Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has repeatedly been described as an “essentially contested concept,” which means that its signification is subject to continuous struggle. We argue that the “CSR institution” (CSRI; i.e., the set of standards and rules regulating corporate conduct under the banner of CSR) is legitimized by narratives which “decontest” the underlying concept of CSR in a manner that safeguards the CSRI from calls for alternative institutional arrangements. Examining several such narratives from a structuralist perspective, we find them to be permeated with six recurrent ambiguities that we show to be reflective of three deep-set taboos: the taboo of the noncongruency between corporate profit objectives and societal needs, the taboo of multinational firms’ continued contribution to the emergence of global socioenvironmental issues, and the taboo of the CSRI’s moderate results in solving these problems. We contend that the perpetuation of these taboos contributes to inhibiting substantial change in the way of doing business, and we sketch out possibilities for initiating a “recontestation” of CSR’s meaning.
AcquierA.GondJ. P.PasqueroJ. (2011). Rediscovering Howard R. Bowen’s legacy: The unachieved agenda and continuing relevance of social responsibilities of the businessman. Business & Society, 50, 607-646.
2.
AguileraR. V.RuppD. E.WilliamsC. A.GanapathiJ. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836-863.
3.
AlvessonM.KärremanD. (2016). Intellectual failure and ideological success in organization studies: The case of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25, 139-152.
4.
AlvessonM.SpicerA. (2012). Critical leadership studies: The case for critical performativity. Human Relations, 65, 367-390.
5.
AmaeshiK. M.AdiB. (2007). Reconstructing the corporate social responsibility construct in Utlish. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16, 3-18.
6.
AnnanK. (1999, February1). Secretary-General proposes Global Compact on Human Rights, Labour, Environment, in address to World Economic Forum in Davos. United Nations Secretary-General Press Release. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/press/en/1999/19990201.sgsm6881.html
7.
ArgyrosA. (1992). Narrative and chaos. New Literary History, 23, 659-673.
8.
BanerjeeS. B. (2011). Embedding sustainability across the organization: A critical perspective. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10, 719-731.
9.
BaumeisterR. F.LeithK. P. (1997). Biased steps toward reasonable conclusions: How self-deception remains hidden. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 106-107.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: First Anchor Books Edition.
12.
BinswangerM. (2009). Is there a growth imperative in capitalist economies? A circular flow perspective. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 31, 707-727.
13.
BodanskyD. (1999). The legitimacy of international governance: A coming challenge for international environmental law?The American Journal of International Law, 93, 596-624.
14.
BojeD. M.KhanF. R. (2009). Story-branding by empire entrepreneurs: Nike, child labour, and Pakistan’s soccer ball industry. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 22, 9-24.
15.
BoltanskiL.ChiapelloE. (2007). The New Spirit of Capitalism. London, England: Verso.
16.
BondyK.MoonJ.MattenD. (2012). An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multi-national corporations (MNCs): Form and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 281-299.
17.
BouckaertL. (2003). Reducing opportunism through moral commitment: The ethical paradox of management. In Weltzien HoivikH. V. (Ed.), Moral leadership in action (pp. 84-97). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
18.
BowenH. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York, NY: Harper.
19.
BrainJ. L. (1979). The last taboo: Sex and the fear of death. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.
20.
BrammerS.JacksonG.MattenD. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, 10, 3-28.
21.
BridgeG.McManusP. (2000). Sticks and stones: Environmental narratives and discursive regulation in the forestry and mining sectors. Antipode, 32, 10-47.
22.
BromleyP.PowellW. W. (2012). From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. The Academy of Management Annals, 6, 483-530.
23.
BrowneR. B. (Ed.). (1984). Forbidden fruits: Taboos and tabooism in culture. Bowling Green, OH: Popular Press.
24.
BrunoI.DidierE.VitaleT. (2014). Statactivism: Forms of action between disclosure and affirmation. Partecipazione e Conflitto (PACO), 7, 198-220.
CampbellJ. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 946-967.
27.
CarolloL.GuerciM. (2018). “Activists in a suit”: Paradoxes and metaphors in sustainability managers’ identity work. Journal of Business Ethics, 148, 249-268.
28.
CarvalhoL. F.RodriguesJ. (2006). On markets and morality: Revisiting Fred Hirsch. Review of Social Economy, 64, 331-348.
29.
ClarkB.YorkR. (2005). Carbon metabolism: Global capitalism, climate change, and the biospheric rift. Theory and Society, 34, 391-428.
30.
ClarkT.SalamanG. (1996). The management guru as organizational witchdoctor. Organization, 3, 85-107.
31.
CollinsJ. C.PorrasJ. I. (1996). Building your company’s vision. Harvard Business Review, 74(5), 65-77.
32.
CornelissenJ. P.DurandR.FissP. C.LammersJ. C.VaaraE. (2015). Putting communication front and center in institutional theory and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 40, 10-27.
CraneA.PalazzoG.SpenceL. J.MattenD. (2014). Contesting the value of “creating shared value.”California Management Review, 56, 130-153.
35.
CrookC. (2005, January22). The good company. Economist, pp. 3-4.
36.
CrossleyM. L. (2000). Narrative psychology, trauma and the study of self/identity. Theory & Psychology, 10, 527-546.
37.
CurbachJ. (2009). Die Corporate-Social-Responsibility-Bewegung [The Corporate-Social-Responsibility-Movement]. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
38.
DeightonJ.RomerD.McQueenJ. (1989). Using drama to persuade. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 335-343.
39.
EcoU. (1979). Lector in fabula: Le rôle du lecteur ou la Coopération interprétative dans les textes narratifs [Lector in fabula: The role of the reader or the interpretive cooperation in narrative texts]. Paris, France: Editions Grasset.
40.
EcoU. (1989). The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
41.
EisenbergE. M. (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 227-242.
42.
FaircloughN. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London, England: Routledge.
43.
FelberC. (2015). Change everything: Creating an economy for the common good. London, England: Zed Books.
44.
FischerH. R. (2001). Abductive reasoning as a way of worldmaking. Foundations of Science, 6, 361-383.
45.
FlemingP.JonesM. T. (2013). The end of corporate social responsibility: Crisis and critique. London, England: Sage.
46.
FosterR. J. (2010). Corporate oxymorons and the anthropology of corporations. Dialectical Anthropology, 34, 95-102.
47.
FoucaultM. (1971). Orders of discourse. Inaugural lecture delivered at the Collège de France. Social Science Information, 10(2), 7-30.
48.
FrancoZ. E.BlauK.ZimbardoP. G. (2011). Heroism: A conceptual analysis and differentiation between heroic action and altruism. Review of General Psychology, 15, 99-113.
49.
FransenL. W.KolkA. (2007). Global rule-setting for business: A critical analysis of multi-stakeholder standards. Organization, 14, 667-684.
50.
FreedenM. (2003). Ideology: A very short introduction (Vol. 95). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
51.
FreedenM. (2005). What should the “political” in political theory explore?Journal of Political Philosophy, 13, 113-134.
52.
FreedenM. (2006). Ideology and political theory. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11, 3-22.
53.
FrenchP. A. (1979). The corporation as a moral person. American Philosophical Quarterly, 16, 207-215.
54.
FriedlandR.AlfordR. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, Practices and Institutional Contradictions. In PowellW. W.The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232-263). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
55.
FriedmanM. (1970, September13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, pp. 33-33, 122-126.
56.
García-RosellJ. C. A. (2016). Discursive perspective on corporate social responsibility education: A story co-creation exercise. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-14. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3399-9?
57.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2012). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 15-31.
58.
GjølbergM. (2009). The origin of corporate social responsibility: Global forces or national legacies?Socio-economic Review, 7, 605-637.
59.
GondJ. P.MoonJ. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in retrospect and prospect: Exploring the life-cycle of an essentially contested concept. ICCSR Research Paper Series, 59, 1-40.
60.
GondJ. P.NybergD. (2017). Materializing power to recover corporate social responsibility. Organization Studies, 38, 1127-1148.
61.
GrafsteinR. (1981). The failure of Weber’s conception of legitimacy: Its causes and implications. The Journal of Politics, 43, 456-472.
62.
GrayR. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability… and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, 47-62.
63.
GreenM. C.BrockT. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701-721.
64.
GreimasA. J. (1971). Narrative grammar: Units and levels. Modern Language Notes, 86, 793-806.
65.
GreimasA. J.CourtésJ.RengstorfM.(1989). The cognitive dimension of narrative discourse. New Literary History, 20, 563-579.
66.
HaackP.SchoenebornD.WickertC. (2012). Talking the talk, moral entrapment, creeping commitment? Exploring narrative dynamics in corporate responsibility standardization. Organization Studies, 33, 815-845.
67.
HahnT.FiggeF.PinkseJ.PreussL. (2010). Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: You can’t have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19, 217-229.
68.
HahnT.FiggeF.PinkseJ.PreussL. (2018). A paradox perspective on corporate sustainability: Descriptive, instrumental, and normative aspects. Journal of Business Ethics, 148, 235-248.
69.
HahnT.PreussL.PinkseJ.FiggeF. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39, 463-487.
70.
HanlonG.FlemingP. (2009). Updating the critical perspective on corporate social responsibility. Sociology Compass, 3, 937-948.
71.
HansonK. O. (2011). The long history of conscious capitalism: A response to James O’Toole and David Vogel’s “Two and a Half Cheers for Conscious Capitalism.”California Management Review, 53(3), 77-82.
72.
HirschF. (2005). Social limits to growth. London, UK: Routledge. (Original work published 1976)
73.
HoffmannJ. (2018). Talking into (non) existence: Denying or constituting paradoxes of Corporate Social Responsibility. Human Relations, 71, 668-691.
74.
HumphreysM.BrownA. D. (2008). An analysis of corporate social responsibility at credit line: A narrative approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 403-418.
75.
HurrellA. (1994). A crisis of ecological viability? Global environmental change and the nation state. Political Studies, 42, 146-165.
JenkinsH. (2004). A critique of conventional CSR theory: An SME perspective. Journal of General Management, 29(4), 37-57.
78.
JonesM. T. (1996). Missing the Forest for the Trees: A Critique of the Social Responsibility Concept and Discourse. Business & Society, 35, 7-41.
79.
JonesM. T. (2009). Disrobing the emperor: Mainstream CSR research and corporate hegemony. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 20, 335-346.
80.
JoutsenvirtaM.UusitaloL. (2010). Cultural competences: An important resource in the industry–NGO Dialog. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 379-390.
81.
KallioT. J. (2007). Taboos in corporate social responsibility discourse. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 165-175.
82.
KaplanR. (2015). Who has been regulating whom, business or society? The mid-20th-century institutionalization of “corporate responsibility” in the USA. Socio-Economic Review, 13, 125-155.
83.
KazmiB. A.LecaB.NaccacheP. (2016). Is corporate social responsibility a new spirit of capitalism?Organization, 23, 742-762.
84.
KleinN. (2014). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
LabovW.WaletzkyJ. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In HelmJ. (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts: Proceedings of the American ethnological society. Seattle, WA: American Ethnological Society (pp. 12-44).
LeitchS.DavenportS. (2007). Strategic ambiguity as a discourse practice: The role of keywords in the discourse on “sustainable” biotechnology. Discourse Studies, 9, 43-61.
89.
LevyD.KaplanR. (2008). CSR and theories of global governance: Strategic contestation in global issue arenas. In CraneA.MattenD.McWilliamsA.MoonJ.SiegelD. S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of CSR (pp. 432-451). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
90.
LevyD.ScullyM. (2007). The institutional entrepreneur as modern prince: The strategic face of power in contested fields. Organization Studies, 28, 971-991.
91.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
92.
LockeR. M. (2013). The promise and limits of private power: Promoting labor standards in a global economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
93.
LombardoE.MeierP.VerlooM. (2010). Discursive dynamics in gender equality politics: What about “feminist taboos?”European Journal of Women’s Studies, 17, 105-123.
94.
LuhmannN. (2012). Die Moral der Gesellschaft [The Morals of Society]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp Verlag.
95.
LyotardJ. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (Vol. 10). Minnesota, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
96.
MarchJ. G.OlsenJ. P. (2006). Elaborating the “new institutionalism.” In RhodesR. A. W.BinderS.RockmanB. (Eds.),The Oxford handbook of political institutions (Vol. 5, pp. 3-20). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
97.
MarquisC.GlynnM. A.DavisG. F. (2007). Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32, 925-945.
98.
MattenD.MoonJ. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404-424.
99.
McAdamsD. P. (2006). The problem of narrative coherence. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 19, 109-125.
100.
MeadowsD.RandersJ.MeadowsD. (2004). Limits to growth: The 30-year update. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
101.
MenaS.PalazzoG. (2012). Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 527-556.
102.
MilneM. J.KearinsK.WaltonS. (2006). Creating adventures in wonderland: The journey metaphor and environmental sustainability. Organization, 13, 801-839.
103.
MoonJ. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15, 296-306.
104.
MouffeC. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. London, England: Verso.
105.
MuthuriJ. N.GilbertV. (2011). An institutional analysis of corporate social responsibility in Kenya. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 467-483.
106.
OkoyeA. (2009). Theorising corporate social responsibility as an essentially contested concept: Is a definition necessary?Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 613-627.
107.
O’TooleJ.VogelD. (2011). Two and a half cheers for conscious capitalism. California Management Review, 53, 60-76.
108.
PedersenE. R. G.NeergaardP.PedersenJ. T.GwozdzW. (2013). Conformance and deviance: Company responses to institutional pressures for corporate social responsibility reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22, 357-373.
109.
PikettyT. (2015). About capital in the twenty-first century. American Economic Review, 105(5), 48-53.
110.
Radcliffe-BrownA. R. (1939). Taboo. London, England: Cambridge University Press.
111.
RascheA. (2012). Global policies and local practice: Loose and tight couplings in multi-stakeholder initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 679-708.
112.
ReichT.WheelerS. C. (2016). The good and bad of ambivalence: Desiring ambivalence under outcome uncertainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 493-508.
113.
ReisiglM.WodakR. (2009). The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA). In WodakR.MeyerM. (Ed.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd Rev. ed., pp. 87-121). London, England: Sage.
114.
RiessmanC. K. (1993). Narrative analysis (Vol. 30). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
RoeE. (1994). Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
117.
ShamirR. (2004). The de-radicalization of corporate social responsibility. Critical Sociology, 30, 669-689.
118.
ShamirR. (2008). The age of responsibilization: On market-embedded morality. Economy and Society, 37, 1-19.
119.
ShamirR. (2011). Socially responsible private regulation: World-culture or world-capitalism?Law & Society Review, 45, 313-336.
120.
ShenhavS. R. (2015). Analyzing social narratives. New York, NY: Routledge.
121.
SisodiaR. S. (2011). Conscious capitalism: A better way to win: A response to James O’Toole and David Vogel’s “Two and a Half Cheers for Conscious Capitalism.”California Management Review, 53, 98-108.
122.
SklairL.MillerD. (2010). Capitalist globalization, corporate social responsibility and social policy. Critical Social Policy, 30, 472-495.
123.
SmithR. (2010). Beyond growth or beyond capitalism. Real World Economics Review, 53, 28-36.
124.
SmithW. K.GoninM.BesharovM. L. (2013). Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23, 407-442.
125.
SpicerA.AlvessonM.KärremanD. (2009). Critical performativity: The unfinished business of critical management studies. Human Relations, 62, 537-560.
126.
StegerM. B. (2005). Ideologies of globalization. Journal of Political Ideologies, 10, 11-30.
127.
ThompsonJ. B. (1990). Ideology and modern culture: Critical theory in the era of mass communication. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
128.
UttingP. (2005). Corporate responsibility and the movement of business. Development in Practice, 15, 375-388.
129.
Van der BylC. A.SlawinskiN. (2015). Embracing tensions in corporate sustainability: A review of research from win-wins and trade-offs to paradoxes and beyond. Organization & Environment, 28, 54-79.
130.
Van DijkT. A. (1976). Narrative macro-structures. PTL: A Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature, 1, 547-568.
131.
WaymireG. B.BasuS. (2008). Accounting is an evolved economic institution. Hanover, MA: Now Publishers.
132.
WhitemanG.WalkerB.PeregoP. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 307-336.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
