Responsible investment is increasingly prevalent, and both financial and moral concerns can drive such investment. In this article, we investigate how responsible investors of different wealth weigh financial and moral arguments. Prior research on different factors that may codetermine responsible investment behavior yield competing predictions about the influence of personal wealth on investment. We conduct a large-scale natural field experiment on responsible investment, wherein we treat investors with financial, moral, and no arguments. We find that there is a statistically and economically significant difference in responsiveness to financial and moral arguments between investors of different wealth. Specifically, financial arguments are more effective than are moral arguments for high wealth investors but not for low wealth investors, and the effect is particularly high for the wealthiest investors. The findings hold for several different measures of wealth. Our findings contribute to the understanding of the moderating effect of wealth on responsible investment choice. Furthermore, these insights may enable more fine-tuned strategies to stimulate responsible investment among different individual investor segments.
AllcottH.MullainathanS. (2010). Behavior and energy policy. Science, 327, 1204-1205.
2.
AndreoniJ.NikiforakisN.StoopJ. (2017). Are the rich more selfish than the poor, or do they just have more money? A natural field experiment (No. w23229). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
3.
ArielyD.BrachaA.MeierS. (2009). Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. American Economic Review, 99, 544-555.
BarneaA.CronqvistH.SiegelS. (2010). Nature or nurture: What determines investor behavior?Journal of Financial Economics, 98, 583-604.
6.
Barreda-TarrazonaI.Matallín-SáezJ. C.Balaguer-FranchM. R. (2011). Measuring investors’ socially responsible preferences in mutual funds. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 305-330.
7.
BauerR.SmeetsP. (2015). Social identification and investment decisions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 117, 121-134.
8.
BealD. J.GoyenM.PhilipsP. (2005). Why do we invest ethically?Journal of Investing, 14(3), 66-78.
9.
BénabouR.TiroleJ. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica, 77(305), 1-19.
10.
BerryR. H.YeungF. (2013). Are investors willing to sacrifice cash for morality?Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 477-492.
11.
BollenN. P. B. (2007). Mutual fund attributes and investor behavior. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42, 683-708.
BrunnermeierM. K.NagelS. (2008). Do wealth fluctuations generate time-varying risk aversion? Micro-evidence on individuals. American Economic Review, 98, 713-736.
14.
CalvetL.CampbellJ. Y.SodiniP. (2009). Measuring the financial sophistication of households. American Economic Review, 99, 393-398.
15.
CamererC. (2015). The promise and success of lab-field generalizability in experimental economics: A critical reply to Levitt and List. In FrechetteG. R.SchotterA. (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economic methodology (pp. 249–295). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16.
CharnessG.FehrE. (2015). From the lab to the real world. Science, 350, 512-513.
17.
CheahE. T.JamaliD.JohnsonJ. E.SungM. C. (2011). Drivers of corporate social responsibility attitudes: The demography of socially responsible investors. British Journal of Management, 22, 305-323.
18.
ChoiJ. J.LaibsonD.MadrianB. C.MetrickA. (2009). Reinforcement learning and savings behavior. Journal of Finance, 64, 2515-2534.
19.
DaZ.EngelbergJ.GaoP. (2011). In search of attention. Journal of Finance, 66, 1461-1499.
20.
DelmasM. A.Aragon-CorreaJ. A. (2016). Field experiments in corporate sustainability research: Testing strategies for behavior change in markets and organizations. Organization & Environment, 29, 391-400.
DerwallJ.KoedijkK. C. G.Ter HorstJ. R. (2011). A tale of values-driven and profit-seeking social investors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35, 2137-2147.
23.
DioufD.HebbT.TouréE.-H. (2016). Exploring factors that influence social retail investors’ decisions: Evidence from Desjardins fund. Journal of Business Ethics, 134, 45-67.
24.
DornD.HubermanG. (2005). Talk and action: What individual investors say and what they do. Review of Finance, 9, 437-481.
25.
DøskelandT.PedersenL. J. T. (2015). Investing with brain or heart? A field experiment on responsible investment. Management Science, 62, 1632-1644.
26.
DuboisD.RuckerD. D.GalinskyA. D. (2015). Social class, power, and selfishness: When and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 436-449.
27.
EcclesR. G.IoannouI.SerafeimG. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60, 2835-2857.
28.
EdmansA. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 101, 621-640.
FalkA.SzechN. (2013). Morals and markets. Science, 340, 707-711.
31.
FehrE.FischbacherU. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425, 785-791.
32.
FlammerC. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science, 61, 2549-2568.
GalloL. C.BogartL. M.VranceanuA. M.MatthewsK. A. (2005). Socioeconomic status, resources, psychological experiences, and emotional responses: A test of the reserve capacity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 386-399.
35.
GlacK. (2009). Understanding socially responsible investing: The effect of decision frames and trade-off options. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 41-55.
36.
GlacK. (2012). The impact and source of mental frames in socially responsible investing. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 13, 184-198.
37.
GrinblattM.KeloharjuM. (2001). What makes investors trade?Journal of Finance, 56, 589-616.
38.
GuinoteA.CotziaI.SandhuS.SiwaP. (2015). Social status modulates prosocial behavior and egalitarianism in preschool children and adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 731-736.
39.
GutscheG.Köbrich-LeónA.ZieglerA. (2016). On the relevance of psychological motives, values, and norms for socially responsible investments: An econometric analysis (Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics No. 41-2016). Marburg, Germany: University of Marburg.
40.
HarrisonG. W.ListJ. A. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 1009-1055.
41.
HongH.KacperczykM. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93, 15-36.
42.
HongH.KostovetskyL. (2012). Red and blue investing: Values and finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 103, 1-19.
43.
JanssonM.BielA. (2011). Motives to engage in sustainable investment: A comparison between institutional and private investors. Sustainable Development, 19, 135-142.
44.
JonesT. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366-395.
45.
JunkusJ. C.BerryT. C. (2010). The demographic profile of socially responsible investors. Managerial Finance, 36, 474-481.
46.
KacperczykM.NosalJ. B.StevensL. (2014). Investor sophistication and capital income inequality (No. w20246). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
47.
KaustiaM.KnüpferS. (2008). Do investors overweight personal experience? Evidence from IPO subscriptions. Journal of Finance, 63, 2679-2702.
48.
KempfA.OsthoffP. (2007). The effect of socially responsible investing on portfolio performance. European Financial Management, 13, 908-922.
49.
KorndörferM.EgloffB.SchmukleS. C. (2015). A large scale test of the effect of social class on prosocial behavior. PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0133193.
50.
KrausM. W.PiffP. K.Mendoza-DentonR.RheinschmidtM. L.KeltnerD. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119, 546-572.
51.
LapananN. (2018). The investment behavior of socially responsible individual investors. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 70, 214-226.
52.
LevittS. D.ListJ. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 153-174.
53.
MackenzieC.LewisA. (1999). Morals and markets: The case of ethical investing. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9, 439-452.
54.
McLachlanJ.GardnerJ. (2004). A comparison of socially responsible and conventional investors. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 11-25.
55.
NilssonJ. (2008). Investment with a conscience: Examining the impact of pro-social attitudes and perceived financial performance on socially responsible investment behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 307-325.
56.
OdeanT. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses?Journal of Finance, 53, 1775-1798.
57.
OdeanT. (1999). Do investors trade too much?American Economic Review, 89, 1279-1298.
58.
PiffP. K. (2014). Wealth and the inflated self: Class, entitlement, and narcissism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 34-43.
59.
PiffP. K.KrausM. W.CôtéS.ChengB. H.KeltnerD. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 771-784.
60.
PiffP. K.StancatoD. M.CôtéS.Mendoza-DentonR.KeltnerD. (2012). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 4086-4091.
61.
PuaschunderJ. M. (2017). Socio-psychological motives of socially responsible investors. In KoseJ.MakhijaA. K.FerrisS. P. (Eds.), Advances in financial economics: Vol. 19. Global corporate governance (pp. 209-247). Bradford, UK: Emerald.
62.
RenneboogL.Ter HorstJ.ZhangC. (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32, 1723-1742.
63.
RiedlA.SmeetsP. (2017). Why do investors hold socially responsible mutual funds?Journal of Finance, 72, 2505-2550.
64.
RivoliP. (2003). Making a difference or making a statement? Finance research and socially responsible investment. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13, 271-287.
SachdevaS.JordanJ.MazarN. (2015). Green consumerism: Moral motivations to a sustainable future. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 60-65.
67.
SimonH. A. (1959). Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. American Economic Review, 49, 253-283.
68.
SmeetsP.BauerR.GneezyU. (2015). Giving behavior of millionaires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 10641-10644.
69.
SmithK. B. (1985). I made it because of me: Beliefs about the causes of wealth and poverty. Sociological Spectrum, 5, 255-267.
70.
StatmanM. (2004). What do investors want?Journal of Portfolio Management, 30, 153-161.
71.
TrautmannS. T.van de KuilenG.ZeckhauserR. J. (2013). Social class and (un)ethical behavior: A framework, with evidence from a large population sample. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 487-497.
72.
WebleyP.LewisA.MackenzieC. (2001). Commitment among ethical investors: An experimental approach. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, 27-41.
73.
WhiteK.SimpsonB. (2013). When do (and don’t) normative appeals influence sustainable consumer behaviors?Journal of Marketing, 77, 78-95.
74.
WinsA.ZwergelB. (2015). Private ethical fund investors across countries and time: A survey-based review. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 7, 379-411.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
