The global spread of corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices is widely explained in institutional-isomorphic terms: Corporations worldwide adopt CSR in reaction to isomorphic pressures exerted on them by a pro-CSR global environment, including normative calls for CSR, activist targeting, civil regulation frameworks, and educational activities. By contrast, this article considers the proactive agency of corporations in CSR diffusion, which is informed by nonmarket strategies that seek to instrumentally reshape the political and social environment of corporations. Applying a “channels-of-diffusion” perspective, we show that in the initial phase of CSR’s transnational diffusion—as exemplified by the cases of Venezuela (1962-1967) and Britain (1977-1981)—CSR traveled through learning exchanges between business elite “exporters” and “importers” whose engagement in diffusion addressed crisis-enhanced political threats and opportunities in the receiving country. The focal agents established national CSR business associations, which disseminated among local corporations CSR practices adapted to confront the challenges at hand. We identify the features of such “business-led cross-national diffusions of CSR”; formulate propositions regarding their conditions, dynamics, and effects; and suggest that further research of this mode of diffusion would advance a more nuanced and balanced understanding of CSR’s globalization.
AbrahamsonE. (2006). Review: Global ideas: How ideas, objects, and practices travel in the global economy by Barbara Czarniawska and Guje Sevón, eds. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 512-514.
2.
AguileraR. V.RuppD.WilliamsC. A.GanapathiJ. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multi-level theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836-863.
BarleyS. R. (2010). Building an institutional field to corral a government: A case to set an agenda for organization studies. Organization Studies, 31, 777-805.
5.
BlackM. (1992). A cause for our times: Oxfam—The first fifty years. Oxford, UK: Oxfam and Oxford University Press.
6.
BlankD. E. (1973). Politics in Venezuela. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
7.
BonillaF. (1970). The failure of elites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
BoswellJ.PetersJ. (1997). Capitalism in contention: Business leaders and political economy in modern Britain. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BoxenbaumE. (2006). Lost in translation: The making of Danish diversity management. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 939-948.
10.
BrittanS. (1978). How British is the British sickness?Journal of Law and Economics, 21, 245-268.
11.
Business in the Community. (1990). Full accounts (Annual report). London, England: Author.
12.
CampbellJ. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 946-967.
13.
CaprarD. V.NevilleB. A. (2012). “Norming” and “conforming”: Integrating cultural and institutional explanations for sustainability adoption in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 231-245.
14.
CarrollA. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38, 268-295.
15.
CarrollA. B.LipartitoK. J.PostJ. E.WerhaneP. H. (2012). Corporate responsibility: The American experience. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
CastellóI.GalangR. M. N. (2014). Looking for new forms of legitimacy in Asia. Business & Society, 53, 187-225.
17.
CheitE. F. (1964). The new place of business. In CheitE. F. (Ed.), The business establishment (pp. 96-111). New York, NY: John Wiley.
18.
CohnJ. (1970). Is business meeting the challenge of urban affairs?Harvard Business Review, 48, 68-82.
19.
Committee for Economic Development. (1971). Social responsibilities of business corporations. New York, NY: Author.
20.
CraneA.HenriquesI.HustedB.MattenD. (2015). Defining the scope ofBusiness & Society. Business & Society, 54, 427-434.
21.
CzarniawskaB.SevónJ. G. (Eds.). (1996). Translating organizational change. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
22.
CzarniawskaB.SevónJ. G. (2005). Global ideas: How ideas, objects and practices travel in a global economy. Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Business School Press.
23.
DashwoodH. S. (2012). The rise of global corporate social responsibility mining and the spread of global norms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
DelmasM. A.Montes-SanchoM. J. (2011). An institutional perspective on the diffusion of international management system standards: The case of the environmental management standard ISO 14001. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 102-132.
25.
DenzinN. K. (2006). Sociological methods: A sourcebook. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
26.
Department of the Environment. (1980, April9-10). Anglo-American conference on community involvement. Sunningdale Park, UK.
27.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
28.
Dividendo. (1964). Estatutos del dividendo voluntario para la cumunidad [Statutes of voluntary dividends to the community]. Caracas, Venezuela: Author.
Dividendo. (1967b). Organizaciones voluntarias de accion social: Catatlogo [Catalogue for statutes of voluntary dividends to the community]. Caracas, Venezuela: Author.
32.
DjelicM.-L. (1998). Exporting the American model: The postwar transformation of European business. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33.
DjelicM.-L. (2004). Social networks and country-to-country transfer: Dense and weak ties in the diffusion of knowledge. Socio-Economic Review, 2, 341-370.
34.
DjelicM.-L. (2008). Sociological studies of diffusion: Is history relevant?Socio-Economic Review, 6, 538-557.
35.
DobbinF.SimmonsB.GarrettG. (2007). The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning?Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 449-472.
36.
DryzekJ. S.DownesD.HunoldC.SchlosbergD. (2003). Green states and social movements: Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
37.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
38.
ElkinsZ.SimmonsB. (2005). On waves, clusters, and diffusion: A conceptual framework. Annals of the American Academy, 598, 33-51.
39.
EpsteinE. (1976). The social role of business enterprise in Britain: An American perspective: Part I. Journal of Management Studies, 13, 213-233.
40.
Esping-AndersenG. (1985). Politics against markets: The social democratic road to power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
FazeyI. H. (1987). The pathfinder: The origins of the enterprise agency in Britain. London, England: Financial Training Publications.
42.
FieldhouseR. (2005). Anti-apartheid: A history of the movement in Britain. London, England: Merlin Press.
43.
FligsteinN.McAdamD. (2012). A theory of fields. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
FlohrA.RiethL.SchwindenhammerS.WolfK. D. (2010). The role of business in global governance: Corporations as norm-entrepreneurs. Oxford, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
45.
FooksG.GilmoreA.CollinJ.HoldenC.LeeK. (2013). The limits of corporate social responsibility: Techniques of neutralization, stakeholder management and political CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 283-299.
46.
FransenL.BurgoonB. (2014). Privatizing or socializing corporate responsibility: Business participation in voluntary programs. Business & Society, 53, 583-619.
47.
FrenkelM. (2005). The politics of translation: How state-level political relations affect the cross-national travel of management ideas. Organization, 12, 275-301.
48.
FriedmannJ. (1965). Venezuela: From doctrine to dialogue. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
49.
GilbertD. U.BehnamM. (2012). Trust and the United Nations Global Compact: A network theory perspective. Business & Society, 52, 135-169.
50.
GilbertD. U.RascheA.WaddockS. (2011). Accountability in a global economy: The emergence of international accountability standards. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 23-44.
51.
GlynA. (2006). Capitalism unleashed: Finance globalization and welfare. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
52.
GraysonD.IrwinD. (1983). American business and job creation. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Project North East.
53.
GraysonD.NelsonJ. (2013). Corporate responsibility coalitions. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.
54.
GriffinL. J. (1992). Temporality, events, and explanation in historical sociology: An introduction. Sociological Methods Research, 20, 403-427.
55.
GuillénM. F. (1994). Models of management. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56.
HargreavesJ.DaumanJ. (1975). Business survival and social change. London, England: Associated Business Programmes.
57.
HealdM. (1970). The social responsibilities of business: Company and community, 1900-1960. Cleveland, OH: The Press of Case Western Reserve University.
58.
HeapR. (1977). ARC in community relations. Industrial and Commercial Training, 9(5), 187-189.
59.
HeilbronerR. (1964). The view from the top. In CheitE. F. (Ed.), The business establishment (pp. 1-36). New York, NY: John Wiley.
60.
HellmannR. (1979). Gold, the dollar, and the European currency systems : The seven year monetary war. New York, NY: Praeger.
61.
HiltonM.McKayJ.CrowsonN.MouhotJ.-F. (2013). The politics of expertise: How NGOs shaped modern Britain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
62.
HoffmanA. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 351-371.
63.
IBM UK & Urban & Economic Development Group. (1977, March). Creating work through small enterprise: Joint seminar report. London, England: Author.
64.
IrelandP.PillayR. G. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in a neoliberal age. In UttingP.MarquesJ. C. (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility and regulatory governance: Toward inclusive development? (pp. 77-104). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
65.
JamaliD.Lund-ThomsenP.KharaN. (2017). CSR institutionalized myths in developing countries: An imminent threat of selective decoupling. Business & Society, 56, 454-486.
66.
JohnsR. I. (1991). Company community involvement in the UK. Warwick, UK: Ruth I. Johns Associates.
67.
KaplanR. (2015). Who has been regulating whom, business or society? The mid-20th-century institutionalization of “corporate responsibility” in the USA. Socio-Economic Review, 13, 125-155.
68.
KhuranaR. (2007). From higher aims to hired hands: The social transformation of American business schools and the unfulfilled promise of management as a profession. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69.
KindermanD. (2012). Free us up so we can be responsible! The co-evolution of corporate social responsibility and neo-liberalism in the UK, 1977–2010. Socio-Economic Review, 10, 29-57.
70.
KindermanD. (2015). Explaining the rise of national corporate social responsibility: The role of global frameworks, world culture, and corporate interests. In TsutsuiK.LimA. (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in a globalizing world (pp. 107-146). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
71.
KingA. A.LenoxM. J. (2000). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s Responsible Care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 698-716.
72.
KingB. G.FelinT.WhettenD. A. (2010). Perspective—Finding the organization in organizational theory: A meta-theory of the organization as a social actor. Organization Science, 21, 290-305.
73.
KirkpatrickI.BullingerB.LegaF.DentM. (2013). The translation of hospital management models in European health systems: A framework for comparison. British Journal of Management, 24, 48-61.
74.
Labour Party. (1974). Report of the seventy second annual conference of the labour party. Blackpool, UK.
75.
LangleyA. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, 691-710.
76.
LeeC. K.StrangD. (2006). The international diffusion of public-sector downsizing: Network emulation and theory-driven learning. International Organization, 60, 883-909.
77.
LentA. (2001). British social movements since 1945: Sex, colour, peace and power. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
78.
LevyD. (1997). Environmental management and political sustainability. Organization & Environment, 10, 126-147.
79.
LieuwenE. (1954). Petroleum in Venezuela: A history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
80.
London Enterprise Agency. (1980, April9-10). The starting point: A paper on the UK experience. Paper presented at the Anglo-American Conference on Community Involvement, Sunningdale Park, UK.
81.
LoweP.GoyderJ. (1983). Environmental groups in politics. London, England: George Allen & Unwin.
82.
MacleanM.HarveyC.CleggS. R. (2016). Conceptualizing historical organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 41, 609-632.
83.
MahoneyJ. (1999). Nominal, ordinal, and narrative appraisal in macrocausal analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1154-1196.
84.
MäkinenJ.KourulaA. (2012). Pluralism in political corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 649-678.
85.
Maracay. (1963). Seminarion internacional de ejecutivos [International seminar of executives]. Maracay, Venezuela: Foundacion Creole.
86.
MarchandR. (2001). Creating the corporate soul: The rise of public relations and corporate imagery in American big business. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
87.
MarensR. (2008). Recovering the past: Reviving the legacy of the early scholars of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management History, 14, 55-72.
88.
MarinettoM. (1998). Corporate social involvement: Social, political and environmental issues in Britain and Italy. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
MattenD.MoonJ. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404-424.
91.
McCabeR. E. (1980, April9-10). Detroit renaissance 1970-1980: Its role in the revitalization of Detroit. Paper presented at the Anglo-American Conference on Community Involvement, Sunningdale Park, UK.
92.
McWilliamsA.SiegelD. S. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117-127.
93.
McWilliamsA.SiegelD. S. (2011). Creating and capturing value: Strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 37, 1480.
94.
MellahiK.FrynasJ. G.SunP.SiegelD. (2016). A review of the nonmarket strategy literature toward a multi-theoretical integration. Journal of Management, 42, 143-173.
95.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
96.
MeznarM. B.NighD. (1995). Buffer or bridge? Environmental and organizational determinants of public affairs activities in American firms. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 975-996.
97.
MitchellN. (1989). The generous corporation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
98.
MoonJ. (2004). Government as a driver of corporate social responsibility: The UK in comparative perspective (ICCSR Research Paper Series No. 20-2004). Nottingham, UK: Nottingham University Business School.
MullerM. (1974). The baby killer. London, England: War on Want.
101.
National Industrial Conference Board. (1968). Business amid urban crisis: Private-sector approaches to city problems. New York, NY: Author.
102.
NelsonR. L. (1970). Economic factors in the growth of corporation giving. New York, NY: National Bureau of Economic Research.
103.
OliverC.HolzingerI. (2008). The effectiveness of strategic political management: A dynamic capabilities framework. Academy of Management Review, 33, 496-520.
104.
OrlitzkyM.SiegelD. S.WaldmanD. A. (2011). Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability. Business & Society, 50, 6-27.
105.
PeachL. H.HargreavesJ. (1976). Social responsibility: The investment that pays off. Personnel Management, 8, 20-24.
106.
PilkingtonA. (1984). Business in the community: Where do we go from here?Policy Studies, 4(4), 12-22.
107.
PocockC. C. (1977). More jobs: A small cure for a big problem. London, England: The Ashridge Lecture.
108.
PocockC. C. (1979a, Winter). Global change: The political challenge. The Mckinsey Quarterly, pp. 21-34.
109.
PocockC. C. (1979b). Trends in international business and the consequences for British industry and management education in the 1980s. Management Education and Development, 10, 194-199.
110.
PostJ. E.MurrayE. A.DickieR. B.MahonJ. F. (1982). The public affairs function in American corporations: Development and relations with corporate planning. Long Range Planning, 15(2), 12-21.
111.
PrzeworskiA.TeuneH. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
112.
RascheA.WaddockS.McIntoshM. (2012). The United Nations global compact: Retrospect and prospect. Business & Society, 52, 6-30.
113.
RivasD. (2002). Missionary capitalist: Nelson Rockefeller in Venezuela. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
114.
RogersE. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: The Free Press.
115.
RoweJ. K. (2005). Corporate social responsibility as business strategy. In LipschutzR. D. (Ed.), Globalization, governmentality and global politics: Regulation for the rest of us? (pp. 130-170). New York, NY: Routledge.
116.
RowlinsonM.HassardJ.DeckerS. (2014). Research strategies for organizational history: A dialogue between historical theory and organization theory. Academy of Management Review, 39, 250-274.
117.
Sahlin-AnderssonK. (1996). Imitating by editing success: The construction of organizational fields. In CzarniawskaB.SevonG. (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 69-92). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
118.
SegerlundL. (2010). Making corporate social responsibility on international concern: Norm construction in a globalizing world. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University.
119.
SethiS. P. (2002). Corporate codes of conduct and the success of globalization. Ethics & International Affairs, 16, 89-106.
120.
ShamirR. (2004). The de-radicalization of corporate social responsibility. Critical Sociology, 30, 669-689.
121.
SkeyA.BaxterM. (1976). Integrating the company with the community. Industrial and Commercial Training, 8(2), 51-53.
122.
SkinnerR. W.ShanklinW. L. (1978). The changing role of public relations in business firms. Public Relations Review, 4(2), 40-45.
123.
SkocpolT. (1979). States and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
124.
SmallboneD. (1991). Partnership in economic development: The case of U.K. local enterprise agencies. Policy Studies Review, 10(2/3), 87-98.
125.
SouleS. A. (2009). Contention and corporate social responsibility. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
126.
SpectorB. (2008). Business responsibilities in a divided world: The Cold War roots of the corporate social responsibility movement. Enterprise & Society, 9, 314-336.
127.
SteinerG. A. (1997). Strategic planning. New York, NY: Free Press.
128.
SteurerR. (2010). The role of governments in corporate social responsibility: Characterising public policies on CSR in Europe. Policy Science, 43, 49-72.
TaylorW. C.LindemanJ. (1955). The Creole Petroleum Corporation in Venezuela. New York, NY: National Planning Association.
131.
ThatcherM. (1981, August3). Letter to Sir Alastair Pilkington. London, England: The British Government.
132.
ThelenK. (2004). How institutions evolve. In MahoneyJ.RueschemeyerD. (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 208-240). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
133.
TugwellF. (1975). The politics of oil in Venezuela. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
134.
TurnerV. M. (1979). The Venezuelan business community: Social responsibility and the accommodation of business to a changing political environment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.
135.
UseemM. (1984). The inner circle. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
136.
UttingP. (2002). Regulating business via multistakeholder initiatives: A preliminary assessment. In UttingP. (Ed.), Voluntary approaches to corporate responsibility (pp. 61-130). Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Non-Governmental Liaison Service.
137.
VogelD. (1986). National styles of business regulation: A case study of environmental protection. London, England: Cornell University Press.
138.
VogelD. (2005). The market for virtue: The Potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
139.
VogelD. (2008). Private global business regulation. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 261-282.
140.
VogelD. (2010). The private regulation of global corporate conduct: Achievements and limitations. Business & Society, 49, 68-87.
141.
WæraasA.NielsenJ. A. (2016). Translation theory “translated”: Three perspectives on translation in organizational research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18, 236-270.
142.
WellsC. A. H. (2002). The cycles of corporate social responsibility: An historical retrospective for the twenty-first century. Kansas Law Review, 51, 77-140.
143.
WernerT. (2012). Public forces and private politics in American big business. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
144.
WestneyE. D. (1987). Imitation and innovation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
145.
WhartonC. R. (1954). Aiding the community: A new philosophy for foreign investments. Harvard Business Review, 32(2), 64-72.
146.
WhelanG. (2012). The political perspective of corporate social responsibility: A critical research agenda. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 709-737.
147.
WilkinsM. (1975). The maturing of the multinational enterprise: American business abroad from 1914 to 1970. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
148.
WrightB. S. (1980). Large firms—Small firms: Employment in the 1980s. International Journal of Manpower, 1(3), 21-24.
149.
ZadekS. (2001). The civil corporation: The new economy of corporate citizenship. London, England: Earthscan.
