Alongside scholarly and societal dimensions of research impact, the meaningfulness of research, emerging from the link to context, is crucial. Authentic inclusion of Global South scholars based in the Global South aids these objectives.
AbhimallaR. K.DashD. P.BabaV. V.StokesP.D’CruzP. (2014). Doing and disseminating meaningful research. Research World, 11, Article S11.1. http://www1.ximb.ac.in/RW.nsf/pages/S11.1
2.
BansalP.SharmaG. (2022). Three different approaches to impact: Translating, cocreating, and performing. Business & Society, 61(4), 827–832. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211015926
3.
D’CruzP.NoronhaE.BandayM. U. L.ChakrabortyS. (2022). Place matters: (Dis) embeddedness and child labourers’ experiences of depersonalized bullying in Indian Bt cottonseed global production networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 176(2), 241-263. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04676-1
4.
EvettsJ. (2003). The sociological analysis of professionalism: Occupational change in the modern world. International Sociology, 18, 395–415.
5.
GannonM. J.PillaiR. (2013). Understanding global cultures: Metaphorical journeys through 31 nations, clusters of nations, continents and diversity. SAGE.
6.
MasonC. (2014). A short history of Asia. Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
NoronhaE.D’CruzP. (2009). Employee identity in Indian call centres: The notion of professionalism. SAGE.
8.
NoronhaE.MagalaS. (2017). Going Dutch, remaining Indian: The work experiences of IT expatriates. In NoronhaE.D’CruzP. (Eds.), Critical perspectives on work and employment in globalizing India (pp. 283–303). Springer.
9.
RavalN.PalJ. (2019). Making a “Pro”: “Professionalism” after platforms in beauty-work. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–17.
