AguinisH.GlavasA. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 932–968.
2.
BacharachS. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14, 496–515.
3.
BaileyW.SpicerA. (2007). When does national identity matter? Convergence and divergence in international business ethics. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1462–1480.
4.
BambergerP. (2008). Beyond contextualization: Using context theories to narrow the micro-macro gap in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 839–846.
5.
BanerjeeS. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51–79.
6.
BapujiH.BrownJ. A.de BakkerF. G. A.HigginsC.RehbeinK.SpicerA. (2020). Something old, something new: Continuity and change at Business & Society. Business & Society, 59, 791–798.
7.
BapujiH.de BakkerF. G. A.BrownJ. A.HigginsC.RehbeinK.SpicerA. (2020). Business and society research in times of the corona crisis. Business & Society, 59, 1067–1078.
8.
BarnettM. L.HenriquesI.HustedB. W. (2020). Beyond good intentions: Designing CSR initiatives for greater social impact. Journal of Management, 46, 937–964.
9.
BrownJ. A.de Bakker F. G. A.BapujiH.HigginsC.RehbeinK.SpicerA. (2022). Building on its past: The future of business and society scholarship. Business & Society, 61, 967–979.
10.
ByronK.PostC. (2016). Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance, 24, 428–442.
11.
CappelliP.ShererP. D. (1991). The missing role of context in OB: The need for meso-level approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 55–110.
12.
ChappleW.MoonJ. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Business & Society, 44, 415–441.
13.
ClarkC.RieraM.IborraM. (2022). Toward a theoretical framework of corporate social irresponsibility: Clarifying the gray zones between responsibility and irresponsibility. Business & Society, 61, 1473–1511.
14.
CraneA.HenriquesI.HustedB. W. (2018). Quants and poets: Advancing methods and methodologies in business and society research. Business & Society, 57, 3–25.
15.
CraneA.HenriquesI.HustedB. W.MattenD. (2015). Defining the scope of Business & Society. Business & Society, 54, 427–434.
16.
CraneA.HenriquesI.HustedB. W.MattenD. (2016). Publishing country studies in Business & Society: Or, do we care about CSR in Mongolia. Business & Society, 55, 3–10.
17.
DahlsrudA. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 1–13.
18.
D’CruzP.NoronhaE.KatiyarS. (2022). Meaningfulness and impact of academic research: Bringing the global south to the forefront. Business & Society, 61, 839–844.
19.
de MarchiB.FuntowiczS.RavetzJ. (1996). Seveso: A paradoxical classic disaster. In MitchellJ. K. (Ed.), The long road to recovery: Community responses to industrial disaster (pp. 86–120). United Nations University.
20.
DmytriyevS. D.FreemanR. E.HorischJ. (2021). The relationship between stakeholder theory and corporate social responsibility: Differences, similarities, and implications for social issues in management. Journal of Management Studies, 58, 1441–1470.
21.
DonaldsonT.DunfeeT. W. (1999). Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics. Harvard Business School Press.
22.
ElsbachK. D.KramerR. M. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of qualitative organizational research: Innovative pathways and methods. Routledge.
23.
FissP. C. (2009). Case studies and the configurational analysis of organizational phenomena. In RaginC.ByrneD. (Eds.), Handbook of case study methods (pp. 424–440). SAGE.
24.
FlemingP. (2012). The end of corporate social responsibility: Crisis and critique. SAGE.
25.
GondJ.-P.CraneA. (2010). Corporate social performance disoriented: Saving the lost paradigm?Business & Society, 49, 677–703.
26.
HackmanJ. R. (2003). Learning more by crossing levels: Evidence from airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 905–922.
27.
HalmeM.RintamäkiJ.KnudsenJ. S.LankoskiL.KuismaM. (2020). When is there a sustainability case for CSR? Pathways to environmental and social performance improvements. Business & Society, 59, 1181–1227.
28.
HirschP. M.LevinD. Z. (1999). Umbrella advocates versus validity police: A life-cycle model. Organization Science, 10, 199–212.
29.
JamaliD.Lund-ThomsenP.KharaN. (2017). CSR institutionalized myths in developing countries: An imminent threat of selective decoupling. Business & Society, 56, 454–486.
30.
JenkinsH. (2004). A critique of conventional CSR theory: An SME perspective. Journal of General Management, 29(4), 37–57.
31.
JohnsG. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386–408.
32.
MaloneyM. M.BresmanH.Zellmer-BruhnM. E.BeaverG. R. (2016). Contextualization and context theorizing in teams research: A look back and a path forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10, 891–942.
33.
MargolisJ.WalshJ. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.
34.
MattenD.MoonJ. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404–424.
35.
McWilliamsA.SiegelD. S. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification?Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609.
36.
McWilliamsA.SiegelD. S. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127.
37.
MeuerJ.RupiettaC. (2017). Integrating QCA and HLM for multilevel research on organizational configurations. Organizational Research Methods, 20, 324–342.
38.
OlsenT.RehbeinK.Snelson-PowellA.Westermann-BehayloM. (2022). Human rights in the oil and gas industry: When are policies and practices enough to prevent abuse?Business & Society, 61, 1512–1557.
39.
PanwarR.PandeyV.SuddabyR.VidalN. G. (2022). Did India’s CSR mandate enhance or diminish firm value?Business & Society, 00075603221085962.
40.
RaginC. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. University of Chicago Press.
SchneiderA. (2020). Bound to fail? Exploring the systemic pathologies of CSR and their implications for CSR research. Business & Society, 59, 1303–1338.
43.
SoundararajanV.SpenceL. J.ReesC. (2018). Small business and social irresponsibility in developing countries: Working conditions and “evasion” institutional work. Business & Society, 57, 1301–1336.
44.
SubramaniamN.KansalM.BabuS. (2017). Governance of mandated corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Indian government-owned firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 143, 543–563.
45.
SunW.DingZ. (2021). Is doing bad always punished? A moderated longitudinal analysis on corporate social irresponsibility and firm value. Business & Society, 60, 1811–1848.
46.
UllmannA. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance. Academy of Management Review, 10, 540–557.
47.
van OosterhoutH. J.HeugensP. P. M. A. R. (2008). Much ado about nothing: A conceptual critique of CSR. In CraneA.McWilliamsA.MattenD.MoonJ.SiegelD. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 197–224). Oxford University Press.
48.
VishwanathanP.van OosterhoutH. J.HeugensP. P. M. A. R.DuranP.van EssenM. (2020). Strategic CSR: A concept building meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 57, 314–350.
49.
WangQ.DouJ.JiaS. (2016). A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The moderating effect of contextual factors. Business & Society, 55, 1083–1121.
50.
WhettenD. A. (2009). An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 5, 29–55.
51.
WindsorD. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 93–114.
52.
XuH.ZhangN. (2022). From contextualizing to context theorizing: Assessing context effects in privacy research. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4249
53.
ZhaoX.MurrellA. J. (2016). Revisiting the corporate social performance-financial performance link: A replication of Waddock and Graves. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 2378–2388.