The Effect of Country Economic Institutions and Cultural Values on Government Policy and Societal Compliance in the Covid-19 Pandemic

Abstract

Using data from 88 countries, we test hypotheses linking a country’s economic freedom and cultural values with the propensity and timing of decisions to impose stringent policies to combat the spread of Covid-19, as well as society’s compliance with those restrictive measures. Our analysis supports hypotheses that a country’s economic freedom and cultural dimensions of individualism and masculinity predict early implementation of stringent policies. After accounting for endogeneity, we find that individualism also helps explain residents’ compliance with stringent measures. These findings illustrate how institutions and cultural values influence government policies and societal compliance.

Keywords

citizen compliance Covid-19 cultural values economic freedom government policies

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beetham

(2013). The legitimation of power. Macmillan International Higher Education.

Borg

M. A.

(2014). Cultural determinants of infection control behaviour: Understanding drivers and implementing effective change. Journal of Hospital Infection, 86(3), 161–168.

Brockner

Ackerman

Greenberg

Gelfand

M. J.

Francesco

A. M.

Chen

Z. X.

Leung

Bierbrauer

Gómez

Kirkman

B. L.

Shapiro

D. L.

(2001). Culture and procedural justice: The moderating influence of power distance on reactions to voice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 300–315.

Chen

Frey

C. B.

Presidente

(2021). Culture and contagion: Individualism and compliance with COVID-19 policy. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 190, 191–200.

Chen

Peng

Rieger

M. O.

Wang

(2021). Institutional and cultural determinants of speed of government responses during COVID-19 pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1–9.

Dheer

R. J.

Egri

C. P.

Treviño

L. J.

(2021). A cross-cultural exploratory analysis of pandemic growth: The case of COVID-19. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(9), 1871–1892.

Forum of Federations. (2021). The global network on federalism and devolved governance. https://forumfed.org/about/

Freedom House. (2020). Global freedom score. https://freedomhouse.org/countries/freedom-world/scores

Frey

C. B.

Chen

Presidente

(2020). Democracy, culture, and contagion: Political regimes and countries responsiveness to Covid-19. Covid-19 Economics, 18, 1–20.

10.

Gapminder. (2021). Geographies. https://www.gapminder.org/data/geo

11.

Ghemawat

Reiche

B. S.

(2016). Cultural distance and national cultural differences. In Ghemawat

(Ed.), The laws of globalization and business applications (pp. 239–279). Cambridge University Press.

12.

Gini Index. (2020). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI

13.

Gokmen

Baskici

Ercil

(2021). The impact of national culture on the increase of Covid-19: A cross-country analysis of European countries. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 8, 1–8.

14.

Google

L. L. C.

(2021). Google COVID-19 community mobility reports. https://www.google.com/covid19/mobility/

15.

Greene

(2020, March 30). State of emergency: How different countries are invoking extra powers to stop the COVID-19. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/state-of-emergency-how-different-countries-are-invoking-extra-powers-to-stop-the-COVID-19-134495

16.

Gross

(2020). Emergency powers in the time of Coronavirus . . . and beyond. Just Security, Reiss Center on Law and Security, New York University School of Law.

17.

Hale

Kira

Petherick

Phillips

Webster

(2020). Oxford COVID-19 government response tracker, Blavatnik School of Government. Data Use Policy: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY Standard.

18.

Helmke

Levitsky

(2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 725–740.

19.

Hofstede

(1995). Insurance as a product of national values. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 20(4), 423–429.

20.

Hofstede

(2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. SAGE.

21.

Hofstede Insights. (2020). Compare countries. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/

22.

Holmes

R. M.

Miller

Hitt

M. A.

Salmador

M. P.

(2013). The interrelationship among informal institutions, formal institutions, and inward foreign direct investment. Journal of Management, 39(2), 531–566.

23.

House

R. J.

Hanges

P. J.

Javidan

Dorfman

P. W.

Gupta

(Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. SAGE.

24.

International Center for Non Profit Law. (2022). COVID-19 civic freedom tracker. https://www.icnl.org/covid19tracker/

25.

International Labour Organization. (2021). ILO monitor: COVID-19 and the world of work (7th ed.). https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@dcomm/documents/briefingnote/wcms_767028.pdf

26.

Jepperson

(1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In Powell

W. W.

DiMaggio

(Eds.), The New institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143–163). University of Chicago Press.

27.

Kauffman

Kraay

(2020). World Bank Worldwide governance indicators. http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/

28.

Kipfer

Mohamud

(2021). The pandemic as political emergency. Studies in Political Economy, 102(3), 268–288.

29.

Linden

Mathur

M. B.

VanderWeele

T. J.

(2019). EVALUE: Stata module for conducting sensitivity analyses for unmeasured confounding in observational studies. http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s458592.html

30.

J. G.

Jin

English

A. S.

(2021). Collectivism predicts mask use during COVID-19. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(23), e2021793118.

31.

Markus

Kitayama

(1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

32.

Melton

R. J.

Sinclair

R. C.

(2021). Culture and COVID-19: A global analysis of the successes of collectivist countries and the failures of individualist countries. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3954093

33.

Messner

(2020). The institutional and cultural context of cross-national variation in COVID-19 outbreaks. Medrxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.30.20047589

34.

Miller

Kim

A. B.

Roberts

J. M.

(2020). 2020 index of economic freedom. Heritage Foundation.

35.

Nelson

M. A.

(2021). The timing and aggressiveness of early government response to COVID-19: Political systems, societal culture, and more. World Development, 146, 105550.

36.

Oster

(2019). Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 37(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2016.1227711

37.

O’Sullivan

Healy

A. E.

Breen

M. J.

(2014). Political legitimacy in Ireland during economic crisis: Insights from the European social survey. Irish Political Studies, 29(4), 547–572.

38.

Peterson

M. F.

Smith

P. B.

(2008). Social structures and processes in cross cultural management. In Smith

P. B.

Peterson

M. F.

Thomas

D. C.

(Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural management research (pp. 35–58). SAGE.

39.

Porcher

(2021). Culture and the quality of government. Public Administration Review, 81, 333–343.

40.

Roser

Ortiz-Ospina

(2020). Our World in data COVID-19 dataset. Our World in Data. https://github.com/owid/covid-19-data/tree/master/public/data

41.

Roser

Ritchie

Ortiz-Ospina

Hasell

(2020). COVID-19 pandemic (Covid-19). Our World in Data.

42.

Rothstein

(2009). Creating political legitimacy: Electoral democracy versus quality of government. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 311–330.

43.

Tang

Koveos

P. E.

(2008). A framework to update Hofstede’s cultural value indices: Economic dynamics and institutional stability. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), 1045–1063.

44.

Taras

Kirkman

B. L.

Steel

(2010). Examining the impact of culture’s consequences: A three decade, multi-level, meta-analytic review of Hofstede’s cultural value dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 405–439.

45.

Weber

McManus Warnell

(2020). Exploring the relationship of variant degrees of national economic freedom to the ethical profiles of millennial business students in eight countries. Business & Society, 61(2), 457–495.

46.

Wittenberg-Cox

(2020, April 13). What do countries with the best Coronavirus responses have in common? Women leaders. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/avivahwittenbergcox/2020/04/13/what-do-countries-with-the-best-coronavirus-reponses-have-in-common-women-leaders/?sh=33c307c93dec

47.

The World Bank. (2020a). 2019 GDP per capita, PPP (current international $). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD

48.

The World Bank. (2020b). 2019 population. World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/

49.

World Health Organization. (2019). World Health Organization global health expenditures database. https://apps.who.int/nha/database/Select/Indicators/en

50.

Zucker

L. G.

(1987). Normal change or risky business: Institutional effects on the “hazard” of change in hospital organizations, 1959–79. Journal of Management Studies, 24(6), 671–700.