Rankings have dramatically proliferated over the past several decades. An often-overlooked impact of this proliferation is that it has facilitated the institutionalization of an imaginary of the modern world as a stratified order, whose actors are imagined as continuously striving to perform better than others. To better understand this impact, we need to take a closer look at rankings’ premises and the way these resonate with the broader institutional environment of which rankings are a part.
BrankovicJ. (2021). “Measure of shame”: Media career of the Global Slavery Index. In RingelL.EspelandW. N.SauderM.WerronT. (Eds.), Worlds of rankings (pp. 103–125). Emerald Publishing.
2.
EspelandW. N.SauderM. (2016). Engines of anxiety: Academic rankings, reputation, and accountability. Russell Sage Foundation.
3.
LandahlJ. (2020). The PISA Calendar: Temporal governance and international large-scale assessments. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52, 625–639.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
6.
RingelL.EspelandW. N.SauderM.WerronT. (Eds.). (2021). Worlds of rankings (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 74). Emerald Publishing.
7.
SauderM.EspelandW. N. (2009). The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 74, 63–82.
8.
WerronT. (2015). Why do we believe in competition? A historical-sociological view of competition as an institutionalized modern imaginary. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 16, 186–210.
9.
WerronT.RingelL. (2017). Rankings in a comparative perspective. Conceptual remarks. In LessenichS. (Ed.), Geschlossene Gesellschaften. Verhandlungen des 38. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Bamberg 2016 (pp. 1–10). Deutsche Gesellschaft für Soziologie.
