Multinational corporations (MNCs) are the frequent target of nongovern-mental organizations (NGOs) in their advocacy efforts. In this article, the author examines NGO advocacy as it occurs in the NGO network and, using insights from the political science literature in conjunction with the resourcebased view of the firm, posits that NGO intranetwork conflict will result in a skewing of corporate social responsibility practices by the multinational corporation toward the MNC's developed country stakeholders. This skewing is a product of the asymmetric accountability of NGOs (upwardly accountable to donors, downwardly accountable to recipients). Developing country government and MNC strategies in the face of such skewing are discussed.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
2.
Doh, J. P., & Teegen, H. (2002). Nongovernmental organizations as institutional actors in international business: Theory and implications. International Business Review, 11, 665-684.
3.
Doh, J. P., & Teegen, H. (2003). Globalization and NGOs: Transforming business, government, and society. Westport, CT: Praeger.
4.
Domask, J. (2003). From boycotts to global partnership: NGOs, the private sector, and the struggle to protect the world's forests. In J. Doh & H. Teegen (Eds.), Globalization and NGOs: Transforming business, government, and society (pp. 157-185). Westport, CT: Praeger.
5.
Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31, 813-829.
6.
Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relationships. American Sociological Review, 27, 31-41.
7.
Fowler, A. (1992). Distant obligations: Speculation on NGO funding and the global market. Review of African Political Economy, 19(55), 9-29.
8.
Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profit. The New York Times Magazine, p. 126-126.
9.
Gnyawali, D. R. (1996). Corporate social performance: An international perspective. In S. B. Prasad (Ed.), Advances in international comparative management (Vol. 11, pp. 251-273). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
10.
Grugel, J. (2000). Romancing civil society: European NGOs in Latin America. Journal of Interamerican Studies & World Affairs, 42(2), 87-107.
11.
Helping FedEx deliver a cleaner truck. (2003). Retrieved February 2006 from http://www.environmentaldefense.org/system/templates/page/successstories.cfm?focus=4
12.
Husted, B. W., & de Jesus Salazar, J. (2006). Taking Friedman seriously: Maximizing profits and social performance. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 7-91.
13.
International Center for Corporate Accountability. (2005). Audit report: Human rights, employment and social development of Papuan people in Indonesia. Retrieved from http://www.icca-corporateaccountability.org/PDFs/FreeportReportPhI.pdf
14.
Jordan, L., & van Tuijl, P. (2000). Political responsibility in NGO advocacy: Exploring emerging shapes of global democracy. World Development, 28, 2051-2065.
15.
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists without borders. Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press.
16.
Marcussen, H. S. (1996). NGOs, the state, and civil society. Review of African Political Economy, 23(69), 405-423.
17.
Meyer, C. A. (1999). The economics and politics of NGOs in Latin America. Westport, CT: Praeger.
18.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Free Press.
19.
Provan, K. (1980). Recognizing, measuring, and interpreting the potential/enacted power distinction in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 5, 549-559.
20.
Sethi, S. P. (1994). Multinational corporations and the impact of public advocacy on corporate strategy: Nestlé and the infant formula controversy. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
21.
Sethi, S. P. (2003). Setting global standards: Guidelines for creating codes of conduct in multi-national corporations. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
22.
Sethi, S. P., & Williams, O. F. (2000). Creating and implementing global codes of conduct: An assessment of the Sullivan Principles as a role model for developing international codes of conduct—Lessons learned and unlearned. Business and Society Review, 105, 169-200.
23.
Sethi, S. P., & Williams, O. F. (2001). Economic imperatives and ethical values in global business: The South African experience and international codes today. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
24.
Skjelsbaek, K. (1971). The growth of international nongovernmental organization in the twentieth century. International Organization, 7(2), 420-442.
25.
Stirrat, R. L., & Henkel, H. (1997). The development gift: The problem of reciprocity in the NGO world. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 554, 66-80.
26.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-610.
27.
Teegen, H. (2003). International NGOs as global institutions: Using social capital to impact multinational enterprises and governments. Journal of International Management, 9, 271-285.
28.
Walter, A. (2001). NGOs, business, and international investment: The Multilateral Agreement on Investment, Seattle, and beyond. Global Governance, 7(1), 51-73.
29.
Yamin, F. (2001). NGOs and international environmental law: A critical evaluation of their roles and responsibilities. RECEIL, 10, 149-162.
