Scholars and practitioners have wondered and debated over the participation of business organizations in the corporate social environment as well as argued over the successes or limitations of such participation. The authors examined six firms' corporate social responsibility activities within the beer industry in an effort to identify and compare these firms' stakeholder relations. The results have implications in our understanding and assessment of corporate social responsibility practices both within and across business industry groups.
Allebeck, P. (2005). Alcohol policy in Europe: What can the European Union do? Retrieved from www.ias.org.uk/publications/theglobe
2.
Barney, J. B., & Hansen, M. H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 175-216.
3.
Berman, S. L., Phillips, R., & Wicks, A. C. (2005). Resource dependence, managerial discretion and stakeholder performance [CD]. In K. M. Weaver (Ed.), Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management.
4.
Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 425, 488-506.
5.
Cogman, D., & Oppenheim, J. (2002). Controversy incorporated. McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 1-4.
6.
Davenport, K. (1998). Corporate citizenship: A stakeholder approach for defining corporate social performance and identifying measures for assessment. Doctoral dissertation, Fielding Graduate University, Santa Barbara, CA. Retrieved from http://wwww.fielding .edu/library/dissertations/default.asp.
7.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In P. DiMaggio & W. W. Powell (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 63-82). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1983)
8.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.
9.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
10.
French, J. L., & Wokutch, R. E. (2005). Child workers, globalization and international business ethics: A case study in Brazil's export-oriented shoe industry. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(4), 615-640.
11.
Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, pp. 122-126. (Original work published 1962)
12.
Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 41, 75-91.
13.
Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 304, 777-798.
14.
Godfrey, P. C., Hatch, N. A., & Hansen, J. M. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Theory and evidence. In L. V. Ryan & J. M. Logsdon (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society, pp. 112-117.
15.
Greening, D. W., & Gray, B. (1994). Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Academy of Management Journal, 373, 467-498.
16.
Griffin, J. J., & Dunn, P. (2004). Corporate public affairs: Commitment, resources, and structure. Business & Society, 432, 196-220.
17.
Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36(1), 5-31.
18.
Hatten, K., & Hatten, M. L. (1987). Strategic groups: Asymmetrical mobility barriers and contestability. Strategic Management Journal, 8(4), 329-342.
19.
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 202, 404-437.
20.
Kolk, A. (2003). Trends in sustainability reporting by the Fortune Global 250. Business Strategy and its Environment, 12, 279-291.
21.
Mahon, J. F., & McGowan, R. A. (1996). Industry as a player in the political and social arena: Defining the competitive environment. Greenwich, CT: Quorum Books.
22.
March, J., & Simon, H. (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
23.
Mascarenhas, B. (1989). Strategic group dynamics. Academy of Management Journal, 322, 333-352.
24.
Mascarenhas, B., & Aaker, D. A. (1989). Mobility barriers and strategic groups. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 475-485.
25.
Mattingly, J., & Berman, S. L. (2006). Measurement of corporate social action: Discovering taxonomy in KLD ratings data. Business & Society, 451, 20-46.
26.
McGee, J., & Thomas, H. (1986). Strategic groups: Theory, research and taxonomy. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 141-160.
27.
Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In P. DiMaggio & W. W. Powell (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 41-62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1977)
28.
Miles, R. H. (1987). Managing the corporate social environment: A grounded theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 224, 853-886.
30.
Nasi, J. (1995). What is stakeholder thinking? A snapshot of a social theory of the firm. In J. Nasi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking (pp. 19-32). Helsinki, Finland: LSR-Publications.
31.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
32.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
33.
Porter, M. E. (1990). Competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
34.
Rehbein, K. A., & Schuler, D. A. (1999). Testing the firm as a filter of corporate political action. Business & Society, 38, 144-156.
35.
Rowley, T., & Berman, S. L. (2000). A brand new brand of CSP. Business & Society, 394, 397-418.
36.
Schuler, D. A. (1996). Corporate political strategy and foreign competition: The case of the steel industry. Academy of Management Journal, 393, 720-737.
37.
Schuler, D. A., Rehbein, K., & Cramer, R. D. (2002). Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: A multivariate approach. Academy of Management Journal, 454, 659-672.
38.
Shaffer, B., & Hillman, A. J. (2000). The development of business-government strategies by diversified firms. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 175-190.
39.
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40.
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 414, 464-476.
41.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2004). Employment status of the civilian population by sex and age. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/news.release
42.
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997a). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 184, 303-319.
43.
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997b). Quality of management and quality of stakeholder relations: Are they synonymous?Business & Society, 36, 250-279.
44.
Wartick, S. L., & Mahon, J. F. (2000). From the editors. Business & Society, 39, 355-358.
45.
Wartick, S. L., & Mahon, J. F. (2003). Corporate social performance measurement: A quixotic adventure to...? In P. Lewellyn & S. A. Welcomer (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the International Association of Business and Society, pp. 101-104.
46.
Wartick, S. L., & Mahon, J. F. (2004, March). Corporate social performance measurement: Constructing CSP “profiles.” Paper presented at the 15th Annual International Association for Business and Society conference, Jackson Hole, WY.
47.
Weaver, G. D., Trevino, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999a). Corporate ethics programs as control systems: Influences of executive commitment and environmental factors. Academy ofManagement Journal, 42(1), 41-57.
48.
Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999b). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 539-552.
49.
Wokutch, R. E. (1990). Corporate social responsibility Japanese style. Academy of Management Executive, 4, 56-74.
50.
Wokutch, R. E., & Shepard, J. M. (1999). The maturing of the Japanese economy: Corporate social responsibility implications. Business Ethics Quarterly, 93, 527-540.
