This commentary presents an epistemological perspective on grand challenges (GCs) suggesting that the distinction between Umwelt (what social systems observe) and environment (the surrounding but unobserved world) can help us provide deeper analyses of GCs. I argue that indifference to the environment outside the observed Umwelt is a root cause of GCs and suggest that organizations must compensate for society’s inability to address GCs by developing forms of intelligent self-limitation.
BrandU.MuracaB.PineaultÉ.SahakianM.SchaffartzikA.NovyA.StreisslerC.HaberH.AsaraV.DietzK.LangM.KothariA.SmithT.SpashC.BradA.PichlerM.PlankC.VelegrakisG.JahnT., . . . & GörgC. (2021). From planetary to societal boundaries: An argument for collectively defined self-limitation. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 17(1), 264–291.
2.
GrayB.PurdyJ.AnsariS. (2022). Confronting power asymmetries in partnerships to address grand challenges. Organization Theory, 3(2), 26317877221098765.
3.
SchneiderA. (2024). Untaming grand challenges research: Against a de-politicization of grand challenges. Business & Society, 63(6), 1302–1306.
4.
SeidlD. (2007). The dark side of knowledge. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 9(3), 16–29.
5.
Von UexküllJ. (1992). A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds. International Universities Press.
