This study offers a theoretical framework for stakeholder management in an international and multicultural environment. Through the use of an extensive qualitative case study analysis, a methodological approach was developed for analyzing stakeholder dialogue data for cultural differences. Based on the empirical data it was possible to show specific ways in which cultural dimensions affect the international diffusion of stakeholder related policies. These findings contribute to the fields knowledge on internal stakeholder management implementation, by addressing the complexity of embedding stakeholder management principles and practices within various international subsidiaries of the same multinational organization.
Barham, K.,& Heimer, C. (1998). ABB—the dancing giant: Creating the globally connected corporation. London: Pitman.
2.
Bartlett, C. A.,& Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
3.
Blodgett, J. G., Lu, L.-C., Rose, G. M., & Vitell, S. J. (2001). Ethical sensitivity to stakeholder interests: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(2), 190-202.
4.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
5.
Carroll, A. B. (1994). Social issues in management research: Experts’ views, analysis, and commentary. Business & Society, 33(1), 5-29.
6.
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.
7.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
8.
Getz, K. A., & Volkema, R. J. (2001). Culture, perceived corruption, and economics: A model of predictors and outcomes. Business & Society, 40(1), 7-30.
9.
Glaser, B. G.,& Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.Chicago: Aldine.
10.
Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 479-485.
11.
Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 87-99.
12.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
14.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Larsson, R.,& Risberg, A. (1998). Cultural awareness and national versus corporate barriers to acculturation. In M. Cardel Gertsen, A.-M. Søderberg, & J. E. Torp (Eds.), Cultural dimensions of international mergers and acquisitions(pp. 39-56). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
16.
Lowe, S. (2001). In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1(3), 313-332.
17.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Shenkar, O. (2001). Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 519-535.
19.
Sivakumar, K.,& Nakata, C. (2001). The stampede toward Hofstede’s framework: Avoiding the sample design pit in cross-cultural research. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 555-574.
20.
Søndergaard, M. (1994). Hofstede’s consequences: A study of reviews, citations, and replications. Organization Studies, 15(3), 447-456.
21.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Teagarden, M. B., et al. (1995). Toward a theory of comparative management research: An idiographic case study of the best international human resources management project. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1261-1287.
Winn, M. I. (2001). Building stakeholder theory with a decision modeling methodology. Business & Society, 40(2), 133-166.
25.
Wokutch, R. E. (1998). The evolution of social issues in management: What’s in, what’s out, what’s hot, and what’s not. Business & Society, 37(1), 113-125.
26.
Wright, L. L. (1996). Qualitative international management research. In B. J. Punnett & O. Shenkar (Eds.), Handbook for international management research(pp. 63-81). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
27.
Wright, L. L., Lane, H. W., & Beamish, P. W. (1988). International management research: Lessons from the field. International Studies of Management& Organization, 18(3), 55-71.
28.
Yin, R. K. (1993). Applications of case study research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
