AnisS.FrenchJ. A. (2023). Efficient, explicatory, and equitable: Why qualitative researchers should embrace AI, but cautiously. Business & Society, 62(6), 1139–1144. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503231163286
2.
BapujiH.HigginsC. (2023). Leadership for inclusion and impact: A renewed vision for business & society. Business & Society, 62(1), 3–8.
3.
BeugelsdijkS.BirdA. (2024). How to avoid a desk reject: Do’s and don’ts. Journal of International Business Studies, 56(3), 301–310.
4.
BoscoF. A.AguinisH.FieldJ. G.PierceC. A.DaltonD. R. (2016). HARKing’s threat to organizational research: Evidence from primary and meta-analytic sources. Personnel Psychology, 69(3), 709–750. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12111
5.
CampbellJ. T.AguileraR. V. (2022). Why i rejected your paper: Common pitfalls in writing theory papers and how to avoid them. Academy of Management Review, 47(4), 521–527.
6.
CraneA.HenriquesI.HustedB.MattenD. (2015). Defining the scope of business & society. Business & Society, 54(4), 427–434.
7.
CraneA.HenriquesI.HustedB. W.MattenD. (2016). What constitutes a theoretical contribution in the business and society field?Business & Society, 55(6), 783–791.
8.
DorobantuS.GruberM.RavasiD.WellmanN. (2024). The AMJ management research canvas: A tool for conducting and reporting empirical research. Academy of Management Journal, 67(5), 1163–1174.
9.
GalvinP. (2014). The view from the ‘other side of the desk.’Journal of Management & Organization, 20(6), 711–714.
10.
GarandJ. C.HarmanM. (2021). Journal desk-rejection practices in political science: Bringing data to bear on what journals do. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(4), 676–681.
11.
GeorgeG. (2012). From the editors: Publishing in “AMJ” for non-U.S. authors. The Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1023–1026.
12.
GibsonJ. L. (2021). Against desk rejects!PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(4), 673–675.
13.
HassellH. J. G. (2021). Desk rejects widen inequalities within academia. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(4), 699–702.
14.
HitchcockC.SoberE. (2004). Prediction versus accommodation and the risk of overfitting. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55(1), 1–34.
15.
Howard-GrenvilleJ.NelsonA.VoughH.ZilberT. B. (2021). From the editors—Achieving fit and avoiding misfit in qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 64(5), 1313–1323.
