This article explores the concept of political capital in the setting of multinational corporation foreign subsidiaries. Drawing on resource dependence theory, the literature on corporate political activities, and the bargaining power framework, hypotheses are developed examining the antecedents to subsidiary political capital. The article tests hypotheses based on primary data from 91 foreign subsidiaries using path analysis. The empirical results suggest that both ownership of bargaining power resources and the management of those resources through government affairs activities are important in explaining the variation of political capital across foreign subsidiaries.
Armstrong, J., & Overton, T. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396-402.
2.
Baron, D.P. (1995). Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components . California Management Review, 37(2), 47-65.
3.
Blumentritt, T. (2003). Government affairs activities at MNE foreign subsidiaries . Business & Society, 42(2), 202-233.
4.
Blumentritt, T., & Nigh, D. (2002). The integration of subsidiary political activities in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), 57-77.
5.
Boddewyn, J.J., & Brewer, T.L. (1994). International-business political behavior: New theoretical directions. Academy of Management Review, 19, 119-143.
6.
Booth, J.A., & Richard, P.B. (1998). Civil society, political capital, and democratization in Central America. Journal of Politics, 60, 780-800.
7.
Coen, D. (1999). The impact of U. S. lobbying practice on the European business-government relationship. California Management Review , 41(4), 27-44.
8.
de la Torre, J. (1981). Foreign investment and economic development: Conflict and negotiation. Journal of International Business Studies , 12(3), 9-32.
9.
Delios, A., & Henisz, W.J. (2000). Japanese firms' investment strategies in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 305-323.
10.
Dess, G.G., & Robinson, R.B. , Jr. (1984). Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), 265-273.
11.
Directory of corporate affiliations. (1998). New Providence, NJ: National Register Publishing.
12.
Fagre, N., & Wells, L.T. (1982). Bargaining power of multinationals and host governments . Journal of International Business Studies, 13(3), 9-23.
13.
Fennel, M.L., & Alexander, J.A. (1987). Organizational boundary spanning in institutionalized environments. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 456-476.
14.
Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C.A. (1990). The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management Review , 15, 603-625.
15.
Gomes-Casseres, B. (1990). Firm ownership preferences and host government restrictions: An integrated approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 21, 1-22.
16.
Greening, D.W., & Gray, B. (1994). Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Academy of Management Journal , 37, 467-498.
17.
Griffin, J.J., & Dunn, P. (2004). Corporate public affairs: Commitment, resources, and structure. Business & Society, 43, 196-220.
18.
Henisz, W.J., & Delios, A. (2001). Uncertainty, imitation, and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990-1996. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 443-475.
19.
Hillman, A.J., & Hitt, M.A. (1999). Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation and strategy decisions. Academy of Management Review, 24, 825-842.
20.
Jenkins, B. (1986). Reexamining the "obsolescing bargain": A study of Canada's National Energy Program. International Organization , 40, 139-165.
21.
Kang, I., & Greene, K. (1999). A political economic analysis of [US] congressional voting patterns on NAFTA. Public Choice, 98, 385-397.
22.
Kobrin, S.J. (1987). Testing the bargaining hypothesis in the manufacturing sector in developing countries. International Organization , 41, 609-638.
23.
Lecraw, D.J. (1984). Bargaining power, ownership, and profitability of transnational corporations in developing countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 15(2), 27-43.
24.
Lenway, S.A., & Murtha, T.P. (1994). The state as strategist in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 25, 513-535.
25.
Luo, Y. (2001). Toward a cooperative view of MNC-host government relations: Building blocks and performance implications. Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 401-420.
26.
Mahini, A. (1988). Making decisions in multinational corporations: Managing relations with sovereign governments. New York : John Wiley.
27.
Mahon, J., & McGowan, R. (1996). Industry as a player in the political and social arena: Defining the competitive environment. Westport, CT: Quorum.
28.
Mezner, M.B., & Nigh, D. (1995). Buffer or bridge? Environmental and organizational determinants of public affairs activities inAmerican firms. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 975-976.
29.
Miles, R.H. (1987). Managing the corporate social environment: A grounded theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30.
Moon, C.W., & Lado, A.A. (2000). MNC-host government bargaining power relationship: A critique and extension within the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 26, 85-117.
31.
Murtha, T.P., & Lenway, S.A. (1994). Country capabilities and the strategic state: How national political institutions affect multinational corporations' strategies . Strategic Management Journal, 15, 113-129.
32.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.
33.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York : Harper and Row.
34.
Podsakoff, P.M., & Organ, D. (1986). Reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531-544.
35.
Poynter, T.A. (1982). Government intervention in less developed countries: The experience of multinational companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 13(1), 9-25.
36.
Public Affairs Council (1998). National Directory of Corporate Public Affairs. Washington, D.C.: Columbia Books, Inc.
37.
Rodriguez-Clare, A. (1996). Multinationals, linkages, and economic development . American Economic Review, 86, 852-873.
38.
Rosenzweig, P.M., & Singh, J.V. (1991). Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 16, 340-361.
39.
Schuler, D.A., & Rehbein, K.A. (1997). The filtering role of the firm in corporate political involvement. Business & Society, 36, 116-139.
40.
Seibert, S.E., Kraimet, M.L., & Liden, R.C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 219-237.
41.
Shaffer, B., & Hillman, A.J. (2000). The development of business-government strategies by diversified firms. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 175-190.
42.
Thompson, J.D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
43.
Vachani, S. (1995). Enhancing the obsolescing bargain theory: A longitudinal study of foreign ownership of U.S. & European multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 159-180.
44.
Wan, W., & Hillman, A. (2003, August). One of these things is not like the other: What contributes to dissimilarity among MNE subsidiaries' political strategies?Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Seattle.
45.
Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 341-363.
