Although it is widely accepted that corporate reputation influences organization-stakeholder interactions, there is no theoretical framework that conceptualizes this aspect in stakeholders' decision-making processes for establishing various forms of relationships with a firm. By adopting an interdisciplinary approach, this article provides a theoretical model that explains the role corporate reputation has in the process through which stakeholders decide to establish relationships with a firm. It is argued that the stakeholder decision-making process for exchange with a company is based on several exchange rules: corporate reputation, social legitimacy, pragmatic legitimacy, and exchange benefits. The article concludes with a case study of James Hardie Industries in Australia, which illustrates the function of the proposed conceptual model.
Abbott, R. (2000, September 5). Court told James Hardie knew asbestos was dangerous in 60's. Australian Associated Press.
2.
Aldrich, H.E., & Fiol, C.M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645-670.
3.
Alessandri, S.W. (2001). Modelling corporate identity: A concept explication and theoretical explanation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 6(4), 173-182.
4.
Aristotle. (1976). The ethics of Aristotle. The nicomachen ethics (J. A. K. Thomson, Trans.) . New York: Penguin.
5.
Arnold, S.J., Handelman, J.M., & Tigert, D.J. (1996). Organizational legitimacy and retail store patronage . Journal of Business Research, 35(3), 229-239.
6.
Ashforth, B.E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
7.
Balmer, J.M.T., & Gray, E.R. (1999). Corporate identity and corporate communications: Creating competitive advantage. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 4(4), 171-176.
8.
Bennett, R., & Gabriel, H. (2001). Reputation, trust and supplier commitment: The case of shipping company/seaport relations. The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 16(6), 424-438.
9.
Bottomley, G. (1997, April 1). Identification: Ethnicity, gender and culture. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 18, 41-48.
10.
Bromley, D.B. (2001). Relationships between personal and corporate reputation . European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4), 316-334.
11.
Brown, T.J., & Dacin, P.A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68.
12.
Cable, D.M., & Graham, M.E. (2000). The determinants of job seekers' reputation perceptions . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(8), 929-947.
Caruana, A. (1997). Corporate reputation: Concept and measurement . Journal of Product and Brand Management, 6(2), 109-118.
15.
Christensen, L.T., & Askegaard, S. (2001). Corporate identity and corporate image revisited; A semiotic perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4), 292-315.
16.
Cornelissen, J. (2000). Corporate image: An audience centred model. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 5(2), 119-125.
17.
Deephouse, D.D. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1091-1112.
18.
Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, F. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-136.
19.
Driscoll, C., & Crombie, A. (2001). Stakeholder legitimacy management and the qualified good neighbor: The case of Nova Nada and JDI. Business & Society, 40(4), 442-471.
20.
Dutton, E.J., Dukerih, M.J., & Harquail, V.C. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239-263.
21.
Erikson, E.H. (1963). Childhood and society (rev. ed.). New York: Norton.
22.
Fombrun, C.J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
23.
Fombrun, C., Gardberg, N.A., & Sever, J. (2000). The reputation quotient: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. The Journal of Brand Management, 7(4), 241-255.
24.
Fombrun, C.J., & Rindova, P.V. (1996). Who's tops and who decides? The social construction of corporate reputations. New York: New York University, Stern School of Business.
25.
Fombrun, C.J., & Van Riel, C.B.M. (1997). The reputational landscape . Corporate Reputation Review, 1(1/2), 5-13.
26.
Forgeron, A. (2002, December 6). Crazy for you . . . still. National Post, p. 6.
27.
Friedman, M. (1982). Capitalism and freedom (reissue ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Gosnell, P. (2004, December 22). Victim power-James Hardie in $1.9bn asbestos deal. Daily Telegraph, p. 5.
29.
Gotsi, M., & Wilson, A. (2001). Corporate reputation management: "Living the brand ." Management Decision, 39(2), 99-104.
30.
Gray, E.R., & Balmer, J.M.T. (1998). Managing corporate image and corporate reputation. Long Range Planning, 31(5), 695-702.
31.
Groenland, E.A.G. (2002). Qualitative research to validate the RQ-dimensions . Corporate Reputation Review, 4(4), 308-315.
32.
Handelman, J.M., & Arnold, S.J. (1999). The role of marketing actions with a social dimension: Appeals to the institutional environment. Journal of Marketing , 63, 33-48.
33.
Hart, R. (2002, July 22). Living larger; Volkswagen's luxury flagship Phaeton takes the company to new heights. Auto Week, p. 14.
34.
Herbig, P., & Milewicz, J. (1995). To be or not to be . . . credible that is: A model of reputation and credibility among competing firms. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 13(6), 24-33.
35.
Hills, B. (2005). The James Hardie story: Asbestos victims' claims evaded by manufacturer. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 11(2), 212-214.
36.
Hinings, B., & Greenwood, R. (1988). The normative prescription of organizations. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations. Culture and environment (pp. 53-70). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
37.
Hovland, C.I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 633-650.
38.
James Hardie boycott called. (2004, November 8). SBS 6.30pm TV World News Transcripts.
39.
Jobson. (2000, March 1). Jobson's yearbook of public companies-James Hardie Industries Ltd . Melbourne, Australia: Dun & Bradstreet.
40.
Jones, G.H., Jones, B.H., & Little, P. (2000). Reputation as reservoir: Buffering against loss in times of economic crisis. Corporate Reputation Review, 3(1), 21-29.
41.
Kazoleas, D., Kim, Y., & Moffitt, M.A. (2001). Institutional image: A case study. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 6(4), 205-216.
42.
Kollock, P. (1994). The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. The American Journal of Sociology, 100(2), 313-333.
43.
Landon, S., & Smith, C.E. (1997). The use of quality and reputation indicators by consumers: The case of Bordeaux wine. Journal of Consumer Policy, 20(3), 289-323.
44.
Lantos, G.P. (2002). The ethicality of altruistic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 19(3), 205-230.
45.
Mahne, C. (2004, December 1). Building giant caught in asbestos row. Retrieved August 25, 2006, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/business/4058007.stm
46.
Marziliano, N. (1998). Managing the corporate image and identity: A borderline between fiction and reality. International Studies of Management & Organization, 28(3), 3-11.
47.
Maurer, J.D. (1971). Readings in organizational theory: Open system approaches. New York: Random House .
48.
McAlister, D.T., & Ferrell, L. (2002). The role of strategic philanthropy in marketing strategy. European Journal of Marketing, 36(5-6), 689-705.
49.
Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., & Wood, D.J. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
50.
Payne, J.W., Bettman, J., & Johnston, E. (1993). The adaptive decision-maker. New York: Cambridge University Press.
51.
Poole, R. (1999). Nation and identity. London : Routledge.
52.
Powell, W.W. (1991). Expanding the scope of institutional analysis . In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 183-203). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
Rennie, P. (1988, April 8). James Hardie divides to conquer. Business Review Weekly, p. 123.
54.
Savage, G.T., Nix, T.H., Whitehead, C.J., & Blair, J.D. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 5, 61-75.
55.
Schweizer, T.S., & Wijnberg, N.M. (1999). Transferring reputation to the corporation in different cultures: Individuals, collectives, systems and strategic management of corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 2(3), 249-266.
56.
Scott, W.R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57.
Shenkar, O., & Yuchtman-Yaar, E. (1997). Reputation, image, prestige, and goodwill: An interdisciplinary approach to organisational standing. Human Relations, 50(11), 1361-1381.
58.
Smith, A.D. (1991). National identity. London: Penguin.
59.
Smith, N.C., & Quelch, J.A. (1993). Ethics in marketing. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
60.
Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
61.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior . In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall .
62.
Towers, K. (2000, December 2). Asbestos award: The first of many . Australian Financial Review, p. 6.
63.
Turner, J.C. (1985). Social categorisation and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behaviour. In L. E. J. (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 2, pp. 77-122). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
64.
Van Riel, C.B.M. (1995). Principles of corporate communication. London: Prentice Hall.
65.
Vendelo, M.T. (1998). Narrating corporate reputation. International Studies of Management & Organization, 28(3), 120-137.
66.
Wartick, S.L. (1992). The relationship between intense media exposure and change in corporate reputation. Business & Society , 31, 33-49.
67.
Wartick, S.L. (2002). Measuring corporate reputation: Definition and data. Business & Society, 41(4), 271-192.
68.
Webb, T. (2002, February 17). Body Shop scents to spread across UK. The Business, p. 4.
69.
Weigelt, K., & Camerer, C. (1988). Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory and applications. Strategic Management Journal , 9, 443-454.
70.
Wilson, E.J., & Woodside, A.G. (2001). Executive and consumer decision processes: Increasing useful sensemaking by identifying similarities and departures. The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing , 16(5), 401-414.
71.
Winn, M.I. (2001). Building stakeholder theory with a decision modeling methodology. Business & Society, 40(2), 133-166.
72.
Zarkada-Fraser, A. (1999, November-December). The relationship between market orientation, good corporate citizenship and customer loyalty. Paper presented at the Australia New Zealand Marketing Academy , Sydney.
73.
Zarkada-Fraser, A. (2001). Stereotyping in international business. In C. L. Cooper, S. Cartwright, & P. C. Earley (Eds.), The international handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. 391-406). London: Wiley.
74.
Zarkada-Fraser, A., & Fraser, C. (2000, May). Integrating social and economic orientated marketing: A study of retail management. Paper presented at the Academy of Marketing Science Annual Conference, Montreal , Quebec, Canada.
75.
Zucker, L.G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840-1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53-111.
