Shared Capitalism and Corporate Sustainability: Broad-Based Employee Share Ownership,CEO Ownership,and Corporate Environmental Performance

Abstract

This research proposes that broad-based employee share ownership (ESO) affects corporate environmental performance (CEP). Drawing upon corporate governance literature, social exchange theory, and stakeholder utility theory, we propose that employees as owners adopt more favorable attitudes toward beneficial outcomes for CEP, and that the broad-based impact of ESO overwhelms the impact of CEO ownership. Also, we propose that these relationships are contingent upon trade union presence as a form of worker voice that amplifies the ESO influence on CEP. The empirical results from U.S. publicly traded companies from 2009 to 2016 indicate that broad-based ESO is linked to positive CEP by companies, and provides some support for all proposed hypotheses. This study provides scholarly and practical implications for the effects of shared capitalist modes of ownership and employee engagement on corporate sustainability.

Keywords

corporate environmental performance employee as owner employee share ownership shared capitalism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguilera

R. V.

Aragón-Correa

J. A.

Marano

Tashman

P. A.

(2021). The corporate governance of environmental sustainability: A review and proposal for more integrated research. Journal of Management, 47(6), 1468–1497.

Albert

Whetten

D. A.

(1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263–295.

Bansal

Song

H. C.

(2017). Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 105–149.

Berrone

Cruz

Gomez-Mejia

L. R.

Larraza-Kintana

(2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less? Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 82–113.

Birkhead

(2024). Keeping them honest? Broad-based employee ownership and earnings management. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 32, 500–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12554

Blair

M. M.

(1995). Ownership and control: Rethinking corporate governance for the twenty-first century. The Brookings Institution.

Blair

M. M.

(1999). Firm-specific human capital and theories of the firm. In Blair

M. M.

Roe

M. J.

(Eds.), Employees & corporate governance (pp. 58–90). The Brookings Institution.

Blasi

J. R.

Freeman

Kruse

D. L.

(2016). Do broad-based employee ownership, profit sharing and stock options help the best firms do even better? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 54(1), 55–82.

Blasi

J. R.

Kruse

D. L.

(1992). The new owners: The mass emergence of employee ownership in public companies and what it means to American business. Harper Collins.

10.

Boodoo

M. U.

(2020). The Influence of unions on CSR: Is there a trade-off between employee-oriented and non–employee-oriented policies? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 58(4), 816–843.

11.

Bosse

D. A.

Phillips

R. A.

(2016). Agency theory and bounded self-interest. Academy of Management Review, 41(2), 276–297.

12.

Bova

Dou

Hope

O.-K. K.

(2015). Employee ownership firm disclosure. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(2), 639–673.

13.

Bova

Kolev

Thomas

J. K.

Zhang

X. F.

(2015). Non-executive employee ownership and corporate risk. The Accounting Review, 90(1), 115–145.

14.

Buchko

A. A.

(1993). The effects of employee ownership on employee attitudes: An integrated causal model and path analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 30(4), 633–657.

15.

Bundy

Vogel

Zachary

M. A.

(2018). Organization–stakeholder fit: A dynamic theory of cooperation, compromise, and conflict between an organization and its stakeholders. Strategic Management Journal, 39(2), 476–501.

16.

Burbidge

J. B.

Magee

Robb

A. L.

(1988). Alternative transformations to handle extreme values of the dependent variable. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(401), 123–127.

17.

Calza

Profumo

Tutore

(2016). Corporate ownership and environmental proactivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(6), 369–389.

18.

Chang

(1990). Employee stock ownership plans and shareholder wealth: An empirical investigation. Financial Management, 19(1), 48–58.

19.

Chatterji

A. K.

Toffel

M. W.

(2010). How firms respond to being rated. Strategic Management Journal, 31(9), 917–945.

20.

Chin

Hambrick

D. C.

Treviño

L. K.

(2013). Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), 197–232.

21.

Combs

Liu

Hall

Ketchen

(2006). How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 501–528.

22.

Coombs

J. E.

Gilley

K. M.

(2005). Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: Main effects and interactions with financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 827–840.

23.

Cordeiro

J. J.

Sarkis

(2008). Does explicit contracting effectively link CEO compensation to environmental performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(5), 304–317.

24.

Cornelissen

Himmler

Koenig

(2011). Perceived unfairness in CEO compensation and work morale. Economics Letters, 110(1), 45–48.

25.

Crilly

Sloan

(2012). Enterprise logic: Explaining corporate attention to stakeholders from the “inside-out.” Strategic Management Journal, 33(10), 1174–1193.

26.

Cropanzano

Mitchell

M. S.

(2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.

27.

Dam

Scholtens

(2012). Does ownership type matter for corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(3), 233–252.

28.

De Roeck

Maon

. (2018). Building the theoretical puzzle of employees’ reactions to corporate social responsibility: An integrative conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(3), 609–625.

29.

Dimson

Karakaş

(2015). Active ownership. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(12), 3225–3268.

30.

Drago

Garvey

G. T.

(1998). Incentives for helping on the job: Theory and evidence. Journal of Labor Economics, 16(1), 1–25.

31.

Dutton

J. E.

Dukerich

J. M.

(1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 517–554.

32.

Edinger-Schons

L. M.

Lengler-Graiff

Scheidler

Wieseke

(2019). Frontline employees as corporate social responsibility (CSR) ambassadors: A quasi-field experiment. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(2), 359–373.

33.

Eisenhardt

K. M.

(1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.

34.

Fabrizi

Mallin

Michelon

(2014). The role of CEO’s personal incentives in driving corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(2), 311–326.

35.

Ferrell

Liang

Renneboog

(2016). Socially responsible firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 122(3), 585–606.

36.

Freeman

R. B.

Blasi

J. R.

Kruse

D. L.

(2010). Introduction. In Freeman

R. B.

Blasi

J. R.

Kruse

D. L.

(Eds.), Shared capitalism at work: Employee ownership, profit and gain sharing, and broad-based stock options (pp. 1–37). University of Chicago Press.

37.

Freeman

R. B.

Medoff

J. L.

(1984). What do unions do. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 38(2), 244–263.

38.

Gambeta

Koka

B. R.

Hoskisson

R. E.

(2019). Being too good for your own good: A stakeholder perspective on the differential effect of firm-employee relationships on innovation search. Strategic Management Journal, 40(1), 108–126.

39.

Gordon

(1999). Employee stock ownership in economic transitions: The case of United and the airline industry. In Blair

M. M.

Roe

M. J.

(Eds.), Employees & corporate governance (pp. 317–354). Brooking Institution Press.

40.

Han

J. H.

Shin

Castellano

W. G.

Konrad

A. M.

Kruse

D. L.

Blasi

J. R.

(2020). Creating mutual gains to leverage a racially diverse workforce: The effects of firm-level racial diversity on financial and workforce outcomes under the use of broad-based stock options. Organization Science, 31(6), 1515–1537.

41.

Harden

E. E.

Kruse

D. L.

Blasi

J. R.

(2010). Who has a better idea? Innovation, shared capitalism, and human resources policies. In Kruse

D. L.

Freeman

R. B.

Blasi

J. R.

(Eds.), Shared capitalism at work: Employee ownership, profit and gain sharing, and broad-based stock options (pp. 225–253). University of Chicago Press.

42.

Heinkel

Kraus

Zechner

(2001). The effect of green investment on corporate behavior. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36(4), 431–449.

43.

Hochberg

Y. V.

Lindsey

(2010). Incentives, targeting, and firm performance: An analysis of non-executive stock options. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(11), 4148–4186.

44.

Hsieh

N.-H.

(2009). Does global business have a responsibility to promote just institutions? Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(2), 251–273.

45.

Huselid

M. A.

(1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635–672.

46.

Jain

Zaman

Harjoto

(2023). Behavioral agency model and corporate social irresponsibility: Uncovering the implication of fairness in CEO compensation. Journal of Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231174873

47.

Jensen

M. C.

(2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235–256.

48.

Jones

D. A.

Willness

C. R.

Heller

K. W.

(2016). Illuminating the signals job seekers receive from an employer’s community involvement and environmental sustainability practices: Insights into why most job seekers are attracted, others are indifferent, and a few are repelled. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 426.

49.

Kim

E. H.

Ouimet

(2010). Employee capitalism or corporate socialism? Broad-based employee stock ownership [Paper presentation, March 6, 2008]. AFA 2010 Atlanta Meetings Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1107974

50.

Kim

K. Y.

Patel

P. C.

(2017). Employee ownership and firm performance: A variance decomposition analysis of European firms. Journal of Business Research, 70, 248–254.

51.

King

B. G.

Felin

Whetten

D. A.

(2010). Perspective—Finding the organization in organizational theory: A meta-theory of the organization as a social actor. Organization Science, 21(1), 290–305.

52.

King

B. G.

Whetten

D. A.

(2008). Rethinking the relationship between reputation and legitimacy: A social actor conceptualization. Corporate Reputation Review, 11, 192–207.

53.

Knez

Simester

(2001). Firm-wide incentives and mutual monitoring at Continental Airlines. Journal of Labor Economics, 19(4), 743–772.

54.

Knobe

(2003). Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis, 63(3), 190–194.

55.

Kruse

D. L.

(2002). Research evidence on prevalence and effects of employee ownership. Journal of Employee Ownership Law and Finance, 14(4), 65–90.

56.

Kruse

D. L.

(2022). Does employee ownership improve performance? IZA World of Labor 2022, 311. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.311.v2

57.

Kruse

D. L.

Blasi

J. R.

(2000). The new employee-employer relationship. In Ellwood

Blank

Blasi

Kruse

Niskanen

Lynn-Dyson

(Eds.), A working nation: Workers, work, and government in the new economy (pp. 42–91). Russell Sage.

58.

Kruse

D. L.

Freeman

R. B.

Blasi

J. R.

(2010). Appendix A: The shared capitalist thermometer index. In Kruse

D. L.

Freeman

R. B.

Blasi

J. R.

(Eds.), Shared capitalism at work: Employee ownership, profit and gain sharing, and broad-based stock options (pp. 403–406). University of Chicago Press.

59.

Kumar

Sureka

Lim

W. M.

Kumar Mangla

Goyal

(2021). What do we know about business strategy and environmental research? Insights from Business Strategy and the Environment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3454–3469.

60.

Kurland

(2018). ESOP plus Benefit Corporation: Ownership culture with benefit accountability. California Management Review, 60(4), 51–73.

61.

Kurtulus

F. A.

Kruse

D. L.

(2017). How did employee ownership firms weather the last two recessions? Employee ownership, employment stability, and firm survival: 1999-2011. WE Upjohn Institute.

62.

Lange

Bundy

Park

(2022). The social nature of stakeholder utility. Academy of Management Review, 47(1), 9–30.

63.

Lee

Graves

S. B.

Waddock

(2018). Doing good does not preclude doing well: Corporate responsibility and financial performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 14(4), 764–781.

64.

Lee

B. H.

Waddock

Graves

S. B.

(2006). Does firm performance reduce managerial opportunism? The impact of performance-based compensation and firm performance on illegal accounting restatement. In Kolb

R. W.

(Ed.), The ethics of executive compensation (pp. 32–54). Blackwell Publishing.

65.

Levinson

(1996). Environmental regulations and manufacturers’ location choices: Evidence from the Census of Manufactures. Journal of Public Economics, 62(1–2), 5–29.

66.

Lowitzsch

Hashi

(2014). The promotion of employee ownership and participation. Inter-University Center for European Commission’s DG MARKT. European Union.

67.

Mael

Ashforth

B. E.

(1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123.

68.

Manner

M. H.

(2010). The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 53–72.

69.

Mattingly

J. E.

Berman

S. L.

(2006). Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini ratings data. Business & Society, 45(1), 20–46.

70.

McWilliams

Siegel

(2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.

71.

Monks

R. A.

Minow

(2011). Corporate governance (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

72.

Morck

Shleifer

Vishny

R. W.

(1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293–315.

73.

MSCI ESG Research. (2019). MSCI ESG KLD STATS: 1991-2018 Data Sets. MSCI Inc.

74.

O’Boyle

E. H.

Patel

P. C.

Gonzalez-Mulé

(2016). Employee ownership and firm performance: A meta-analysis. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(4), 425–448.

75.

Pendleton

Deakin

(2007). Corporate governance and workplace employment relations: The potential of WERS 2004. Industrial Relations Journal, 38(4), 338–355.

76.

Pendleton

Gospel

(2013). Corporate governance and labor. In Wright

Siegel

D. S.

Keasey

Filatotchev

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate governance (pp. 634–657) Oxford University Press.

77.

Pendleton

Robinson

(2010). Employee stock ownership, involvement, and productivity: An interaction-based approach. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 64(1), 3–29.

78.

Peterson

H. L.

Vredenburg

(2009). Morals or economics? Institutional investor preferences for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 1–14.

79.

Pierce

J. L.

Rubenfeld

S. A.

Morgan

(1991). Employee ownership: A conceptual model of process and effects. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 121–144.

80.

Polman

Bhattacharya

C. B.

(2016). Engaging employees to create a sustainable business. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 14(4), 34–39.

81.

Poulain-Rehm

Lepers

(2013). Does employee ownership benefit value creation? The case of France (2001–2005). Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 325–340.

82.

Rhoades

Eisenberger

Armeli

(2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 825.

83.

Rousseau

D. M.

Shperling

(2003). Pieces of the action: Ownership and the changing employment relationship. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 553–570.

84.

Sharfman

(1996). A concurrent validity study of the KLD social performance ratings data. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3), 287–296.

85.

Strike

V. M.

Gao

Bansal

(2006). Being good while being bad: Social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 850–862.

86.

Thompson

P. B.

Shanley

McWilliams

(2013). Ownership culture and strategic adaptability. Journal of Business Strategies, 30(2), 145–179.

87.

Wagner

(2010). Corporate social performance and innovation with high social benefits: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(4), 581–594.

88.

Wagner

S. H.

Parker

C. P.

Christiansen

N. D.

(2003). Employees that think and act like owners: Effects of ownership beliefs and behaviors on organizational effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 56(4), 847–871.

89.

Walls

J. L.

Berrone

Phan

P. H.

(2012). Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management Journal, 33(8), 885–913.

90.

Wang

Heugens

P. P.

Wijen

(2024). Green by affiliation? Ownership identity and environmental management system adoption in Chinese business groups. Journal of Management, 50(4), 1331–1360. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221143721

91.

Wiefek

Rosen

Garbinsky

(2019). Promoting employee ownership: A look at the states. Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership, 2(3), 183–189.

92.

Wong

E. M.

Ormiston

M. E.

Tetlock

P. E.

(2011). The effects of top management team integrative complexity and decentralized decision making on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1207–1228.

93.

Young-Hyman

Magne

Kruse

(2023). A real utopia under what conditions? The economic and social benefits of workplace democracy in knowledge-intensive industries. Organization Science, 34(4), 1353–1382.

94.

Zhao

Lee

(2023). How does board interlock network matter for sustainability? A social learning approach to corporate environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(8), 5889–5908.