The authors studied the impact of social-ethical investing on firms targeted during the South African boycott. Findings indicate that the average percentage of institutional ownership of the stocks of the firms with equity interests in South Africa increased at a significantly greater rate than the rest of the market following the end of sanctions. Using event study methodology, the authors find that these stocks significantly outperform the market in this period. This study provides evidence of the stockmark et impact of social-ethical investing and of a positive relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance as measured in stockmarket returns.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbott, W. F.
,& Monsen, R. J. (1979). On the measurement of corporate social responsibilities: Self-reported disclosure as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 501-515.
2.
Alm, R.
(1986). Big U.S. firms join the exodus leaving South Africa. U.S. News & World Report, 101, 34-34.
3.
Anderson, J. C.
, & Frankel, A. W. (1980). Voluntary social reporting: An isobeta portfolio analysis. Accounting Review, 55, 467-479.
4.
Aupperle, K. E.
, Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 446-463.
5.
Barber, J. R.
, & Lyon, J. D. (1997). Detecting long-run abnormal stockreturns: The empirical power and specification of test statistics. Journal of Financial Economics, 43(3), 341-372.
6.
Barr, P. G.
(1993, December 13). State, localities end South Africa sanctions. Pensions & Investments, p. 21-21.
7.
Beneish, M.
,& Whaley, R. (1996). An anatomy of the “S&P game”: The effects of changing the rules. Journal of Finance, 51, 1909-1930.
8.
Biggs, J. H.
(1998, August). How to make choices for a social choice account. The Participant, pp. 2-3.
9.
Bill for lifting sanctions clears two house panels
. (1993, October 7). The Wall Street Journal, p. A12-A12.
10.
Bowman, E.
,& Haire, M. (1975). Astrategic posture towards CSR. California Management Review, 18(2), 49-58.
11.
Bragdon, J. H.
,& Marlin, J. (1972). Is pollution profitable?Risk Management, 19(4), 9-18.
12.
Brown, S. J.
, & Warner, J. B. (1985). Using daily stockreturns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14, 3-31.
13.
Chen, K. H.
,& Metcalf, R. W. (1980). The relationship between pollution control record and financial indicators revisited. Accounting Review, 55, 168-177.
14.
Cochran, P. L.
, & Wood, R. A. (1984). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 42-56.
15.
Folger, H.
,& Nutt, F. (1975). Anote on social responsibility and stockv aluation. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 155-159.
16.
Freedman, M.
, & Jaggi, B. (1982). Pollution performance and economic performance. Omega, 10, 167-186.
17.
Frooman, J.
(1997). Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth: A meta-analysis of event studies. Business & Society, 36, 221-249.
18.
Fry, F.
, & Hock, R. J. (1976). Who claims corporate responsibility? The biggest and the worst. Business and Society Review/Innovation, 18(8), 62-65.
19.
Goodbye to the Sullivan principles. (1987, July 6). Fortune, p. 10-10.
20.
Gould, C.
(1994, June 12). A social responsibility shake-up. The New York Times, p. 14-14
21.
Griffin, J. J.
& Mahon, J. F. (1997). corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36, 5-31.
22.
Harris, L.
,& Gurel, E. (1986). Price and volume effects associated with changes in S&P 500: New evidence for the existence of price pressures. Journal of Finance, 41, 815-830.
23.
Ingram, R. W.
, & Frazier, K. B. (1980). Environmental performance and corporate disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 18, 614-622.
24.
Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility
. (1978). Church proxy resolutions. New York: Author.
25.
Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility
. (1979). Church proxy resolutions. New York: Author.
26.
Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility
. (1980). Church proxy resolutions. New York: Author.
27.
Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility
. (1981). Church proxy resolutions. New York: Author.
28.
Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility
. (1982). Church proxy resolutions. New York: Author.
29.
Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility
. (1983). Church proxy resolutions. New York: Author.
30.
Judd, E.
(1990). Investing with a social conscience. New York: Pharos Books.
31.
Kim, O.
,& Verecchia, R. E. (1991). Market reaction to anticipated announcements. Journal of Financial Economics, 30, 273-309.
32.
Kothari, S. P.
, & Warner, J. B. (1997). Measuring long-horizon security price performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 43(3), 301-339.
33.
Lewis, P.
(1993, September 25). Mandela calls for an end to sanctions. The New York Times, pp. 1-1, 5-5.
34.
Limbacher, P. B.
(1993, October 4). End to sanctions could boost stocks. Pensions& Investments, p. 3-3.
35.
Litvak, L.
, DeGrasse, R., & McTigue, K. (1978). South Africa: Foreign investment and apartheid. Washington, DC: Institute for Policy Studies.
36.
Loeb, M.
(1993, July 13). Mandela reaches out to business. Fortune, p. 104-104.
37.
Lydenberg, S. D.
, & Paul, K. (1997). Stakeholder theory and socially responsible investing: Toward a convergence of theory and practice. In J. Weber& K. Rehbein (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Association of Business and Society, 8th Annual Conference(pp. 208-213). Destin, FL: International Association of Business and Society.
38.
Lynch, A. W.
, & Mendenhall, R. R. (1997). New evidence on stockprice effects associated with changes in the S&P 500 Index. Journal of Business, 70(3), 351-383.
39.
McGuire, J. B.
, Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 854-872.
40.
McWilliams, A.
, & Siegel, D. (1997). Event studies in management research: Theoretical and empirical issues. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 626-657.
41.
McWilliams, A.
, & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification?Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603-609.
42.
Meznar, M. B.
, Nigh, D., & Kwok, C. Y. (1994). Effect of announcements of withdrawal from South Africa on stockholder wealth. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1633-1648.
43.
Meznar, M. B.
, Nigh, D., & Kwok, C. Y. (1998). Announcements of withdrawal from South Africa revisited: Making sense of contradictory event study findings. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 715-730.
44.
Miles, R. H.
(1987). Managing the corporate social environment: A grounded theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
45.
Moskowitz, M. R.
(1972). Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society Review, 1, 71-75.
46.
Myers, D. III
, Propp, K., Hauck, D., & Liff, D. (1980). U.S. business in South Africa: The economic, political, and moral issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
47.
Posnikoff, J.
(1997). Disinvestment from South Africa: They did well by doing good. Contemporary Economic Policy, 15(1), 76-86.
48.
Preston, L. E.
(1978). Analyzing corporate social performance: Methods and results. Journal of Contemporary Business, 7, 135-150.
49.
Preston, L. E.
, & O’Bannon, D. P. (1997). The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Business & Society, 36, 419-429.
50.
Propp, K.
(1979). The domestic debate over South Africa. New York: Investor Responsibility Research Center.
51.
Roman, R. M.
, Hayibor, S.,& Agle, B. R. (1999). The relationship between social and financial performance: Repainting a portrait. Business & Society, 38, 109-125.
52.
Scholes, M. S.
(1972). The market for securities: Substitution versus price pressure and the effects of information on share price. Journal of Business, 45, 179-211.
53.
Seidman, A.
, & Seidman, N. (1978). South Africa and U.S. multinational corporations. Westport, CT: Lawrence Hill.
54.
Shleifer, A.
(1986). Do demand curves for stocks slope down?Journal of Finance, 41, 579-590.
55.
Socially responsible investing in U.S. tops two trillion dollar mark. (1999, November 4). Social Investment Forum News. Retrieved May 7, 2000, from http://www.socialinvest.org/areas/news/1999-trends.htm
56.
Spicer, B. H.
(1978). Investors, corporate social performance, and information disclosure: An empirical study. Accounting Review, 53, 94-111.
57.
Sturdivant, F. D.
, & Ginter, J. L. (1977). Corporate social responsiveness, management attitudes, and economic performance. California Management Review, 19(3), 30-39.
58.
Teoh, S. H.
, Welch, I.,& Wazzan, C. P. (1999). The effect of socially activist investment policies on the financial markets: Evidence from the South African boycott. Journal of Business, 72(1), 35-89.
59.
Ullmann, A. A.
(1985). Data in search of a theory: Acritical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U. S. firms. Academy of Management Review, 10, 540-557.
60.
UN economic curbs on Pretoria are lifted. (1993, October 9). The New York Times, p. 8-8.
61.
Vance, S.
(1975). Are socially responsible firms good investment risks?Management Review, 64, 18-24.
62.
Waddock, S. A.
, & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance—financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.
63.
Weedon, D. R.
(1986, Spring). The evolution of Sullivan principle compliance. Business and Society Review, pp. 56-60.
64.
Williams, O.
(1986). The apartheid crisis. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
65.
Wiseman
. (1972). An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 7, 53-63.
66.
Wokutch, R. E.
(1982). “Ethical” investment policies and activities of Catholic religious orders. In L. E. Preston (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy(Vol. 3, pp. 157-188). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
67.
Wokutch, R. E.
, & McKinney, E. W. (1991). Behavioral and perceptual measures of corporate social performance. In L. E. Preston (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy(Vol. 12, pp. 309-330). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
68.
Wokutch, R. E.
,& Spencer, B. A. (1987). Corporate saints and sinners: The effects of philanthropic and illegal activity on organizational performance. California Management Review, 29(2), 62-77.
69.
Wood, D. J.
, & Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3, 229-267.
70.
Wright, P.
, & Ferris, S. (1997). Agency conflict and corporate strategy: The effect of divestment on corporate value. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 77-83.
