BoddewynJ. J. (2003). Understanding and advancing the concept of “nonmarket.”Business & Society, 42, 297-327.
2.
BrammerS.JacksonG.MattenD. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, 10, 3-28.
3.
ByronK.ThatcherS. M. (2016). Editors’ comments: “What I know now that I wish I knew then”—Teaching theory and theory building. Academy of Management Review, 41, 1-8.
4.
CarrollA. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38, 268-295.
5.
CorleyK. G.GioiaD. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution?Academy of Management Review, 36, 12-32.
6.
CraneA.HenriquesI.HustedB. W.MattenD. (2016). Publishing country studies in Business & Society: Or, do we care about CSR in Mongolia?Business & Society, 55, 3-10.
7.
De BakkerF. G.GroenewegenP.Den HondF. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & Society, 44, 283-317.
8.
DonaldsonT.PrestonL. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.
9.
DonaldsonT.WalshJ. P. (2015). Toward a theory of business. Research in Organizational Behavior, 35, 181-207.
10.
FrederickW. C. (1994). From CSR1 to CSR2: The maturing of business-and-society thought. Business & Society, 33, 150-164.
11.
FriedrichE.WüstenhagenR. (2015). Leading Organizations Through the Stages of Grief: The Development of Negative Emotions Over Environmental Change. Business & Society. doi:10.1177/0007650315576151
12.
GeertzC. (1994). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In MartinM.McIntyreL. C. (Eds.), Readings in the philosophy of social science (pp. 213-231). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
GetzK. A. (1997). Research in corporate political action integration and assessment. Business & Society, 36, 32-72.
14.
HartS. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20, 986-1014.
15.
HustedB. W. (2000). A contingency theory of corporate social performance. Business & Society, 39, 24-48.
16.
KingB. (2007). A social movement perspective of stakeholder collective action and influence. Business & Society, 47, 21-49.
17.
KolkA.Rivera-SantosM.RufínC. (2014). Reviewing a decade of research on the “Base/Bottom of the Pyramid” (BOP) concept. Business & Society, 53, 338-377.
18.
LewinK. (1951). Problems of research in social psychology. In CartwrightD. (Ed.), Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (pp. 155-169). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
19.
LockettA.MoonJ.VisserW. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in management research: Focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 115-136.
20.
MahonJ. F.WaddockS. A. (1992). Strategic issues management: An integration of issue life cycle perspectives. Business & Society, 31, 19-32.
21.
MintzbergH. (2005). Developing theory about the development of theory. In SmithK. G.HittM. A. (Eds.), Great minds in management: The process of theory development (pp. 355–372). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
RatcliffR.DoshiK. (2016). Using the Bass Model to analyze the diffusion of innovations at the base of the pyramid. Business & Society, 55, 271-298.
23.
SchererA. G.PalazzoG.MattenD. (2014). The business firm as a political actor: A new theory of the firm for a globalized world. Business & Society, 53, 143-156.
24.
SchrempfJ. (2014). A social connection approach to corporate responsibility: The case of the fast-food industry and obesity. Business & Society, 53, 300-332.
25.
ShumateM.O’ConnorA. (2010). The symbiotic sustainability model: Conceptualizing NGO–corporate alliance communication. Journal of Communication, 60, 577-609.
