Trade associations operate under the premise of advancing the shared interests of their member firms. How well do they fulfill this role? This article measures the activity of 148 major industry trade associations over time and relates this activity to the performance of the relevant industries and dominant firms within them. Findings suggest that trade association spending increases when the profitability of the four largest firms in an industry decreases, but spending is unrelated to the profitability of the industry overall. This implies that large firms exert control over trade association agendas and may use these communal organizations to advance their own interests rather than the shared interests of the entire industry. Moreover, it points to the need for further development of the currently anemic management literature on the activities of trade associations.
AldrichH.FiolC. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19, 645-671.
4.
AldrichH.StaberU. H. (1988). Organizing business interests: Patterns of trade association foundings, transformations, and deaths. In CarrollG. R. (Ed.), Ecological models of organizations (pp. 111-126). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
5.
AldrichH.StaberU. H.ZimmerC.BeggsJ. (1990). Minimalism and organizational mortality: Patterns of disbanding among U.S. trade association, 1900-1983. In SinghJ. V. (Ed.), Organizational evolution: New directions (pp. 21-52). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
AldrichH.ZimmerC.StaberU. H.BeggsJ. (1994). Minimalism, mutualism, and maturity: The evolution of American trade associations in the 20th century. In SinghJ.BaumJ. (Eds.), The evolutionary dynamics of organizations (pp. 223-239). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
AstleyW.FombrunC. (1983). Collective strategy: Social ecology of organizational environments. Academy of Management Review, 8, 576-587.
8.
BacharachS.LawlerE. (1981). Power and politics in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey Bass
9.
BaileyI.RuppS. (2006). The evolving role of trade associations in negotiated environment agreements: The case of United Kingdom climate change agreements. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15, 40-54.
10.
BarnettM. (2006a). Finding a working balance between competitive and communal strategy. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1753-1773.
11.
BarnettM. (2006b). Waves of collectivizing: A dynamic model of competition and cooperation over the life of an industry. Corporate Reputation Review, 8, 272-292.
BarnettM.KingA. (2008). Good fences make good neighbors: An institutional explanation of industry self-regulation. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 1150-1170.
14.
BarnettW.MischkeG.OcasioW. (2000). The evolution of collective strategies among organizations. Organization Studies, 21, 325-354.
BarringerB. R.HarrisonJ. S. (2000). Walking a tightrope: Creating value through interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management, 26, 367-403.
17.
Chemical Manufacturers Association Report. (1993). On the road to success (Responsible Care progress report). Washington, DC: Author.
18.
CollinsE.RoperJ. (2005). Strategic schizophrenia: The strategic use of trade associations in New Zealand. Journal of Communication Management, 9, 256-266.
19.
DavisG.ThompsonT. (1994). A social movement perspective on corporate control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 141-173.
20.
DiMaggioP. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In ZuckerL. (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations (pp. 3-22). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
21.
DiMaggioP.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
22.
DuttonJ.WebsterJ. (1988). Patterns of interest around issues: The role of uncertainty and feasibility. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 663-675.
23.
FerrierW.SmithK.GrimmC. (1999). The role of competitive actions in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 372-388.
24.
FreemanR. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
25.
GalaskiewiczJ. (1985). Interorganizational relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 281-304.
26.
GunninghamN. (1995). Environment, self-regulation, and the chemical industry: Assessing Responsible Care. Law & Policy, 17, 59-109.
27.
GuptaA.LadL. (1983). Industry self-regulation: An economic, organizational, and political analysis. Academy of Management Review, 8, 416-425.
28.
HallidayT.PowellM.GranforsM. (1987). Minimalist organizations: Vital events in state bar associations, 1870-1930. American Sociological Review, 52, 456-471.
29.
HardinG. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
30.
HemphillT. (1992). Self-regulating industry behavior: Antitrust limitations and trade association codes of conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 915-920.
31.
HillmanA.HittM. (1999). Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Academy of Management Review, 24, 825-842.
32.
HirschP. (1975). Organizational effectiveness and the institutional environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 327-344.
33.
HoffmanA. (1997). From heresy to dogma: An institutional history of corporate environmentalism. San Francisco: New Lexington Press.
34.
IngramP.InmanC. (1996). Institutions, intergroup rivalry, and the evolution of hotel populations around Niagara Falls. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 629-658.
35.
HoffmanA.OcasioW. (2001). Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-rangetheory of industry attention to external events. Organization Science, 12, 414-434.
36.
KingA.LenoxM.BarnettM. (2002). Strategic responses to the reputation commons problem. In HoffmanA.VentrescaM. (Eds.), Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives (pp. 393-406). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
37.
LaneC.BachmannR. (1997). Cooperation in inter-firm relations in Britain and Germany: The role of social institutions. British Journal of Sociology, 48, 226-254.
38.
LenoxM.NashJ. (2003). Industry self-regulation and adverse selection: A comparison across four trade association programs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12, 343-356.
39.
LenwayS.RehbeinK. (1991). Leaders, followers, and free riders: An empirical test of variation in corporate political involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 893-905.
40.
LuriaM. (2005). Trade associations face important patent/antitrust issues. Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, 17, 13-19.
41.
MaitlandI. (1985). The limits of business self-regulation. California Management Review, 27, 132-147.
42.
MarchJ. G.OlsenJ. P. (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
43.
McCarthyJ.ZaldM. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212-1241.
44.
McWilliamsA.Van FleetD.CoryK. (2002). Raising rivals’ costs through political strategy: An extension of resource-based theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 707-723.
45.
MilesR. H. (1982). Coffin nails and corporate strategies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
46.
OliverC. (1990). Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integrations and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 15, 241-265.
47.
OlsonM. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
OstromE. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
PhillipsN.LawrenceT.HardyC. (2000). Inter-organizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 23-43.
50.
PrakashA.PotoskiM. (2006). The voluntary environmentalists: Green clubs, ISO 14001, and voluntary environmental regulations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51.
ReesJ. (1994). Hostages of each other: The transformation of nuclear safety since Three Mile Island. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52.
ReesJ. (1997). The development of communitarian regulation in the chemical industry. Law & Policy, 19, 477-528.
53.
RousseeuwP. JLeroyA. M.(1987). Robust regression and outlier detection. New York: Wiley.
54.
SalopS.ScheffmanD. (1983). Raising rivals’ costs. American Economic Review, 73, 267-271
55.
SchmitterP.StreeckW. (1981). The organization of business interests (IIM/LMP 81-13). Berlin, Germany: International Institute of Management, Labour Market Policy Group.
56.
SchulerD. (1996). Corporate political strategy and foreign competition: The case of the steel industry. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 720-737.
57.
StaberU. (1987). Corporatism and the governance structure of American trade associations. Political Studies, 35, 278-288.
58.
StaberU.AldrichH. (1983). Trade association stability and public policy. In HallR.QuinnR. (Eds.), Organizational theory and public policy (pp. 163-178). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
59.
SwartoutK. (Ed.). (2008). Encyclopedia of associations: National organizations of the U.S. (46th ed.). Detroit, MI: Gale Research Co.
60.
UseemM. (1984). The inner circle: Large corporations and the rise of business political activity in the U.S. and U.K. New York: Oxford University Press.
61.
Van WaardenF. (1992). Emergence and development of business interest associations: An example from the Netherlands. Organization Studies, 13, 521-562.
62.
WilliamsonO. (1968). Wage rates as a barrier to entry: The Pennington case in perspective. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 85, 85-116.
