The Three-Legged Stool: Synthesizing and Extending Our Understanding of the Career Advancement Facilitators of Persons With Disabilities in Leadership Positions
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2021
The Three-Legged Stool: Synthesizing and Extending Our Understanding of the Career Advancement Facilitators of Persons With Disabilities in Leadership Positions
I examine the career advancement facilitators of organizational stakeholders who may be identified as simultaneously “core” and “fringe” in this article, via the insights of 21 leaders with disabilities. To navigate barriers and advance their careers, these leaders benefited from three categories of facilitators, including career self-management strategies, social networks, and organizational and societal factors. Facilitators are synthesized with a metaphor, the three-legged stool, which depicts three foundational pillars that underlie the leaders’ success. Focusing on an understudied element of the social networks pillar, I examine how leaders’ external networks (family, friends, acquaintances, and role models) facilitated their career advancement. Findings point to the role of strong and weak ties in developing leaders’ career self-management strategies as well as their access to core stakeholder positions. Last, contributions, implications, and limitations of this article are discussed.
AcemogluD.AngristJ. D. (2001). Consequences of employment protection? The case of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of Political Economy, 109(5), 915–957.
2.
Araten-BergmanT. (2016). Managers’ hiring intentions and the actual hiring of qualified workers with disabilities. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(14), 1510–1530.
3.
BaldridgeD. C.BeattyJ.BoehmS. A.KulkarniM.MooreM. E. (2015). Persons with (dis)abilities. In ColellaA. J.KingE. B (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of workplace discrimination. Oxford Handbooks Online.
4.
BaldridgeD. C.KulkarniM. (2017). The shaping of sustainable careers post hearing loss: Toward greater understanding of adult onset disability, disability identity, and career transitions. Human Relations, 70(10), 1217–1236.
5.
BarlingJ.ChristieA.HoptionA. (2010). Leadership. In ZedeckS. (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 183–240). American Psychological Association.
6.
BarlingJ.CloutierA. (2017). Leaders’ mental health at work: Empirical, methodological, and policy directions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 1–13.
7.
BeattyJ. E.BaldridgeD. C.BoehmS. A.KulkarniM.ColellaA. J. (2018). On the treatment of persons with disabilities in organizations: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management, 58(2), 119–137.
8.
BebbingtonD.ÖzbilginM. (2013). The paradox of diversity in leadership and leadership for diversity. Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.
9.
BoucherC. (2017). The roles of power, passing, and surface acting in the workplace relationships of female leaders with disability. Business & Society, 56(7), 1004–1032.
10.
BraddockD.BachelderL. (1994). The glass ceiling and persons with disabilities. The Glass Ceiling Commission, U.S. Department of Labor.
11.
BurtR. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.
12.
ChandlerD. E.KramK. E.YipJ. (2011). An ecological systems perspective on mentoring at work: A review and future prospects. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 519–570.
13.
CharltonJ. I. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. University of California Press.
ClairJ. A.BeattyJ. E.MacLeanT. L. (2005). Out of sight but not out of mind: Managing invisible social identities in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 78–95.
16.
ColellaA. J.BruyèreS. M. (2011). Disability and employment: New directions for industrial and organizational psychology. In ZedeckS. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Volume 1: Building and developing the organization (pp. 473–503). American Psychological Association.
17.
ColellaA. J.StoneD. L. (2005). Workplace discrimination towards persons with disabilities: A call for some new research directions. In DipboyeR. L.ColellaA. J. (Eds.), Discrimination at work: The psychological and organizational bases (pp. 227–253). Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
CollinsP. H.BilgeS. (2016). Intersectionality. John Wiley.
19.
CornelissenJ. P. (2005). Beyond compare: Metaphor in organization theory. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 751–764.
20.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
21.
CuddyA. J.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 61–149.
22.
DeLeireT. (2000). The wage and employment effects of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of Human Resources, 35(4), 693–715.
23.
Disability Rights Commission. (2006). Statistics: Representations of disable people in senior positions. Disability Rights Commission.
24.
DonaldsonT.PrestonL. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
25.
DwertmannD. J.BoehmS. A. (2016). Status matters: The asymmetric effects of supervisor–subordinate disability incongruence and climate for inclusion. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1), 44–64.
26.
EaglyA. H.CarliL. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth. Harvard Business School Press.
27.
EpitropakiO.MartinR. (2005). From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 659–676.
28.
FerrisG. R.BuckleyM. R.AllenG. M. (1992). Promotion systems in organizations. Human Resource Planning, 15(3), 47–68.
29.
FletcherD.SarkarM. (2012). A grounded theory of psychological resilience in Olympic champions. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(5), 669–678.
30.
FreemanR. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
GalbreathJ. (2011). Are there gender-related influences on corporate sustainability? A study of women on boards of directors. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(1), 17–38.
33.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (2nd ed.). Aldine.
34.
GrahamS. (2017). The influence of external and internal stakeholder pressures on the implementation of upstream environmental supply chain practices. Business & Society, 1–33.
35.
GranovetterM. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
36.
GreenhausJ. H.ParasuramanS. (1993). Job performance attributions and career advancement prospects: An examination of gender and race effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55(2), 273–297.
37.
GreenwoodM. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315–327.
38.
GuzmanJ.YassiA.BarilR.LoiselP. (2008). Decreasing occupational injury and disability: The convergence of systems theory, knowledge transfer and action research. Work, 30(3), 229–239.
39.
HartS. L.SharmaS. (2004). Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(1), 7–18.
40.
HillmanA. J.KeimG. D.LuceR. A. (2001). Board composition and stakeholder performance: Do stakeholder directors make a difference?Business & Society, 40(3), 295–314.
41.
HolvinoE. (2010). Intersections: The simultaneity of race, gender and class in organization studies. Gender, Work & Organization, 17(3), 248–277.
42.
IbarraH. (1995). Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 673–703.
43.
IshidaH.SuK. H.SpilermanS. (2002). Models of career advancement in organizations. European Sociological Review, 18(2), 179–198.
44.
JammaersE.ZanoniP.HardonkS. (2016). Constructing positive identities in ableist workplaces: Disabled employees’ discursive practices engaging with the discourse of lower productivity. Human Relations, 69(6), 1365–1386.
45.
KingZ. (2004). Career self-management: Its nature, causes and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 112–133.
46.
KruseD.SchurL. (2003). Employment of people with disabilities following the ADA. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 42(1), 31–66.
47.
KulkarniM. (2012). Social networks and career advancement of people with disabilities. Human Resource Development Review, 11(2), 138–155.
48.
KulkarniM.GopakumarK. V. (2014). Career management strategies of people with disabilities. Human Resource Management, 53(3), 445–466.
49.
Le BerM. J.BranzeiO. (2010). Towards a critical theory of value creation in cross-sector partnerships. Organization, 17(5), 599–629.
LinN. (1990). Social resources and social mobility: A structural theory of status attainment. In BreigerR. L. (Ed.), Social mobility and social structure (pp. 247–171). Cambridge University Press.
52.
LinN. (1999). Social networks and social attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 467–487.
53.
LutharS. S.CicchettiD.BeckerB. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543–562.
54.
MajietS.AfricaA. (2015). Women with disabilities in leadership: The challenges of patriarchy. Agenda, 29(2), 101–111.
55.
McCarthyL.MuthuriJ. N. (2018). Engaging fringe stakeholders in business and society research: Applying visual participatory research methods. Business & Society, 57(1), 131–173.
56.
McCrackenG. (1988). The long interview. Sage.
57.
MeindlJ. R.EhrlichS. B.DukerichJ. M. (1985). The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(1), 78–102.
58.
MilesM. B.HubermanM. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
59.
MitchellR. K.AgleB. R.WoodD. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
60.
NoonanB. M.GallorS. M.Hensler-McGinnisN. F.FassingerR. E.WangS.GoodmanJ. (2004). Challenge and success: A Qualitative study of the career development of highly achieving women with physical and sensory disabilities. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 68–80.
61.
RaoK.TiltC. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 327–347.
62.
RenL. R.PaetzoldR. L.ColellaA. (2008). A meta-analysis of experimental studies on the effects of disability on human resource judgments. Human Resource Management Review, 18(3), 191–203.
63.
RoulstoneA.WilliamsJ. (2014). Being disabled, being a manager: “glass partitions” and conditional identities in the contemporary workplace. Disability & Society, 29(1), 16–29.
64.
SchurL.KruseD.BlasiJ.BlanckP. (2009). Is disability disabling in all workplaces? Workplace disparities and corporate culture. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 48(3), 381–410.
65.
SciorK. (2011). Public awareness, attitudes and beliefs regarding intellectual disability: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(6), 2164–2182.
66.
ShahS.ArnoldJ.TraversC. (2004). The impact of childhood on disabled professionals. Children & Society, 18(3), 194–206.
67.
SpradleyJ. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
68.
StoneD. L.ColellaA. J. (1996). A model of factors affecting the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 352–401.
69.
TharenouP. (1997). Explanations of managerial career advancement. Australian Psychologist, 32(1), 19–28.
TurnerR. H. (1960). Sponsored and contest mobility and the school system. American Sociological Review, 25(6), 855–867.
72.
Von SchraderS.MalzerV.BruyereS. (2014). Perspectives on disability disclosure: The importance of employer practices and workplace climate. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 26(4), 237–255.
73.
Wilson-KovacsD.RyanM. K.HaslamS. A.RabinovichA. (2008). “Just because you can get a wheelchair in the building doesn’t necessarily mean that you can still participate”: Barriers to the career advancement of disabled professionals. Disability & Society, 23(7), 705–717.
74.
World Health Organization. (2011). World report on disabilities.
75.
YoungA. E.WasiakR.RoesslerR. T.McPhersonK. M.AnemaJ. R.Van PoppelM. N. (2005). Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: Stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4), 543–556.
76.
YueA. R. (2008). Acquired disability and returning to work: Towards a stakeholder approach. Journal of Workplace Rights, 13(1), 73–91.
77.
ZollersN. J.YuY.-H. (1998). Leadership in an able-bodied social context: One principal’s impact on an inclusive urban school. Disability & Society, 13(5), 743–761.
