Backhaus, K.B., Stone, B.A., & Heiner, K. ( 2002). Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Business & Society, 41, 292-318.
2.
Getz, K.A. ( 2006). The effectiveness of global prohibition regimes: Corruption and the antibribery convention. Business & Society, 45, 254-281.
3.
Getz, K.A., & Volkema, R.J. ( 2001). Culture, perceived corruption, and economics: A model of predictors and outcomes. Business & Society, 40, 7-30.
4.
Gray, O.R. ( 1990). The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Revisited and amended . Business & Society, 29, 11-17.
5.
Greening, D.W., & Turban, D.B. ( 2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society , 39, 254-280.
6.
Lennerfors, T.T. ( 2009). The vicissitudes of corruption: Degeneration, transgression, jouissance. Business & Society, 48, 406-419.
7.
Luce, R.A., Barber, A.E., & Hillman, A.J. ( 2001). Good deeds and misdeeds: A mediated model of the effect of corporate social performance on organizational attractiveness. Business & Society, 40, 397-415.
8.
Stanberry, K., George, B.C., & Ross, M. ( 1991). Securities fraud in the international arena: Unilateral vs. multilateral enforcement of insider trading sanctions. Business & Society, 30, 27-36.
9.
Waldman, J. ( 1974). Overseas corruption of business-A philosophical perspective . Business & Society, 15, 12-17.
10.
Windsor, D., & Getz, K.A. ( 1999). Regional market integration and the development of global norms for enterprise conduct: The case of international bribery. Business & Society, 38, 415-449.
