We argue the need for academics to resist and challenge the hegemonic discourse of sustainable development within the corporate context. Laclau and Mouffe’s discourse theory provides a useful framework for recognizing the complex nature of sustainable development and a way of conceptualizing counter-hegemonies. Published empirical research that analyzes sustainable development discourse within corporate reports is examined to consider how the hegemonic discourse is constructed. Embedded assumptions within the hegemonic construction are identified including sustainable development as primarily about economic development, progress, growth, profitability, and “responsibly” managed levels of resource depletion. We call for multiple voices in the discursive field to debate and to resist closure and highlight the possibilities for academic researchers to actively resist the hegemonic construction. Specifically, we advocate vigilance and awareness, critical and reflective analyses, challenge and resistance based on other frames of reference, and strategies for communicating both within and outside the academy.
AdamsC. (2004). The ethical, social and environmental reporting-performance portrayal gap. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17, 731-757.
2.
ArchelP.HusillosJ.SpenceC. (2011). The institutionalisation of unaccountability: Loading the dice of corporate social responsibility discourse. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36, 327-343.
3.
BakanJ. (2004). The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. New York, NY: Free Press.
4.
BallA.OwenD.GrayR. (2000). External transparency or internal capture? The role of third-party statements in adding value to corporate environmental reports. Business Strategy and the Environment, 9, 1-23.
5.
BarbierE. (1987). The concept of sustainable economic development. Environmental Conservation, 14, 101-110.
6.
BebbingtonJ. (2001). Sustainable development: A review of the international development business and accounting literature. Accounting Forum, 25, 128-157.
7.
BebbingtonJ.LarrinagaC. (2014). Accounting for sustainable development: An exploration. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39, 395-413.
8.
BebbingtonJ.ThomsonI. (1996). Business conceptions of sustainability and the implications for accountancy (Research Report No. 48). London, England: Chartered Association of Certified Accountants.
9.
BeckermanW. (1995). How would you like your “sustainability,” sir? Weak or strong? A reply to my critics. Environmental Values, 42, 167-179.
10.
BrownA. (2004). Authoritative sensemaking in a public inquiry report. Organization Studies, 25, 95-112.
11.
BrownJ. (2009). Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: Taking pluralism seriously. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20, 313-342.
12.
BrownJ.DillardJ. (2013). Agonizing over engagement: SEA and the “death of environmentalism” debates. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24, 1-18.
BrownL. (2003). Plan B: Rescuing a planet under stress and a civilization in trouble. New York, NY: Earth Policy Institute.
15.
BrunoK.KarlinerJ. (2002). Earthsummit.biz: The corporate takeover of sustainable development. Oakland, CA: Food First Books.
16.
BuhrN.ReiterS. (2006). Ideology, the environment and one worldview: A discourse analysis of Noranda’s environmental and sustainable development reports. Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, 3, 1-48.
17.
ButlerJ.LaclauE.ŽižekS. (2000). Contingency, hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left. London, England: Verso.
18.
ByrchC.KearinsK.MilneM.MorganR. (2007). Sustainable “what?” A cognitive approach to understanding sustainable development. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 4, 26-52.
19.
CleggS. (1989). Frameworks of power. London, England: Sage.
20.
CorreaC.LaineM. (2013). Struggling against like-minded conformity in order to enliven SEAR: A call for passion. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 33, 134-144.
21.
DillardJ.BrownJ. (2015). Broadening out and opening up: An agonistic attitude toward progressive social accounting, sustainability accounting. Management and Policy Journal, 6, 243-266.
22.
DobsonA. (1999). Fairness and futurity: Essays on environmental sustainability and social justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
EdenS. (1994). Using sustainable development: The business case. Global Environmental Change, 4, 160-167.
24.
EhrenfeldJ. (2004). Industrial ecology: A new field or only a metaphor. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12, 825-831.
25.
EhrenfeldJ.HoffmanA. (2013). Flourishing: A frank conversation about sustainability. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26.
ElkingtonJ. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford, England: Capstone.
27.
FosterJ. B.ClarkB.YorkR. (2010). Capitalism and the curse of energy efficiency: The return of the Jevons paradox. Monthly Review, 62(6), 1-14.
28.
FournierV. (2008). Escaping from the economy: The politics of degrowth. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 28, 528-545.
29.
GallhoferS.HaslamJ.YonekuraA. (2015). Accounting as differentiated universal for emancipatory praxis: Accounting delineation and mobilisation for emancipation(s) recognising democracy and difference. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28, 846-874.
30.
GerasN. (1987). Post-Marxism?New Left Review, 163, 40-82.
31.
GibsonK.GrayR.LaingY.DeyC. (2001, August). The silent accounts project: Draft silent and shadow accounts 1999-2000. Paper presented at BAA Scottish Group Conference, Stirling, Scotland.
32.
GladwinT. N.KennellyJ. J.KrauseT. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20, 874-907.
33.
GramsciA. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London, England: Lawrence & Wishart.
34.
GrayR. (2006). Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation? Whose value? Whose creation?Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19, 793-819.
35.
GrayR.BrennanA.MalpasJ. (2014). New accounts: Towards a reframing of social accounting. Accounting Forum, 38, 258-273.
36.
GrayR.MilneM. (2004). Towards reporting on the triple bottom line: Mirages, methods and myths. In HenriquesA.RichardsonJ. (Eds.), The triple bottom line: Does it all add up? (pp. 70-80). London, England: Earthscan.
37.
GreerJ.BrunoK. (1996). Greenwash: The reality behind corporate environmentalism. Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network.
38.
HahnT.FiggeF.Aragon-CorreaJ.SharmaS. (2017). Advancing research on corporate sustainability: Off to pastures new or back to the roots?Business & Society56, 155–185.
39.
HahnT.FiggeF.PinkseJ.PreussL. (2010). Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: You can’t have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19, 217-229.
40.
HamiltonC. (2004). Growth fetish. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
41.
HawkenP. (1993). The ecology of commerce: A declaration of sustainability. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
42.
HedigerW. (1999). Reconciling “weak” and “strong” sustainability. International Journal of Social Economics, 26, 1120-1143.
43.
HigginsC.WalkerR. (2012). Ethos, logos, pathos: Strategies of persuasion in social/environmental reports. Accounting Forum, 36, 194-208.
HowarthD.StavrakakisY. (2000). Introducing discourse theory and political analysis. In HowarthD.NorvalA.StavrakakisY. (Eds.), Discourse theory and political analysis: Identities, hegemonies, and social change (pp. 1-23). Manchester, UK: Manchester University.
46.
HukkinenJ. (1999). Institutions in environmental management: Constructing mental models and sustainability. London, England: Routledge.
International Institute for Sustainable Development. (2004). Available from http://www.iisd.org
49.
JacksonT. (2011). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. Oxon, UK: Earthscan.
50.
JacobsM. (1999). Sustainable development as a contested concept. In DobsonA. (Ed.), Fairness and futurity: Essays on environmental sustainability and social justice (pp. 21-45). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
51.
JensenD. (2008). How shall I live my life? On liberating the Earth from civilization. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
52.
JorgensenM.PhillipsL. (2002). Discourse Analysis as theory and method. London, England: Sage.
53.
KayaY.YokoboriK. (Eds.). (1997). Environment, energy, and economy: Strategies for sustainability. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University Press.
54.
KleinN. (2014). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
55.
LaclauE. (1988). Politics and the limits of modernity. In RossA. (Ed.), Universal abandon: The politics of postmodernism (pp. 63-82). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
56.
LaclauE. (1992). Universalism, particularism, and the question of identity. October, 61, 83-90.
57.
LaclauE. (1993). Discourse. In GoodwinR.PettitP. (Eds.), A companion to contemporary political philosophy (pp. 431-437). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
58.
LaclauE. (1994). Why do empty signifiers matter to politics? In WeeksJ. (Ed.), The lesser evil and the greater good: The theory and politics of social diversity. London, England: Rivers Oram Press.
59.
LaclauE. (1996). The death and resurrection of the theory of ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies, 1, 201-220.
60.
LaclauE. (2000). Identity and hegemony: The role of universality in the constitution of political logics. In ButlerJ.LaclauE.ŽižekS. (Eds.), Contingency, hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left (pp. 44-89). London, England: Verso.
61.
LaclauE.MouffeC. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (MooreW.CammackP., Trans.). London, England: Verso.
62.
LaclauE.MouffeC. (1987). Post-Marxism without apologies. New Left Review, 166, 79-106.
63.
LaclauE.MouffeC. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (2nd ed.). London, England: Verso.
64.
LaineM. (2005). Meanings of the term “sustainable development” in Finnish corporate disclosures. Accounting Forum, 29, 395-413.
65.
LaineM. (2009). Ensuring legitimacy through rhetorical changes? A longitudinal interpretation of the environmental disclosures of a leading Finnish chemical company. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22, 1029-1054.
66.
LaineM. (2010). Towards sustaining the status quo: Business talk of sustainability in Finnish corporate disclosures. European Accounting Review, 19, 247-274.
67.
Larrinaga-GonzalezC.BebbingtonJ. (2001). Accounting change or institutional appropriation?—A case study of implementation of environmental accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12, 269-292.
68.
LevyD. (1997). Environmental management as political sustainability. Organization & Environment, 10, 126-147.
69.
LinnenlueckeM.GriffithsA. (2013). The 2009 Victorian bushfires: A multilevel perspective on organizational risk and resilience. Organization & Environment, 26, 386-411.
70.
LiveseyS. (2002a). The discourse of the middle ground: Citizen Shell commits to sustainable development. Management Communication Quarterly, 15, 313-349.
71.
LiveseyS. (2002b). Global warming wars: Rhetorical and discourse analytic approaches to ExxonMobil’s corporate public discourse. Journal of Business Communication, 39, 117-148.
72.
LiveseyS.KearinsK. (2002). Transparent and caring corporations? A study of sustainability reports by The Body Shop and Royal Dutch/Shell. Organization & Environment, 15, 233-258.
73.
MakelaH.LaineM. (2011). A CEO with many messages: Comparing the ideological representations provided by different corporate reports. Accounting Forum, 35, 217-231.
74.
MarcusJ.KuruczE.ColbertB. (2010). Conceptions of the business-society-nature interface: Implications for management scholarship. Business & Society, 49, 402-438.
75.
MartinJ. (2002). The political logic of discourse: A neo-Gramscian view. History of European Ideas, 28, 21-31.
76.
McDonoughW.BraungartM. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York, NY: North Point Press.
77.
MedawarC. (1976). The social audit: A political view. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1, 389-394.
78.
MilneM. (1996). On sustainability; the environment and management accounting. Management Accounting Research, 7, 135-161.
79.
MilneM.GrayR. (2013). W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 13-29.
80.
MilneM.GrubnicS. (2011). Climate change accounting research: Keeping it interesting and different. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24, 948-977.
81.
MilneM.KearinsK.WaltonS. (2006). Creating adventures in wonderland: The journey metaphor and environmental sustainability. Organization, 13, 801-839.
82.
MilneM.TregidgaH.WaltonS. (2009). Words not actions! The ideological role of sustainable development reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22, 1211-1257.
MouffeC. (2000). The democratic paradox. London, England: Verso.
85.
MurtolaA. (2012). Materialist theology and anti-capitalist resistance, or, “what would Jesus buy?”Organization, 19, 325-344.
86.
NewtonT.HarteG. (1997). Green business: Technicist Kitsch. Journal of Management Studies, 34, 75-98.
87.
OlsenM. E.LodwickD. G.DunlapR. E. (1992). Viewing the world ecologically. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
88.
OrlitzkyM.SchmidtF.RynesS. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403-441.
89.
OrrD. (1991). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. New York: State University of New York Press.
90.
OttoB.BohmS. (2006). “The people” and resistance against international business: The case of the Bolivian “water war.”Critical Perspectives on International Business, 2, 299-320.
91.
OwenD. (2008). Chronicles of wasted time? A personal reflection on the current state of, and future prospects for, social and environmental accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21, 240-267.
PearceD.BarbierE. B.MarkandyaA. (1990). Sustainable development: Economics and environment in the third world. London, England: Earthscan.
94.
PolimeniJ. M.MayumiK.GiampietroM.AlcottB. (Eds.). (2008). The Jevons paradox and the myth of resource efficiency improvements. London, England: Earthscan.
95.
PrasadP.ElmesM. (2005). In the name of the practical: Unearthing the hegemony of pragmatics in the discourse of environmental management. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 845-867.
96.
PurserR.ParkC.MontuoriA. (1995). Limits to anthropocentrism: Toward an ecocentric organization paradigm?Academy of Management Review, 20, 1053-1089.
97.
RaupachM. R.MarlandG.CiaisP.Le QuéréC.CanadellJ. G.KlepperG.FieldC. B. (2007). Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 10288-10293.
98.
RedcliftM. (2005). Sustainable development (1987-2005): An oxymoron comes of age. Sustainable Development, 13, 212-227.
RoscoeP. (2014). I spend therefore I am: The true cost of economics. London, England: Penguin-Viking.
101.
SachsW. (1999). Sustainable development and the crisis of nature: On the political anatomy of an oxymoron. In FischerF.HajerM. (Eds.), Living with nature: Environmental politics as cultural discourse (pp. 23-41). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
102.
SandelM. J. (2012). What money can’t buy: The moral limits of markets. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
103.
SchmidheinyS. (1992). Changing course: A global business perspective on development and the environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
104.
SethiS. (1975). Dimensions of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 17, 58-64.
105.
ShearerT. (2002). Ethics and accountability: From the for-itself to the for-the-other. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 27, 541-573.
ShrivastavaP. (1995). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20, 936-960.
108.
SpenceC. (2007). Social and environmental reporting and hegemonic discourse. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20, 855-882.
109.
SpenceC.HusillosJ.Correa-RuizC. (2010). Cargo cult science and the death of politics: A critical review of social and environmental accounting research. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21, 76-89.
110.
SpenceC.ShenkinM. (2008). The rebirth of politics in Bolivia: The role of popular resistance to business. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 4, 344-366.
111.
SpicerA.BohmS. (2007). Moving management: Theorising struggles against the hegemony of management. Organization Studies, 28, 1667-1698.
112.
SpringettD. (2003). Business conceptions of sustainable development: A perspective from critical theory. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12, 71-86.
ThompsonJ. (1990). Ideology and modern culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
115.
ThomsonI. (2013). Punk rock, festival fringes and football fanzines: A future for social and environmental accounting research?Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 33, 145-148.
116.
ThomsonI. (2014). Responsible social accounting communities, symbolic activism and the reframing of social accounting. A commentary on new accounts: Towards a reframing of social accounting. Accounting Forum, 38, 274-277.
117.
ThomsonI.DeyC.RussellS. (2015). Activism, arenas and accounts in conflicts over tobacco control. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28, 809-845.
118.
TiltC. (1994). The influence of external pressure groups on corporate social disclosure: Some empirical evidence. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability, 7(4), 47-72.
119.
TorfingJ. (1999). New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
120.
TregidgaH.KearinsK.MilneM. (2013). The politics of knowing “organizational sustainable development.”Organization & Environment, 26, 102-129.
121.
TregidgaH.MilneM. (2006). From sustainable management to sustainable development: A longitudinal analysis of a leading New Zealand environmental reporter. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15, 219-241.
TurnerR. K. (1993). Sustainable environmental economics and management: Principles and practice. London, England: Belhaven.
124.
WackernagelM.ReesW. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth. Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Society.
125.
WackernagelM.SchulzN. B.DeumlingD.LinaresA. C.JenkinsM.KaposV.. . . RandersJ. (2002). Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 9266-9271.
