This article focuses on the association between the beliefs of small business owners and managers and their support for the community. Qualitative and quantitative data are utilized in an exploratory examination of two rationales for socially responsible behavior and of two kinds of support. Analyses show that the belief in strengthening the community as an important strategy for business success is positively associated with the provision of nonrisky and risky support. Risky support may threaten short-term business success. However, the belief that a good public image is important for business success is negatively or not significantly associated with either risky or nonrisky support for the community. Findings uphold the position that there are significant variations in enlightened self-interest rationales that are differentially associated with business social performance among small business operators and demonstrate the usefulness of disaggregating social performance into risky and nonrisky variations.
Anshen, M. (1970). Changing the social contract: A role for business. Columbia Journal of World Business, 5, 6-14.
2.
Aram, J. D. (1989). The paradox of interdependent relations in the field of social issues in management. Academy of Management Review, 14(2), 266-283.
3.
Arlow, P., & Gannon, M. (1982). Social responsiveness, corporate structure and economic performance. Academy of Management Review, 7, 235-241.
4.
Atkinson, L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (1988). Stock ownership and company contributions to charity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 82-100.
5.
Besser, T. (2002). The conscience of capitalism: Business social responsibility to communities. Westport, CT: Praeger
6.
Brown, D. J., & King, J. (1982). Small business ethics: Influences and perceptions. Journal of Small Business Management, 20(1), 11-18.
7.
Buchholtz, A. K., Amason, A. C.,& Rutherford, M. A. (1999). Beyond resources: The mediating effect of top management discretion and values on corporate philanthropy. Business & Society, 38, 167-187.
8.
Building Business Investment in Community. (2003). The business of giving back: 2002 survey of business giving and community involvement. St. Paul, MN: Author.
9.
Burlingame, D. F.,& Kaufmann, D. A. (1995). Indiana business contributions to community service. Indianapolis, IN: Center on Philanthropy, Indiana University.
10.
Butler, M. A., & Beale, C. L. (1993). Rural-urban continuum codes for metro and nonmetro counties, 1993(Rep. No. AGES 9425). Washington, DC: Agriculture and Rural Economy Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
11.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
12.
CHI Research, Inc. (2003). Small serial innovators: The small firm contribution to technical change. Retrieved June 29, 2004, from http://www.chiresearch.com/policy/eval/studies/sba.php3
13.
CHI Research, Inc. (2004). Small firms and technology: Acquisitions, inventor movement and technology transfer. Retrieved June 29, 2004, from http://www.chiresearch.com/policy/eval/studies/sba.php3
14.
Chrisman, J. J., & Fry, F. L. (1982). Public vs. business expectations: Two views of social responsibility for small business. Journal of Small BusinessManagement, 20(1), 19-26.
15.
Committee for Economic Development, Research and Policy. (1971). Social responsibilities of business corporations: A statement on national policy. New York: Author.
16.
Davis, K.,& Blomstrom, R. L. (1971). Business, society and environment: Social power and social response(2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
Frederick, W. C. (1978). FromCSR1 to CSR2: The maturing of business and society thought. Business & Society, 33(2), 150-164.
18.
Freudenburg, W. R. (1986). The density of acquaintanceship: An overlooked variable in community research. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 27-63.
19.
Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of workfamily conflicts: Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 65-78.
20.
Galaskiewicz, J. (1985). Social organization of an urban grants economy: A study of business philanthropy and nonprofit organizations. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
21.
Galaskiewicz, J. (1997). An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the Twin Cities, 1979-1981, 1987-89. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 445-471.
22.
Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034-1046.
23.
Griffin, J., & Mahon, J. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36, 5-32.
24.
Harrison, B. (1992). Industrial districts: Old wine in new bottles?Regional Studies, 26, 469-483.
25.
Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564-576.
26.
Kasarda, J. D., & Janowitz, M. (1974). Community attachment in mass society. American Sociological Review, 39, 328-339.
27.
Keim, G. D. (1978). Corporate social responsibility: An assessment of the enlightened selfinterest model. Academy of Management Review, 3(1), 32-39.
28.
Loscocco, K. A. (1997). Work-family linkages among self-employedwomen and men. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 204-226.
29.
McElroy, K. M., & Siegfried, J. (1986). The community influence on corporate contributions. Public Finance Quarterly, 14(4), 394-414.
30.
Miller, N.,& Besser, T. (2000). The importance of community values in small business strategy formation: Evidence from rural Iowa. Journal of Small Business Management, 38(1), 68-85.
31.
Sinclair, M., & Galaskiewicz, J. (1997). Corporate nonprofit partnerships: Varieties and covariates. New York Law School Law Review, 61(3&4), 1059-1090.
32.
Smith, C. (1994). The new corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 72(3), 105-116.
33.
Smith, D. H. (1994). Determinants of voluntary association participation and volunteering: A literature review. Nonprofit and Volunteer Sector Quarterly, 23, 243-263.
34.
Smith, P., & Oakley, E. F., III. (1994). A study of the ethical values of metro and non-metro small business owners. Journal of Small Business Management, 32(4), 17-27.
35.
Spence, L. J., & Rutherfoord, R. (2001). Social responsibility, profit maximization and the small firm owner-manager. Small Business and Enterprise Development, 8(2), 21-30.
36.
Spence, L. J., & Rutherfoord, R. (2003). Small business and empirical perspectives in business ethics: Editorial. Journal of Business Ethics, 47, 1-5.
37.
Stendardi, E. J., Jr. (1992). Corporate philanthropy: The redefinition of enlightened selfinterest. The Social Science Journal, 29(1), 21-30.
38.
Stinner, W. F., Van Loon, M., Chung, S., & Byun, Y. (1990). Community size, individual social position, and community attachment. Rural Sociology, 55(4), 494-521.
39.
Swanson, D. L. (1995). Addressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 43-64.
40.
Thompson, J. K., & Smith, H. L. (1991). Social responsibility and small business: Suggestions for research. Journal of Small Business Management, 29, 39-44.
41.
Thompson, J. K., Smith, H. L.,& Hood, J. N. (1993). Charitable contributions by small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 31(3), 35-51.
42.
Tolbert, C. M., Lyson, T. A.,& Irwin, M. D. (1998). Local capitalism, civic engagement, and socioeconomic well being. Social Forces, 77, 401-429.
43.
Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy ofManagement Journal, 40(3), 658-672.
44.
U.S. Census Bureau. (1992). Economic census: Enterprise statistics. Table 1 employers and nonemployers. Washington, DC: Author.
45.
U.S. Census Bureau. (1997). Economic census: United States. The number of firm, establishments, employment, annual payroll, and estimated receipts by industrial division and enterprise employment size for 1996. Washington, DC: Author.
46.
Useem, M.,& Kutner, S. I. (1986). Corporate contributions to culture and the arts: The organization of giving and the influence of the chief executive officer and of other firms on company contributions in Massachusetts. In P. J. DiMaggio (Ed.), Nonprofit enterprise in the arts: Studies in mission and constraint(pp. 93-112). New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
U.S. Small Business Administration. (1993). Our 1992 state profile. Washington, DC: Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy.
48.
U.S. Small Business Administration. (1998). The new American revolution: The role and impact of small firms. Retrieved November 20, 2003, from http://www.sba.gov/advo/stats/econ_arch/evol_pap.html
49.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L.,& Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
Waddock, S. L.,& Graves, S. B. (2000). Performance characteristics of social and traditional investments. Journal of Investing, 9(2), 27-38.
51.
Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758-769.
52.
Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L. K.,& Cochran, P. L. (1999a). Corporate ethics programs as control systems: Influences of executive commitment and environmental factors. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 41-57.
53.
Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L. K.,& Cochran, P. L. (1999b). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressure, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 539-552.
54.
Wilson, E. (1980). Social responsibility of business: What are small business perspectives?Journal of Small Business Management, 18(3), 17-24.
55.
Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1997). Who cares? Towards an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62, 694-713.
56.
Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691-718.
