Publishing Country Studies in Business & Society

Bailey W. Spicer A. (2007). When does national identity matter? Convergence and divergence in international business ethics. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1462-1480.

Battilana J. Dorado S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1419-1440.

Campbell J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 946-967.

Carroll A. B. Näsi J. (1997). Understanding stakeholder thinking: Themes from a Finnish conference. Business Ethics: A European Review, 6, 46-51.

Chapple W. Moon J. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Asia a seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Business & Society, 44, 415-441.

Crane A. Henriques I. Husted B. Matten D. (2015). Defining the scope of Business & Society. Business & Society, 54, 427-434.

Eisenhardt K. M. (1989). Building theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.

Evan W. M. Freeman R. E. (1993). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In Hoffman W. M. Frederick R. E. (Eds.), Business ethics: Readings and cases in corporate morality (pp. 145-154). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Freeman R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Hiss S. (2009). From implicit to explicit corporate social responsibility: Institutional change as a fight for myths. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19, 433-451.

Hofman P. S. Moon J. Wu B. (in press). Corporate Social Responsibility under authoritarian capitalism: Dynamics and prospects of state-led and society-driven CSR. Business & Society.

Jamali D. Lund-Thomsen P. Jeppesen S. (2015). SMEs and CSR in developing countries. Business & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0007650315571258

Jamali D. Sidani Y. (2011). Is CSR counterproductive in developing countries: The unheard voices of change. Journal of Change Management, 11, 69-71.

Jeong Y. Weiner R. J. (2012). Who bribes? Evidence from the United Nations’ oil-for-food program. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1363-1383.

Kinderman D. (2012). “Free us up so we can be responsible!” The co-evolution of corporate social responsibility and neo-liberalism in the UK, 1977-2010. Socio-Economic Review, 10, 29-57.

Lepoutre J. M. W. N. Valente M. (2012). Fools breaking out: The role of symbolic and material immunity in explaining institutional nonconformity. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 285-313.

Maignan I. (2001). Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 57-72.

Maignan I. Ralston D. A. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from businesses’ self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33, 497-514.

Matten D. Moon J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404-424.

McWilliams A. Siegel D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117-127.

Rossouw G. (2005). Business ethics and corporate governance in Africa. Business & Society, 44, 94-106.

Spicer A. Dunfee T. W. Bailey W. J. (2004). Does national context matter in ethical decision-making? An empirical test of integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 610-620.

Strand R. Freeman R. E. (2013). Scandinavian cooperative advantage: The theory and practice of stakeholder engagement in Scandinavia. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 65-85.

Teegen H. Doh J. P. Vachani S. (2004). The importance of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance and value creation: An international business research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 463-483.

Tsui A. S. (2004). Contributing to global management knowledge: A case for high quality indigenous research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21, 491-513.