The study examined whether there are systematic differences in the economic impacts of different corporate responsibility issues and found that the content of corporate responsibility does have an effect on economic impact. Economic impacts were more positive for corporate responsibility issues that reduce negative externalities than for those that generate positive externalities and more positive as well as for issues whose outcome benefits market stakeholders rather than nonmarket stakeholders.
Berman, S.L., Wicks, A.C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T.M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488-506.
2.
Blackburn, V.L., Doran, M., & Shrader, C.B. (1994). Investigating the dimensions of social responsibility and the consequences for corporate financial performance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 6(2), 195-212.
3.
Christmann, P. (2004). Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy standardization. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 747-760.
4.
Creyer, E.H., & Ross, W.T. (1996). The impact of corporate behavior on perceived product value. Marketing Letters, 7(2), 173-185.
5.
Diltz, J.D. (1995). The private cost of socially responsible investing . Applied Financial Economics, 5, 69-77.
6.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.
7.
Epstein, M.J., & Schnietz, K.E. (2002). Measuring the cost of environmental and labor protests to globalization: An event study of the failed 1999 Seattle WTO talks. International Trade Journal, 16(2), 129-160.
8.
Folkes, V., & Kamins, M. (1999). Effects of information about firms' ethical and unethical actions on consumers' attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 243-259.
9.
Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman/Ballinger.
10.
Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, pp. 32-33, 122, 124, 126.
11.
Gilley, K.M., Worrell, D.L., Davidson, W.N., & El-Jelly, A. (2000). Corporate environmental initiatives and anticipated firm performance: The differential effects of process-driven versus product-driven greening initiatives. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1199-1216.
12.
Griffin, J.J., & Mahon, J.F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36(1), 5-31.
13.
Hambrick, D.C., Geletkanycz, M.A., & Fredrickson, J.W. (1993). Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 401-418.
14.
Hillman, A.J., & Keim, G.D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125-139.
15.
Hoffman, A.J., & Ventresca, M.J. (1999). The institutional framing of policy debates: Economics versus the environment. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 1368-1392.
16.
Husted, B. (2000). A contingency theory of corporate social performance . Business & Society, 39, 24-48.
17.
Jones, M.T. (2005). The transnational corporation, corporate social responsibility and the "outsourcing" debate. Journal of American Academy of Business, 6(2), 91-97.
18.
Jones, T.M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366-395.
19.
Jones, T.M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404-437.
20.
Karagozoglu, N., & Lindell, M. (2000). Environmental management: Testing the win-win model. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(6), 817-829.
21.
Lankoski, L. (2000). Determinants of environmental profit: An analysis of the firm-level relationship between environmental performance and economic performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Helsinki University of Technology, Institute of Strategy and International Business (Doctoral Dissertations 2000/1) . Retrieved March 22, 2006, from http://lib.tkk.fi/Diss/2000/isbn9512280574/
22.
Lankoski, L. (2006). Environmental and economic performance: The basic links. In S. Schaltegger & W. Wagner (Eds.), Managing the business case for sustainability: The integration of social, environmental and economic performance (pp. 32-46). Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf.
23.
Margolish, J.D., & Walsh, J.P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268-305.
24.
Mattingly, J.E., & Berman, S.L. (2006). Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini Ratings Data. Business & Society, 45(1), 20-46.
25.
Meijer, M.-M., & Schuyt, T. (2005). Corporate social performance as a bottom line for consumers. Business & Society, 44(4), 442-461.
26.
Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., & Wood, D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
27.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., & Rynes, S.L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.
28.
Pava, M.L., & Krausz, J. (1996). The association between corporate social-responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3), 321-357.
29.
Porter, M.E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment- competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
30.
Rennings, K., Schröder, M., & Ziegler, A. (2003). The economic performance of European stock corporations: Does sustainability matter? Greener Management International , 44, 33-43.
31.
Rowley, T., & Berman, S. (2000). A brand new brand of corporate social performance . Business and Society, 39, 397-418.
32.
Smircich, L., & Stubbart, C. (1985). Strategic management in an enacted world. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 724-736.
33.
Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics, 1, 80-83.
34.
Wood, D.J., & Jones, R.E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3, 229-267.
35.
Zahra, S.A., & LaTour, M.S. (1987). Corporate social responsibility and organizational effectiveness: A multivariate approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 459-467.
