This study examines the relationship between pension fund ownership of companies and corporate social performance using a unique database of more than 500 publicly listed U.K. companies. The empirical analysis emphasizes the heterogeneous character of pension fund holdings and the multidimensional nature of corporate social performance. The results highlight that the characteristics of pension fund management are significant drivers of preferences for social performance and that employee-related aspects of social performance are preferred by pension funds.
Adams, M., & Hardwick, P. (1998). An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 35, 641-654.
2.
Alexander, G.J., & Buchhholz, R.A. (1978). Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. Academy of Management Journal , 21, 479-486.
3.
Badrinath, S.G., Gay, G.D., & Kale, J.R. (1989). Patterns of institutional investment, prudence, and the managerial safety-net hypothesis. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 56, 605-629.
4.
Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2004). Building a good reputationEuropean Management Journal, 22, 704-713.
5.
Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and corporate social performance: the importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 35-55.
6.
Brancato, C.K. (1995). The Brancanto report on institutional investment, equity turnover and investment strategies. Chicago: The Conference Board.
7.
Brown, C. (1998). Rise of the institutional equity funds: implications for managerialism. Journal of Economic Issues, 32, 803-821.
8.
Bruce, R., & Targett, S. (2003). £15bn deficit in local authority pension funds . Financial Times, 28th April.
9.
Bushee, B.J. (1998). The influence of institutional investors in myopic R&D investment behavior. Accounting Review, 73, 305-333.
10.
Carroll, A.B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.
11.
Carroll, A.B. (2000). A commentary and an overview of key questions on corporate social performance measurement. Business & Society, 39, 466-478.
12.
Chaganti, R., & Damanpour, F. (1991). Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 479-491.
13.
Chan, L.K., & Lakonishok, J. (1995). The behaviour of stock prices around institutional trades. Journal of Finance, 50(4), 1147-1174.
14.
Cochran, P.L., & Wood, R.A.1984. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance . Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 42-56.
15.
Coffey, B.S., & Fryxell, G.E. (1991). Institutional ownership of stock and dimensions of corporate social performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 437-444.
16.
Commerzbank. (2002). Green with envy. SRI investors face additional, more complex, risks than their conventional counterparts. Frankfurt, Germany: Author.
17.
Conrad, A.F. (1988). Beyond managerialism: Investor capitalism?University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 22, 117-178.
18.
Cox, P., Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2004). An empirical examination of institutional investor preferences for corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 27-43.
19.
David, P., Hitt, M.A., & Gimeno, J. (2001). The influence of activism by institutional investors on R&D. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 144-157.
20.
David, P., Kochhar, R., & Levitas, E. (1998). The effects of institutional investors on the level and mix of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal , 41, 200-207.
21.
Davis, P.E., & Steil, B. (2001). Institutional investors. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
Dean, M. (2002, August 28). The build up of green pressure. The Guardian.
23.
Del Guercio, D. (1996). The distorting effect of the prudent-man laws on institutional equity investments. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(1), 31-62.
24.
Del Guercio, D., & Hawkins, J. (1999). The motivation and impact of pension fund activism . Journal of Financial Economics, 52, 293-340.
25.
Del Guercio, D., & Tkac, P.A. (2002). The determinants of the flow of funds of managed portfolios: Mutual funds versus pension funds. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 37, 523-557.
26.
Denham, J. (1998, July). Building a better world: The role of socially responsible pensions. Speech to the UK Investment ForumAGM, London.
27.
Duke, J., & Hunt, H. (1990). An empirical examination of debt covenant restrictions and accounting-related debt proxies. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12(1-3), 45-63.
28.
Eatkins, S.G., Stansell, S.R., & Buck, J.F. (1998). Analyzing the nature of institutional demand for common stocks. The Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics , 37(2), 33-48.
29.
Eng, L.L. (1999). Comparing changes in stockholdings of different institutional investors. Journal of Investing, 1, 46-50.
30.
Ethical Investor.1999. Find out what your pension's funding. July/August: 1-4. Retrieved June 2002 from http://www.eiris.org
Ftse. (2003a). Free float adjusted . Retrieved March 31, 2003, from http://www.ftse.com/indices_marketdata/Free_Float_Adjusted.jsp
33.
Ftse. (2003b). Ground rules for the management of the UK series of the FTSE actuaries share indices. Retrieved March 31, 2003, from http://www.ftse.com/indices_marketdata/ground_rules/uk-series-ground-rules.pdf
34.
Gimbel, F. (2003, November 5). Schemes failing to put money on their morals. Financial Times.
35.
Gompers, P.A., & Metrick, A. (2001). Institutional investors and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 229-259.
36.
Graves, S.B., & Waddock, S.A. (1994). Institutional owners and social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1034-1046.
37.
Greene, W.H. (1993). Econometric analysis. New York : Macmillan.
38.
Griffin, J.J., & Mahon, J.F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate. Business & Society, 36(1), 5-31.
Hamon, J., & Jacquillat, B. (1999). Is there value-added information in liquidity and risk premiums? European Financial Management , 5, 369-393.
41.
Hart, S.L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
42.
Herman, E.S. (1963). Growth and impact of mutual funds. Some analytical and public policy issues. Journal of Finance, 18(2), 360-376.
43.
Hillman, A.J., & Keim, G.D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line. Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125-139.
44.
Hmso. (1999). The Occupational Pension Schemes (investment, and assignment, forfeiture, bankruptcy etc.). Amendment regulations 1999. Statutory instrument 1999 no1849. Retrieved June 2002, from http://www.hmso.gov.uk/si/si1999/19991849.htm
45.
Johnson, R.D., & Greening, D.W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance . Academy of Management Journal, 42, 564-576.
46.
Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., Thaler, R., & Vishny, R. (1991). Window dressing by pension fund managers. American Economic Review, 81, 227-231.
Local Authority Pension Fund Forum. (2002). Mission statement. Retrieved June 2002 from http://www.lapfforum.org
50.
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91.
51.
Mattingly, J.E., & Berman, S.L. (2006). Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini Ratings data. Business & Society, 45, 20-46.
52.
McGuire, J.B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal , 31(4), 854-872.
Moskowitz, M. (1972). Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business & Society Review, 1, 71-75.
55.
Murphy, K., & Van Nuys, K. (1994). State pension funds and shareholder inactivism . Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.
56.
Myers, S. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance, 39(3), 575-592.
57.
National Association of Pension Funds. (2005 ). Review of the Institutional Shareholders' Committee statement of principles on the responsibilities of institutional shareholders and agents . Retrieved June 26, 2006, from http://www.napf.co.uk/Publications/Downloads/PolicyPapers/SectionI/2005/Comment_on_ISC_Principles.pdf
58.
National Statistics. (2002). Share ownership. A report on ownership of shares as at 31 December 2001. London: National Statistics.
59.
Richardson, A.J., Welker, M., & Hutchinson, I.R. (1999). Managing capital market reactions to corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1(1), 17-59.
Romano, R. (1993). Public pension fund activism in corporate governance reconsidered. Columbia Law Review, 93(4), 795-853.
62.
Ruf, B.M., Muralidhar, K., Brown, R.M., Janney, J.J., & Paul, K. (2001). An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: A stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics , 32, 143-156.
63.
Russo, M.V., & Fouts, P.A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal , 40(3), 534-559.
64.
Ryan, L.V., & Schneider, M. (2002). The antecedents of institutional investor activism . Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 554-573.
65.
Ryan, L.V., & Schneider, M. (2003). Institutional investor power and heterogeneity: Implications for agency and stakeholder theories. Business & Society, 42, 398-429.
66.
Shane, P.B., & Spicer, B.H. (1983). Market response to environmental information produced outside the firm. The Accounting Review, 58(3), 521-538.
67.
Sias, R. (1996, March/April). Volatility and the institutional investor. Financial Analysts Journal, 52, 13-20.
68.
Sparkes, R., & Cowton, C.J. (2004). The maturing of the social responsibility movement: A review of the developing link with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 45-57.
69.
Spicer, B.H. (1978). Investors, corporate social performance, and information disclosure: An empirical study. The Accounting Review, 53, 94-111.
70.
Tihanyi, L., Johnson, R.A., Hoskisson, R.E., & Hitt, M.A. (2003). Institutional ownership differences and international diversification: The effects of boards of directors and technological opportunity . Academy of Management Journal, 46, 195-211.
71.
Turban, D.B., & Greening, D.W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658-672.
72.
Ullman, A.A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Journal, 10(3), 540-557.
73.
Useem, M. (1996). Shareholders as a strategic asset. California Management Review, 39(1), 8-27.
74.
Waddock, S.A., & Graves, S.B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303-319.
