Argenti, P. A.
(1998). Corporate communications(2nd ed.). Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
2.
Baucus, M. S.
(1995). Halo-adjusted residuals: Prolonging the life of a terminally ill measure of corporate social performance. Business & Society, 34, 227-235.
3.
Bromley, D. B.
(1993). Reputation, image and impression management. New York: John Wiley.
4.
Brown, B.
, & Logsdon, J. M. (1997). Factors influencing Fortune’s corporate reputation for “community and environmental responsibility.” In J. Weber & K. Rehbein (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society(pp. 184-189).
5.
Brown, B.
,& Logsdon, J. M. (1999). Corporate reputation and organization identity as constructs for business and society research. In D. Wood & D. Windsor (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society, (pp. 168-173).
6.
Brown, B.
, & Perry, S. (1994). Removing the financial performance halo from Fortune’s “most admired companies.”Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1346-1359.
7.
Brown, B.
,& Perry, S. (1995). Some additional thoughts on halo-removed Fortune residuals. Business & Society, 34, 236-240.
8.
Carroll, A. B.
(1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.
9.
Dowling, G.
(2001). Creating corporate reputations: Identity, image, and performance. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Fombrun, C. J.
(1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
11.
Fombrun, C. J.
,& Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233-258.
12.
Fryxell, G.
, & Wang, J. (1994). The Fortune corporate reputation index: Reputation for what?Journal of Management, 20, 1-14.
13.
Logsdon, J. M.
, & Wartick, S. L. (1995). Theoretically based applications and implications for using the Brown and Perry database. Business & Society, 34, 222-226.
14.
Mahon, J. F.
, & Wartick, S. (2000). From the editors. Business & Society, 39(4), 355-358.
15.
Mahon, J. F.
, Wartick, S. L.,& Fleisher, C. S. (2002). Public affairs, issues management, and corporate political strategy: An introduction. Journal of Public Affairs, 1(4) and 2(1), 294-302.
16.
Margolis, J. D.
, & Walsh, J. P. (2001). People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Morley, M.
(1998). How to manage your global reputation: A guide to the dynamics of international public relations. New York: New York University Press.
18.
Orlitzky, M.
,& Benjamin, J. D. (2001). Corporate social performance and firm risk: Ametaanalytic review. Business & Society, 40, 369-396.
19.
Sharfman, M.
(1996). The construct validity of the Kinder, Lydenberg, and Domini social performance ratings data. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 287-296.
20.
Wartick, S. L.
(1992). The relationship between intense media exposure and change in corporate reputation. Business & Society, 31, 33-49.
21.
Wartick, S. L.
(2000). The problem of inter-rater group differences in the Fortune‘most admired companies” survey: An empirical look using financial performance measures. In K. A. Getz & D. Windsor (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society(pp. 59-64.)
22.
Wartick, S. L.
, & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10, 758-769.
23.
Whetten, D.
, & Godfrey, P. (1998). Identity in organizations: Developing theory through conversations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Wood, D. J.
(1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691-718.
25.
Wood, D. J.
, & Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3, 229-267.
