This article investigates corporate governance reform in South Africa in the context of the country’s international links with Anglo-American corporate governance and domestic pursuit of socioeconomic development. Two key questions are evaluated. (a) How has divergence within the Anglo-American model influenced corporate governance reform in South Africa? (b) Can South Africa’s historical closeness to the Anglo-American model be combined with increasing attention to stakeholder issues to produce a hybrid “African model” of corporate governance? Evaluating these questions, the following issues are explored in turn: the contrast between shareholder and stakeholder models, divergence between U.S. and U.K. approaches to corporate governance as exemplified by Sarbanes-Oxley, locating a South African approach in context of the Anglo-American model, the King reports and an emerging “African” model of corporate governance, and the role of international and domestic factors in shaping South Africa’s ongoing reform process.
AguileraR. V.JacksonG. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447-465.
2.
AguileraR. V.WilliamsC. A.ConleyJ. M.RuppD. E. (2006). Corporate governance and social responsibility: A comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(3), 147-158.
3.
AlbertM. (1993). Capitalism against capitalism. London: Whurr.
4.
AllenF.GaleD. (2000). Comparing financial systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
ArmstrongP.SegalN.DavisB. (2005). Corporate governance: South Africa, a pioneer in Africa (Global Best Practice Report No. 1). Johannesburg: South African Institute of International Affairs.
6.
BassettC. (2008). South Africa: Revisiting capital’s “formative action.”Review of African Political Economy, 35(2), 185-202.
7.
BondP. (2000). Elite transition: From apartheid to neoliberalism in South Africa. London: Pluto.
8.
BongmaE. K. (2004). Reflections on Thabo Mbeki’s African Renaissance. Journal of Southern African Studies, 30(2), 291-316.
9.
BushT. (2005). “Divided by common language”: Where economics meets the law: US versus non-US financial reporting models. London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales.
10.
CarterM. (2006). America’s capital markets: Maintaining our lead in the 21st century (House Committee on Financial Services, Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government Sponsored Enterprises, 109th Congress, 2nd session, April 26). Retrieved September 14, 2008, from http://www.nyse.com/about/nyseviewpoint/1207132757675.html
11.
CliftB. (2007). French corporate governance in the new global economy: Mechanisms of change and hybridisation within models of capitalism. Political Studies, 55(3), 546-567.
12.
ColeM. (2007). The Seventh Annual A. A. Sommer, Jr. Lecture on Corporate, Securities and Financial Law. “The U.K. FSA: Nobody Does It Better?”Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 12(2), 259-283.
DetomasiD. A. (2006). International regimes: The case of Western corporate governance. International Studies Review, 8(2), 225-251.
18.
DoidgeC.KarolyiA. G.StulzR. (2007). Has New York become less competitive in global markets? Evaluating foreign listing choices over time (National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 13079). Retrieved September 14, 2008, from http://papers.nber.org/papers/w13079
19.
DonaldsonT.PrestonL. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
20.
DoreR. (2000). Stock market capitalism: Welfare capitalism—Japan and Germany versus the Anglo-Saxons. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
GourevitchP. A.ShinnJ. J. (2005). Political power and corporate control: The new global politics of corporate governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
GuglerK.MuellerD. C.YurtogluB. B. (2004). Corporate governance and globalization. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20(1), 129-156.
27.
HallP. A.SoskiceD. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
28.
HM Treasury. (2006a). Check against delivery (Speech by Economic Secretary to the Treasury, Ed Balls MP to the British Bankers Association, October 11). Retrieved February 3, 2009, from http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/speech_est_111006.htm
29.
HM Treasury. (2006b). Financial services: A UK perspective (Speech by Economic Secretary to the Treasury, Ed Balls MP, at the Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce and the British Chamber of Commerce, September 13). Retrieved February 3, 2009, from http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/speech_est_130906.htm
KaganR. A. (2001). Adversarial legalism: The American way of law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
KarstenL.IllaH. (2005). Ubuntu as a key African management concept: Contextual background and practical insights for knowledge application. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(7), 607-620.
KelemenR. D.SibbittE. C. (2004). The globalization of American law. International Organization, 58(1), 103-136.
38.
KingM. (2006). The corporate citizen: Corporate governance for all entities. Johannesburg, South Africa: Penguin.
39.
KoelbleT. A.LiPumaE. (2006). The effects of circulatory capitalism on democratization: Observations from South Africa and Brazil. Democratization, 13(4), 605-631.
40.
La PortaR.Lopes-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471-517.
41.
La PortaR.Lopes-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA.VishnyR. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113-1155.
42.
La PortaR.Lopes-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA.VishnyR. W. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 3-27.
43.
LetzaS.SunX.KirkbrideJ. (2004). Shareholding versus stakeholding: A critical review of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 242-262.
44.
LützS. (2004). Convergence within national diversity: The regulatory state in finance. Journal of Public Policy, 24(2), 169-197.
45.
MalokaE. T. (2001). The South African “African Renaissance” debate, a critique. Polis RCSP CRSP, 8(Numéro Special), 1-10.
46.
MbekiT. (1998). Statement of Deputy President Thabo Mbeki at the opening of the debate in the National Assembly, on “reconciliation and nation building” (National Assembly, Cape Town, May 29). Retrieved September 13, 2008, from http://www.dfa.gov.za/docs/speeches/1998/mbek0529.htm
MhoneG. (2003). Democratisation, economic liberalisation and the quest for sustainable development in South Africa. In MhoneG.EdighejiO. (Eds.), Governance in the new South Africa: The challenges of globalisation (pp. 18-68). Lansdowne, South Africa: University of Cape Town Press.
50.
MhoneG.EdighejiO. (Eds.). (2003). Governance in the new South Africa: The challenges of globalisation. Lansdowne, South Africa: University of Cape Town Press.
51.
MorganG.QuackS. (2005). Institutional legacies and firm dynamics: The growth and internationalization of UK and German law firms. Organization Studies, 26(12), 1765-1785.
52.
NaidooR. (2002). Corporate governance: An essential guide for South African companies. Cape Town, South Africa: Double Story Books.
53.
O’BrienJ. (2005). The politics of symbolism: Sarbanes-Oxley and the dynamics of financial governance (Regulatory Regime Change in World Financial Markets Working Paper). Belfast, UK: Queen’s University Belfast.
54.
Painter-MorlandM. (2006). Triple bottom-line reporting as social grammar: Integrating corporate social responsibility and corporate codes of conduct. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 352-364.
PrinslooE. D. (1998). Ubuntu culture and participatory management. In CoetzeeP. H.RouxA. P. J. (Eds.), The African philosophy reader (pp. 41-51). London: Routledge.
59.
ReedD. (2002). Corporate governance reforms in developing countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 37, 223-247.
60.
RibsteinL. E.ButlerH. N. (2006). The Sarbanes-Oxley debacle: What we’ve learned; how to fix it. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
61.
RoeM. J. (2003). Political determinants of corporate governance: Political context, corporate impact. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
62.
RomanoR. (2005). The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the making of quack corporate governance. Yale Law Journal, 114(7), 1521-1611.
63.
RosserA. (2003). Coalitions, convergence and corporate governance reform in Indonesia. Third World Quarterly, 24(2), 319-338.
64.
RossouwG. J. (2005). Business ethics and corporate governance in Africa. Business & Society, 44(1), 94-106.
65.
RossouwG. J.van der WattA.MalanD. P. (2002). Corporate governance in South Africa. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(3), 289-302.
66.
SarraJ. P. (2004). Strengthening domestic corporate activity in global capital markets: A Canadian perspective on South Africa’s corporate governance (George Washington University Law School, Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper 118). Retrieved March 27, 2007, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=628702
67.
SchlemmerL. (2004). Business in change: Corporate citizenship in South Africa (Occasional Paper 2). Johannesburg: South Africa Foundation.
68.
SchwabK. (2003). Foreword. In CorneliusP. K.KogutB. (Eds.), Corporate governance and capital flows in a global economy (pp. ix-xvi). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
69.
SoederbergS. (2004). The politics of the new international financial architecture: Reimposing neoliberal domination in the global south. London: Zed Books.
70.
SyA.TinkerT. (2008). Sarbanes-Oxley: An endangered specie?Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19, 927-930.
71.
TaylorS. D. (2007). Business and the state in southern Africa: The politics of economic reform. London: Lynne Rienner.
72.
TomsS.WrightM. (2005). Divergence and convergence within Anglo-American corporate governance systems: Evidence from the US and UK, 1950–2000. Business History, 47(2), 267-295.
73.
U.S. Department of the Treasury. (2006). Remarks by Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson on the competitiveness of U.S. Capital Markets Economic Club of New York. Retrieved March 27, 2007, from http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/hp174.htm
74.
ValeP.MasekoS. (1998). South Africa and the African Renaissance. International Affairs, 74(2), 271-287.
75.
van KesselI. (2001). In search of an African Renaissance: An agenda for modernisation, neo-traditionalism or Africanisation?Quest: An African Journal of Philosophy, 15(1-2), 43-52.
76.
VaughnM.RyanL. V. (2006). Corporate governance in South Africa: A bellwether for the continent?Corporate Governance, 14(5), 504-512.
77.
VogelS. (1996). Freer markets, more rules. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
78.
WestA. (2006). Theorising South Africa’s corporate governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 68, 433-448.
79.
WielandJ. (2005). Corporate governance, values management, and standards: A European perspective. Business & Society, 44(1), 74-93.
80.
WilliamsC.ConleyJ. (2005). An emerging third way? The erosion of the Anglo-American shareholder value construct. Cornell International Law Journal, 38(2), 493-551.
