In this study, I examine the role racial minorities in the boardroom can play in reducing social injustice by promoting more equal access to mortgage credit to minority households. I develop a simple theoretical model that posits directors who are racial minorities provide the credit unions they govern with a perspective that shapes lenders’ trust of minority applicants. This trust is shaped by homophily and the tendency of individuals to prefer interactions with similar individuals. Using mortgage loan data from a cross-section of credit unions in the United States from 185,446 applications, I find that credit unions where the majority of board members are minorities are less likely to reject a similarly qualified minority applicant than their counterparts. Governance by minority directors significantly reduces the effects of discrimination faced by minority applicants. The board’s effect is strongest in minority neighborhoods and where the homophily is stronger between directors and applicants.
AignerD. J.CainG. G. (1977). Statistical theories of discrimination in labor markets. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 30, 175–187.
2.
AveryR. B.BrevoortK. P.CannerG. B. (2007). Opportunities and issues in using HMDA data. Journal of Real Estate Research, 29, 351–379.
3.
AyusoS.RodriguezM. A.Garcia-CastroR.ArinoM. A. (2014). Maximizing stakeholders’ interests: An empirical analysis of the stakeholder approach to corporate governance. Business & Society, 53, 414–439.
4.
BapujiH.ErtugG.ShawJ. D. (2020). Organizations and societal economic inequality: A review and way forward. Academy of Management Annals, 14, 60–91.
5.
BeckerG. S. (1957). The economics of discrimination (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
6.
BerkovecJ. A. (1994). Race, redlining, and residential mortgage loan performance. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 9, 263–294.
7.
BlackH. A.CollinsM. C.CyreeK. B. (1997). Do black-owned banks discriminate against black borrowers?Journal of Financial Services Research, 11, 189–204.
8.
BlackH. A.RobinsonB. L.SchweitzerR. L. (2001). Comparing lending decisions of minority-owned and white-owned banks: Is there discrimination in mortgage lending?Review of Financial Economics, 10, 23–39.
9.
BlackburnM.VermilyeaT. (2006). A comparison of unexplained racial disparities in bank-level and market-level models of mortgage lending. Journal of Financial Services Research, 29(2), 125–147.
10.
BlauP. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. Free Press.
11.
BoginA.DoernerW. M.LarsonW. D. (2016). Local house price dynamics: New Indices and stylized facts (FHFA Staff Working Paper Series, 16-01). FHFA.
12.
BosticR. W. (2003). A test of cultural affinity in home mortgage lending. Journal of Financial Services Research, 23(2), 89–112.
13.
BuseK.BernsteinR. S.BilimoriaD. (2016). The influence of board diversity, board diversity policies and practices, and board inclusion behaviors on nonprofit governance practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 133, 179–191.
14.
CarterD. A.SimkinsB. J.SimpsonW. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38, 33–53.
15.
CrosonR.GneezyU. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 1–27.
16.
DaltonD. R.DailyC. M.EllstrandA. E.JohnsonJ. L. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 269–290.
17.
DamarajuN. L.MakhijaA. K. (2018). The role of social proximity in professional CEO appointments: Evidence from caste/religion-based hiring of CEOs in India. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 2051–2074.
18.
ElyD. (2014). Credit unions and risk. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 46, 80–111.
19.
EndrikatJ.de VilliersC.GuentherT. W.GuentherE. M. (2021). Board characteristics and corporate social responsibility: A meta-analytic investigation. Business & Society, 60, 2099–2135.
20.
EvansK.SalaizA.PathakS.VeraD. (2022). Community influential directors and corporate social performance. Business & Society, 61, 225–263.
21.
FismanR.ParavisiniD.VigV. (2017). Cultural proximity and loan outcomes. American Economic Review, 107, 457–492.
22.
ForkerJ.GrosvoldJ.WardA. M. (2014). Management models and priorities in member associations: Is credit unions’ community involvement crowded-out?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(2_suppl), 105S–123S.
23.
ForbesD. P.MillikenF. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24, 489–505.
24.
FriedH. O.LovellC. A. K.Vanden EeckautP. (1993). Evaluating the performance of U.S. credit unions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 17, 251–265.
25.
GoennerC. F. (2010). Discrimination and mortgage lending in Boston: The effects of model uncertainty. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 40, 260–285.
26.
GompersP. A.MukharlyamovV.XuanY. (2016). The cost of friendship. Journal of Financial Economics, 119, 626–644.
27.
HafsiT.TurgutG. (2013). Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 463–479.
28.
HarjotoM.LaksmanaI.LeeR. (2015). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 641–660.
29.
HegdeD.TumlinsonJ. (2014). Does social proximity enhance business partnerships: Theory and evidence from ethnicity’s role in US venture capital. Management Science, 60, 2355–2380.
30.
HillierA. E. (2003). Spatial analysis of historical redlining: A methodological exploration. Journal of Housing Research, 14, 137–167.
31.
HillmanA. J.CannellaA. A.PaetzoldR. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 235–255.
32.
HillmanA. J.DalzielT. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28, 383–396.
33.
HillmanA. J.KeimG. D.LuceR. A. (2001). Board composition and stakeholder performance: Do stakeholder directors make a difference?Business & Society, 40, 295–314.
34.
HolmesA.HorvitzP. (1994). Mortgage redlining: Race, risk, and demand. Journal of Finance, 49, 81–99.
35.
IbarraH. (1995). Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 673–703.
36.
ImbensG. W. (2015). Matching methods in practice: Three examples. Journal of Human Resources, 50, 373–419.
37.
JanT.McGregorJ.HoyerM. (2021, August26). Corporate America’s $50 billion vow. The Washington Post, A1.
38.
JohnsonS. G.SchnatterlyK.HillA. D. (2013). Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management, 39, 232–262.
39.
Korver-GlennE. (2018). Compounding inequalities: How racial stereotypes and discrimination accumulate across the stages of housing exchange. American Sociological Review, 83, 627–656.
40.
LogsdonJ. M.Van BurenH. J. (2008). Justice and large corporations: What do activist shareholders want?Business & Society, 47, 523–548.
41.
MaceyJ. R.O’HaraM. (2003). The corporate governance of banks. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 91–107.
42.
MarsdenP. V. (1988). Homogeneity in confiding relations. Social Networks, 10, 57–76.
43.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
44.
MunnellA. H.TootellG. B.BrowneL. E.McEneaneyJ. (1996). Mortgage lending in Boston: Interpreting HMDA data. American Economic Review, 86, 25–53.
NevilleF.ForresterJ. K.O’TooleJ.RidingA. (2018). Why even bother trying? Examining discouragement among racial-minority entrepreneurs. Journal of Management Studies, 55, 424–456.
47.
NoriegaJ.BlairE. (2008). Advertising to bilinguals: Does the language of advertising influence the nature of thoughts?Journal of Marketing, 72(5), 69–83.
48.
PalviaA.VähämaaE.VähämaaS. (2014). Are female CEOs and chairwomen more conservative and risk averse? Evidence from the banking industry during the financial crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 131, 577–594.
49.
PatelP. C.LenkaS.ParidaV. (in press). Caste-based discrimination, microfinance credit scores, and microfinance loan approvals among females in India. Business & Society.
50.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. (1978). The external control of organizations. Harper & Row.
51.
PostC.ByronK. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1546–1571.
52.
PostC.RahmanN.RubowE. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 50, 189–223.
53.
QuillianL.PagerD. (2001). Black neighbors, higher crime? The role of racial stereotypes in evaluations of neighborhood crime. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 717–767.
54.
RichardO. C. (2000). Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 164–177.
55.
RuefM.AldrichH. E.CarterN. M. (2003). The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 195–222.
SecchiD.SeriR. (2017). Experienced discrimination in home mortgage lending: A case of hospital employees in Northern Italy. Business & Society, 56, 1068–1104.
58.
SmithW. J.WokutchR. E.HarringtonK. V.DennisB. S. (2001). An examination of the influence of diversity and stakeholder role on corporate social orientation. Business & Society, 40, 266–294.
WardA. M.ForkerJ. (2017). Financial management effectiveness and board gender diversity in member-governed, community financial institutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 141, 351–366.
63.
WheelerC. H.OlsonL. M. (2015). Racial differences in mortgage denials over the housing cycle: Evidence from U.S. metropolitan areas. Journal of Housing Economics, 30, 33–49.
64.
WimmerA.LewisK. (2010). Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on Facebook. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 583–642.
65.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
