Recent regulatory interventions are beginning to mandate climate disclosure in listed firms. Although compelling, prior studies demonstrate that firms can symbolically commit to climate and environmental disclosures yet not undertake action. Neo-institutional theory (NIT) suggests that two strategies exist: the legitimacy perspective, which manifests in symbolic efforts, and the efficiency perspective, which is more consistent with substantive efforts. In this article, we apply NIT to assess the climate transition efforts in large, publicly traded firms in five countries with similar regulatory and economic profiles (Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States). We gauge climate efforts by membership in corporate climate initiatives (CCIs) and the integration of climate action plans (CAPs). Of the eight CCIs and three CAPs investigated, we find that only two CCIs and one CAP help to improve emissions performance. The majority of firms in our sample, therefore, demonstrate the legitimacy perspective of NIT.
AbbottW. F.MonsenR. J. (1979). On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-reported disclosures as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 22(3), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.5465/255740
2.
AguileraR. V.RuppD. E.WilliamsC. A.GanapathiJ. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.
3.
Aragón-CorreaJ. A. (1998). Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 556–567. https://doi.org/10.2307/256942
4.
AshforthB. E.GibbsB. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194.
5.
BackmanC. A.VerbekeA.SchulzR. A. (2017). The drivers of corporate climate change strategies and public policy: A new resource-based view perspective. Business & Society, 56(4), 545–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315578450
6.
BäckstrandK. (2008). Accountability of networked climate governance: The rise of transnational climate partnerships. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 74–102. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.74
7.
BattistonS.MandelA.MonasteroloI.SchützeF.VisentinG. (2017). A Climate stress-test of the financial system. Nature Climate Change, 7(4), 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3255
8.
BattistonS.MonasteroloI. (2019). A climate risk assessment of sovereign bonds’ portfolio. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1, 1–33. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3376218
9.
BerlinerD.PrakashA. (2015). “Bluewashing” the firm? Voluntary regulations, program design, and member compliance with the United Nations global compact. Policy Studies Journal, 43(1), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12085
10.
BernsteinS.HoffmannM. (2018). The politics of decarbonization and the catalytic impact of subnational climate experiments. Policy Sciences, 51(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9314-8
11.
BielenbergA.KerlinM.OppenheimJ.RobertsM. (2016). Financing change: How to mobilize private-sector financing for sustainable infrastructure. McKinsey Center for Business and Environment.
BryanK. (2022, November9). COP27: Mark Carney clings to his dream of a greener finance industry. Financial Times. https://on.ft.com/3UI3BT2
15.
BuschT.JohnsonM.PiochT. (2022). Corporate carbon performance data: Quo vadis?Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26, 350–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13008
16.
CalleryP. J. (2023). The influence of strategic disclosure on corporate climate performance ratings. Business & Society, 62(5), 950–988.
17.
CalleryP. J.PerkinsJ. (2020). Detecting false accounts in intermediated voluntary disclosure. Academy of Management Discoveries, 7(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2018.0229
18.
CampiglioE.GodinA.Kemp-BenedictE.MatikainenS. (2017). The tightening links between financial systems and the low-carbon transition. In ArestisP.SawyerM. (Eds.), Economic policies since the global financial crisis. International Papers in Political Economy (pp. 313–356). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60459-6_8
19.
ChithamboL.TingbaniI.AgyapongG. A.GyapongE.DamoahI. S. (2020). Corporate voluntary greenhouse gas reporting: Stakeholder pressure and the mediating role of the chief executive officer. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(4), 1666–1683. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2460
20.
CoenD.HermanK.PegramT. (2020). The private sector and climate change: A case study of carbon-based governance [Delivery for GLOBE-EU project]. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10140074
21.
CoenD.HermanK.PegramT. (2022). Are corporate climate efforts genuine? An empirical analysis of the climate “talk–walk” hypothesis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31, 3040–3059. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3063
22.
CoenD.HermanK. S.PegramT. (2023). Market masquerades? Corporate climate initiative effects on firm-level climate performance. Global Environmental Politics, 23, 141–169.
23.
DahlmannF.BranickiL.BrammerS. (2017). ‘Carrots for corporate sustainability’: Impacts of incentive inclusiveness and variety on environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(8), 1110–1131. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1971
24.
DamertM.PaulA.BaumgartnerR. J. (2017). Exploring the determinants and long-term performance outcomes of corporate carbon strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 160, 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.206
25.
DawkinsC.FraasJ. W. (2011). Coming clean: The impact of environmental performance and visibility on corporate climate change disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(2), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0681-0
26.
DelmasM. A.Montes-SanchoM. J. (2010). Voluntary agreements to improve environmental quality: Symbolic and substantive cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(6), 575–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.826
27.
DelmasM. A.ToffelM. W. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.409
28.
DietzS.ByrneR.GardinerD.GostlowG.JahnV.NachmanyM.SullivanR. (2020). TPI state of transition report 2020. Transition Pathway Initiatives.
29.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
30.
DingwerthK.EichingerM. (2010). Tamed transparency: How information disclosure under the global reporting initiative fails to empower. Global Environmental Politics, 10(3), 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00015
31.
DioufD.BoiralO. (2017). The quality of sustainability reports and impression management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(3), 643–667. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2015-2044
32.
DodaB.GennaioliC.GouldsonA.GroverD.SullivanR. (2016). Are corporate carbon management practices reducing corporate carbon emissions?Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(5), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1369
33.
DoranK. L.QuinnE. L. (2008). Climate change risk disclosure: A sector by sector analysis of SEC 10-K filings from 1995-2008. North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, 34, 721.
34.
DownieJ.StubbsW. (2012). Corporate carbon strategies and greenhouse gas emission assessments: The implications of scope 3 emission factor selection. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(6), 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1734
35.
GergedA. M.MatthewsL.ElheddadM. (2021). Mandatory disclosure, greenhouse gas emissions and the cost of equity capital: UK evidence of a U-shaped relationship. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 908–930. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2661
36.
GiannarakisG.ZafeiriouE.SariannidisN. (2017). The impact of carbon performance on climate change disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(8), 1078–1094. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1962
37.
Government Canada. (2022). A plan to grow our economy and make life more affordable.
38.
GreenJ. F. (2013). Order out of chaos: Public and private rules for managing carbon. Global Environmental Politics, 13(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00164
39.
GreenJ. F.AuldG. (2017). Unbundling the regime complex: The effects of private authority. Transnational Environmental Law, 6(2), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102516000121
40.
GreenJ. F.HaddenJ.HaleT.MahdaviP. (2022). Transition, hedge, or resist? Understanding political and economic behavior toward decarbonization in the oil and gas industry. Review of International Political Economy, 29(6), 2036–2063.
41.
GuentherE.GuentherT.SchiemannF.WeberG. (2016). Stakeholder relevance for reporting: Explanatory factors of carbon disclosure. Business & Society, 55(3), 361–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315575119
42.
GuptaA.MasonM. (2016). Disclosing or obscuring? The politics of transparency in global climate governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 18, 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.11.004
43.
HahnR.ReimsbachD.SchiemannF. (2015). Organizations, climate change, and transparency: Reviewing the literature on carbon disclosure. Organization & Environment, 28(1), 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575542
44.
HalmeM.RintamäkiJ.KnudsenJ. S.LankoskiL.KuismaM. (2020). When is there a sustainability case for CSR? Pathways to environmental and social performance improvements. Business & Society, 59(6), 1181–1227.
45.
HaqueF. (2017). The effects of board characteristics and sustainable compensation policy on carbon performance of UK firms. The British Accounting Review, 49(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.01.001
46.
HaqueF.NtimC. G. (2018). Environmental policy, sustainable development, governance mechanisms and environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(3), 415–435. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2007
47.
HaqueF.NtimC. G. (2020). Executive compensation, sustainable compensation policy, carbon performance and market value. British Journal of Management, 31(3), 525–546.
48.
HaqueF.NtimC. G. (2022). Do corporate sustainability initiatives improve corporate carbon performance? Evidence from European firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3318–3334.
49.
HassanO. A. G.RomillyP.KhadarooI. (2024). The impact of corporate environmental management practices on environmental performance. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 33, 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12618
50.
HeckmanJ. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352
51.
HermanK. S.ShenkJ. (2021). Pattern discovery for climate and environmental policy indicators. Environmental Science & Policy, 120, 89–98.
52.
HoffmanA. J. (2005). Climate change strategy: The business logic behind voluntary greenhouse gas reductions. California Management Review, 47(3), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166305
53.
HsuA.HöhneN.KuramochiT.RoelfsemaM.WeinfurterA.XieY.. . .WiderbergO. (2019). A research roadmap for quantifying non-state and subnational climate mitigation action. Nature Climate Change, 9(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0338-z
54.
HsuehL. (2017). Transnational climate governance and the global 500: Examining private actor participation by firm-level factors and dynamics. International Interactions, 43(1), 48–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2016.1223929
55.
HsuehL. (2019). Opening up the firm: What explains participation and effort in voluntary carbon disclosure by global businesses? An analysis of internal firm factors and dynamics. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(7), 1302–1322. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2317
56.
HsuehL. (2022). Do businesses that disclose climate change information emit less carbon? Evidence from S&P 500 firms. Climate Change Economics, 13(2), 1–43.
57.
HummelK.SchlickC.FifkaM. (2019). The role of sustainability performance and accounting assurors in sustainability assurance engagements. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(3), 733–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3410-5
InS. Y.SchumacherK. (2021). Carbonwashing: ESG data greenwashing in a post-Paris world. In Settling climate accounts (pp. 39–58). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83650-4_3
International Panel on Climate Change. (2023). AR6 synthesis report: Climate change 2023 (No. AR6). United Nations. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/
62.
JensenM. C.MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
63.
KabirM. N.RahmanS.RahmanM. A.AnwarM. (2021). Carbon emissions and default risk: International evidence from firm-level data. Economic Modelling, 103, 105617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105617
64.
KimE.-H.LyonT. P. (2011). Strategic environmental disclosure: Evidence from the DOE’s voluntary greenhouse gas registry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61(3), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2010.11.001
65.
KimE. H.LyonT. P. (2015). Greenwash vs. brownwash: Exaggeration and undue modesty in corporate sustainability disclosure. Organization Science, 26(3), 705–723.
66.
Knox-HayesJ.LevyD. (2014). The political economy of governance by disclosure: Carbon disclosure and nonfinancial reporting as contested fields of governance. In Transparency and global environmental governance: Critical perspectives (pp. 205–224). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262027410.003.0009
67.
KolkA.LevyD.PinkseJ. (2008). Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime: The institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure. European Accounting Review, 17(4), 719–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180802489121
68.
KuoL.ChangB. G. (2021). Ambitious corporate climate action: Impacts of science—based target and internal carbon pricing on carbon management reputation—Evidence from Japan. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1830–1840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.025
69.
KuramochiT.RoelfsemaM.HsuA.LuiS.WeinfurterA.ChanS.. . .HöhneN. (2020). Beyond national climate action: The impact of region, city, and business commitments on global greenhouse gas emissions. Climate Policy, 20(3), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1740150
70.
KuyperJ. W.LinnérB. O.SchroederH. (2018). Non-state actors in hybrid global climate governance: Justice, legitimacy, and effectiveness in a post-Paris era. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9(1), e497. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.497
71.
LazarusR. J. (2008). Super wicked problems and climate change: Restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Review, 94, 1153.
72.
LemmaT. T.LulsegedA.TavakolifarM. (2021). Corporate commitment to climate change action, carbon risk exposure, and a firm’s debt financing policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30, 3919–3936. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2849
73.
LewandowskiS. (2017). Corporate carbon and financial performance: The role of emission reductions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(8), 1196–1211. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1978
74.
LombardiR.SchimpernaF.PaoloniP.GaleottiM. (2022). The climate-related information in the changing EU directive on non-financial reporting and disclosure: First evidence by Italian large companies. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(1), 250–273.
75.
LuiS.KuramochiT.SmitS.RoelfsemaM.HsuA.WeinfurterA.. . .HöhneN. (2021). Correcting course: The emission reduction potential of international cooperative initiatives. Climate Policy, 21(2), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1806021
LyonT. P.MaxwellJ. W. (2011). Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(1), 3–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00282.x
78.
LyonT. P.ShimshackJ. P. (2015). Environmental disclosure: Evidence from Newsweek’s green companies rankings. Business & Society, 54, 632–675.
79.
MarimonF.del Mar Alonso-AlmeidaM.del Pilar RodríguezM.AlejandroK. A. C. (2012). The worldwide diffusion of the global reporting initiative: What is the point?Journal of Cleaner Production, 33, 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.017
80.
MatisoffD. C. (2012). Privatizing climate change policy: Is there a public benefit?Environmental and Resource Economics, 53(3), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9568-0
81.
MatisoffD. C. (2013). Different rays of sunlight: Understanding information disclosure and carbon transparency. Energy Policy, 55, 579–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.049
82.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
83.
MizruchiM. S.FeinL. C. (1999). The social construction of organizational knowledge: A study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 653–683.
84.
NewellP.PatersonM. (2010). Climate capitalism: Global warming and the transformation of the global economy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94018-2_2
85.
NtimC. G.LindopS.ThomasD. A. (2013). Corporate governance and risk reporting in South Africa: A study of corporate risk disclosures in the pre-and post-2007/2008 global financial crisis periods. International Review of Financial Analysis, 30, 363–383.
PattbergP. (2017). The emergence of carbon disclosure: Exploring the role of governance entrepreneurs. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(8), 1437–1455. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417723341
90.
PflukeC. (2019). A history of the five eyes alliance: Possibility for reform and additions: A history of the five eyes alliance: Possibility for reform and additions. Comparative Strategy, 38(4), 302–315.
PopeS.KimJ. (2022). Where, when, and who: Corporate social responsibility and brand value—A global panel study. Business & Society, 61(6), 1631–1683.
93.
QianW.SchalteggerS. (2017). Revisiting carbon disclosure and performance: Legitimacy and management views. The British Accounting Review, 49(4), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.05.005
94.
QiuY.ShaukatA.TharyanR. (2016). Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. The British Accounting Review, 48(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.007
95.
RaduC.CaronM. A.ArroyoP. (2020). Integration of carbon and environmental strategies within corporate disclosures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118681
96.
RamusC.MontielI. (2005). When are corporate environmental policies a form of greenwashing?Business & Society, 44(4), 377–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305278120
97.
RoelfsemaM.HarmsenM.OlivierJ. J.HofA. F.van VuurenD. P. (2018). Integrated assessment of international climate mitigation commitments outside the UNFCCC. Global Environmental Change, 48, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.001
98.
SchneiderA.SchererA. G. (2019). State governance beyond the ‘shadow of hierarchy’: A social mechanisms perspective on governmental CSR policies. Organisation Studies, 40(8), 1147–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619835584
99.
SemykinaA.WooldridgeJ. M. (2010). Estimating panel data models in the presence of endogeneity and selection. Journal of Econometrics, 157(2), 375–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.03.039
100.
SlawinskiN.PinkseJ.BuschT.BanerjeeS. B. (2017). The role of short-termism and uncertainty avoidance in organisational inaction on climate change: A multi-level framework. Business & Society, 56(2), 253–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315576136
101.
StreeckW. (2011). Taking capitalism seriously: Towards an institutionalist approach to contemporary political economy. Socio-Economic Review, 9(1), 137–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwq028
102.
TalbotD.BoiralO. (2015). Strategies for climate change and impression management: A case study among Canada’s large industrial emitters. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2322-5
TrinksA.MulderM.ScholtensB. (2017). Greenhouse gas emissions intensity and the cost of capital. Research Report 17017-EEF, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
105.
TrumppC.GuentherT. (2017). Too little or too much? Exploring U-shaped relationships between corporate environmental performance and corporate financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1900
UnruhG.KironD.KruschwitzN.ReevesM.RubelH.Zum FeldeA. M. (2016). Investing for a sustainable future: Investors care more about sustainability than many executives believe. MIT Sloan Management Review, 57(4).
108.
VizcarraH. V. (2018). Climate-related disclosure and litigation risk in the oil & gas industry: Will state attorneys general investigations impede the drive for more expansive disclosures. Vermont Law Review, 43, 733.
109.
WalentaJ. (2018). The limits to private-sector climate change action: The geographies of corporate climate governance. Economic Geography, 94(5), 461–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.1474078
110.
WalkerK.WanF. (2012). The harm of symbolic actions and greenwashing: Corporate actions and communications on environmental performance and their financial implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1122-4
111.
WalshP. F. (2020). Improving “Five Eyes” health security intelligence capabilities: Leadership and governance challenges. Intelligence and National Security, 35(4), 586–602.
112.
WeinhoferG.HoffmannV. H. (2010). Mitigating climate change–how do corporate strategies differ?Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(2), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.618
113.
WickertC.SchererA. G.SpenceL. J. (2016). Walking and talking corporate social responsibility: Implications of firm size and organizational cost. Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1169–1196. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12209
114.
WiderbergO.PattbergP. (2015). International cooperative initiatives in global climate governance: Raising the ambition level or delegitimizing the UNFCCC?Global Policy, 6(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12184
115.
WooldridgeJ. M. (1995). Selection corrections for panel data models under conditional mean independence assumption. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01645-G
116.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.
WrightC.NybergD. (2015). Climate change, capitalism, and corporations. Cambridge University Press.
119.
WrightC.NybergD. (2017). An inconvenient truth: How organizations translate climate change into business as usual. Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), 1633–1661. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0718
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
