The stakeholder view of the firm has been justified under instrumental and normative bases. Whereas the instrumental basis argues that “enlightened stakeholder management” is a necessary precondition to seek shareholders’ value maximization, the normative basis relies on the observance of ethical norms by managers and the notion that the stakeholders should be treated as “ends.” Some scholars argue that both views actually converge. However, this article provides empirical evidence of the negative effects of stakeholder management in shareholders’ value in the short run and the positive effects over the long run, using a longitudinal database of 658 U.S. firms. Given the difficulties of anticipating the instrumental long-term financial effects of short-run decisions affecting the different stakeholders, the authors’ findings support the view of the normative basis for stakeholder theory based on ethics, norms, and heuristic criteria as a way to solve conflicts among the claims of different stakeholders.
Agle, B.R., Mitchell, R.K., & Sonnenfeld, J.A. (1999). Who matters to CEOS? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507-525.
2.
Alexander, G.J., & Buchholz, R.A. (1978). Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. Academy of Management Journal , 21(3), 479-486.
3.
Argandoña, A. ( 1998). The Stakeholder Theory and the Common Good. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(9/10), 1093-1102.
4.
Asher, C., Mahoney, J., & Mahoney, J. ( 2005). Towards a property rights foundation for a stakeholder theory of the firm. Journal of Management & Governance , 9(1), 5-32.
5.
Aupperle, K.E., Carroll, A.B., & Hatfield, John D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability . Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446-463.
6.
Berman, S.L., Wicks, A.C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T.M. ( 1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and the firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488-506.
7.
Blair, M.M. ( 1995). Ownership and control: Rethinking corporate governance for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution
8.
Clarkson, M.B.E. ( 1994). A risk based model of stakeholder theory. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto, Centre for Corporate Social Performance & Ethics.
9.
Cochran, P.L., & Wood, R.A. ( 1984). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance . Academy of Management Journal, 27, 42-56.
10.
Coffey, B.S., & Fryxell, G.E. ( 1991). Institutional ownership of stock and dimensions of corporate social performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(6), 437-444.
11.
Coombs, J.E., & Gilley, K.M. ( 2005). Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: Main effects and interactions with financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 827-840.
12.
Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T.W. ( 1999). Ties that bind. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
13.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L.E. ( 1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
14.
Evan, W., & Freeman, R.E. ( 1983). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. Beauchamp & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (pp. 75-93). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15.
Fernández, P. ( 2002). Valuation methods and shareholder value creation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Freeman, R.E. ( 1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions . Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 409-422.
18.
Frey, B., & Osterloh, M. ( 2005). Yes, managers should be paid like bureaucrats. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(1), 96-111.
19.
Garcia-Castro, R., Canela, M.A., & Ariño, M.A. (2007). Does social performance really lead to financial performance?Accounting for endogeneity (Working paper). Barcelona, Spain: IESE Business School.
20.
Goodpaster, K. ( 1991). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1, 53-73.
21.
Grandori, A. ( 2004). Corporate governance and firm organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Graves, S., & Waddock, S.A. ( 2000). Beyond built to last . . . stakeholder relations in "built-to-last" companies. Business and Society Review, 105(4), 393-418.
23.
Griffin, J.J., & Mahon, J.F. ( 1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate. Business & Society, 36(1), 5-31.
24.
Hamilton, B.H., & Nickerson, J.A. (2003). Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organization, 1(1), 51-78.
25.
Hayes, R., & Abernathy, W.J. (1980). Managing our way to economic decline. Harvard Business Review, 58(4), 67-78.
26.
Hill, C.W.L., & Jones, T.M. ( 1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131-154.
27.
Hillman, A.J., & Keim, G.D. ( 2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line?Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125-139.
28.
Huselid, M.A. ( 1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635-672.
29.
Jacoby, S.M. ( 2005). The embedded corporation. New Jersey : Princeton University Press.
30.
Jensen, M.C. ( 2000). Value maximization and the corporate objective function . In M. Beer & N. Nohria (Eds.), Breaking the code of change (pp. 37-58). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
31.
Jones, T.M. ( 1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404-437.
32.
Jones, T.M., & Wicks, A.C. ( 1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 206-221.
33.
Letza, S., Sun, x., & Kirkbride, J. ( 2004). Shareholding versus stakeholding: A critical review of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 242-262
34.
Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. ( 2001). People and profits?Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35.
Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. ( 2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268-305.
36.
McGuire, J.B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal , 31, 854-872.
37.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. ( 2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal , 21, 603-609.
38.
Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., & Wood, D.J. ( 1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
39.
Moskowitz, M. ( 1972). Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society Review, 1, 71-75.
40.
Ogden, S., & Watson, R. ( 1999). Corporate performance and stakeholder management: Balancing shareholder and customer interests in the U.K. privatized water industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 526-538.
41.
Orlitzky M., Schmidt F., & Rynes S. ( 2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis . Organization Studies, 24, 403-441.
42.
Pava, M., & Krausz J. ( 1996). The association between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 321-357.
43.
Pfeffer, J. ( 2005). Working alone: What ever happen to the idea of organizations as communities? (Stanford GSB Research Paper No. 1906). Retrieved February 12, 2008, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=804544.
44.
Phillips, R. ( 2003). Stakeholder legitimacy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1), 25-41.
45.
Phillips, R., Freeman, R.E., & Wicks, A.C. ( 2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479-502.
46.
Post, J.E., Preston, L.E. & Sachs S. ( 2002). Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
47.
Prahalad, C.K. ( 1997). Corporate governance or corporate value added? Rethinking the primacy of shareholder value. In D. Chew (Ed.), Studies in international corporate finance and governance systems (pp. 46-56). New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
Preston, L.E., & Post, J.E. ( 1975). Measuring corporate responsibility. Journal of General Management, 2(3), 45-52.
49.
Reichheld, F.R. ( 1996). The loyalty effect. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
50.
Roman, R., Hayibor, S., & Agle B.R. ( 1999). The relationship between social and financial performance . Business & Society, 38(1), 109-125.
51.
Senge, P. ( 2000). The puzzles and paradoxes of how living companies create wealth. In M. Beer & N. Nohria N. (Eds.), Breaking the code of change (pp. 59-82). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
52.
Stern Stewart. ( 1996). The Stern Stewart Performance 1000. New York: Stern Stewart Management Services.
53.
Tobin, J., & Brainard, W. ( 1968). Pitfalls in financial model building. American Economic Review, 58, 99-122.
54.
Ullmann A.A. ( 1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540-557.
55.
Waddock, S.A., & Graves, S.B. ( 1997a). The corporate social performance - financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.
56.
Waddock, S.A., & Graves, S.B. ( 1997b). Quality of management and quality of stakeholder relations: Are they synonymous? Business & Society, 36(3), 250-279.
57.
Wiggins, R.R., & Rueffli, T.W. ( 2002). Sustained competitive advantage: temporal dynamics and the incidence and persistence of superior economic performance. Organization Science, 13, 82-105.
