.Geist-MartinP. (2013). Collaborative intersectionality: Negotiating identity, liminal spaces, and ethnographic research. Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies, 9(2), 59–72.
50.
PrasadA. (2022). Contested indigeneities: “Adivasi” politics historically and in contemporary times. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 11(1), 37–61.
51.
SalmonE.ChavezR.MurphyM. J. F. (2023). New perspectives and critical insights from Indigenous peoples’ research: A systematic review of Indigenous management and organization literature. Academy of Management Annals, 17(2), 439–491.
52.
SawyerS.GomezE. T. (2012). On indigenous identity and a language of rights. In The politics of resource extraction: Indigenous peoples, multinational corporations and the state (pp. 9-32). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
53.
SenS. (2002). Questions of consent: Women’s recruitment for Assam tea gardens, 1859–1900. Studies in History, 18(2), 231–260.
54.
SharmaD. P. (2015). Demand of “tea tribes” for scheduled tribe status in Assam: A review. In Troubled diversity: The political process in Northeast India (pp. 104–121). Oxford University Press.
55.
SharmaJ. (2009). “Lazy” natives, coolie labour, and the Assam tea industry. Modern Asian Studies, 43(6), 1287–1324.
56.
ShepherdD. A.MaitlisS.ParidaV.WincentJ.LawrenceT. B. (2022). Intersectionality in intractable dirty work: How Mumbai ragpickers make meaning of their work and lives. Academy of Management Journal, 65(5), 1680–1708.
57.
ShorttH. (2015). Liminality, space and the importance of “transitory dwelling places” at work. Human Relations, 68, 633–658.
58.
SöderlundJ.BorgE. (2018). Liminality in management and organization studies: Process, position and place. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(4), 880–902.
59.
TajfelH.TurnerJ.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
60.
ToubianaM.RuebottomT. (2022). Stigma hierarchies: The internal dynamics of stigmatization in the sex work occupation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 67(2), 515–552.
61.
ToyokiS.BrownA. D. (2014). Stigma, identity and power: Managing stigmatized identities through discourse. Human Relations, 67(6), 715–737.
62.
TraceyP.PhillipsN. (2016). Managing the consequences of organizational stigmatization: Identity work in a social enterprise. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 740–765.
63.
TripathiR. C. (2016). Violence and the other: Contestations in multicultural societies. In TripathiR. C.SinghP. (Eds.), Perspectives on violence and othering in India (pp. 3–28). Springer.
64.
TripathiR. C. (2019). Unity of the individual and the collective. Psychology, 2, 283–331.
65.
TurnerV. (1969). Liminality and communitas. In TurnerV. (Ed.), The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Aldine.
66.
Van GennepA. (1960). The rites of passage. University of Chicago Press.
67.
Van MaanenJ. E.ScheinE. H. (1977). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1, 209–264.
68.
WatsonT. J. (2008). Managing identity: Identity work, personal predicaments and structural circumstances. Organization, 15(1), 121–143.
69.
WeaverH. N. (2001). Indigenous identity: What is it, and who really has it?. American Indian Quarterly, 25(2), 240–255.
70.
WinklerI. (2018). Identity work and emotions: A review. International journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 120–133.
71.
WinklerI.MahmoodM. K. (2015). The liminality of temporary agency work: Exploring the dimensions of Danish temporary agency workers’ liminal experience. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 5, 51–68.
72.
XaxaV. (1999). Tribes as indigenous people of India. Economic and Political Weekly, 34(51), 3589–3595.
73.
XaxaV. (2005). Politics of language, religion and identity: Tribes in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(13), 1363–1370.
74.
YbemaS.BeechN.EllisN. (2011). Transitional and perpetual liminality: An identity practice perspective. Anthropology Southern Africa, 34(1–2), 21–29.
75.
ZulfiqarG. M. (2019). Dirt, foreignness, and surveillance: The shifting relations of domestic work in Pakistan. Organization, 26(3), 321–333.
